MissNomer

laoban00 said:

For your info the best smartphone in the world is the Huawei Mate 20 pro. 

That's a very subjective opinion only and shall be treated as such.

ClarityToSee said:

I would agree with the lawsuit. The two factor authentication process is time consuming and inconvenient for the users.  
Apple should work on another way to strengthen security. What happened to simple and intuitive philosophy of Apple’s? 

Totally disagree. The plantiffs have to prove actual harm caused by Apple's 2FA. Having to spend an extra 30 seconds in logging in causes zero harm - and unless being a delicate little snowflake has become an protected class, there's zero merit.

This lawsuit is totally and utterly ridiculous and should be thrown out ASAP.

Sparks, like brown stuff, happens. Anyone using Oxtgen should know that there's a slew of warnings. Heck, one shouldn't even use Hand Sanitizer when on Oxygen. Using electric devices has always been on the list of things to avoid like the plague. I'm sorry for the injury, but suing because you were stupid and used an electronic device that's plugged into the mains power whilst on Oxygen seems to be a typical response when you think other people should cover you for your screw ups.

gmgravytrain said:

Unfortunately, Apple loses again....High Android smartphone sales combined with their overall market share percentage are absolutely crushing Apple into a poorly valued mess of a company. 

That'll be why the arguably the worlds best, most astute and successful investor, Warren Buffet, continues to buy shares in the business.

You are aware that Apple have hit the same issue as pretty much everyone else - Peak-SmartPhone (all the vendors are reaching this)? And that Apple already saw the writing on the wall which is the reason behind them branching heavily into new areas such as Wearables (the AirPods and the Apple Watch - both of which of which have been monumentally successful and exceptionally strong profit drivers).

Only someone who doesn't truly understand the company would make facile statements such as yours.

Please try to contain your hatred of the company and keep your statements factual.

arlor said:

maestro64 said:

I want to know how everyone else in the car that was hit was not seriously injured, only the 5 year old, wonder if the parent did something wrong and now they feel guilty and want someone else to pay for their guilt.

You have absolutely no responsible basis for that allegation, even if it were true that only the child was seriously injured. The article says that the father was also in critical condition after the accident. At least read the article before you spout off about a situation that you know nothing about in which a child died and the grieving parent probably already blames himself in part for failing to somehow magically anticipate getting rear-ended at 65mph.

Just to be clear, my reaction here has nothing to do with the lawsuit. 

And yet it was the family who lost their child who launched this ridiculous lawsuit.

Loosing a child is a most terrible awful thing that no parent should have to go through. However subsequently then launching pointless sueballs is a one of the fastest ways for them to lose any public sympathy.

We all have responsibility for our actions; For the dumb stupid kid who was facetiming while driving -  he totally deserves all the legal and civil retribution available.

And for the family that launched this lawsuit and continued pursuing it in the cold hard light of day; they deserve all the public derision they're getting for them launching and continuing to fight this pointless and sadly quite laughable legal action.

In this case, it's only human nature to ask 'Why?'

(Caveat emptor - a girl I was dating was killed by a drunk driver - I held him and him alone responsible for his actions.)