sbdude

About

Username
sbdude
Joined
Visits
77
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,071
Badges
1
Posts
312
  • England's poshest school Eton bans iPhones but provides iPads

    When he was Prime Minister, Boris Johnston claimed that no country in the world had got Apple and Google's COVID app to work, while the rest of Europe carried on with their successful ones.

    Emphasis mine. Surely a BBC alum should have caught that one.
    watto_cobra
  • iPhone Fold screen may wrap around the case

    avon b7 said:
    melgross said:
    I hope not. That’s a stupid idea. Huawei tried that for their first model and it was mocked and a failure. There’s no easy way to protect a folding screen.
    It's not a stupid idea, nor was it mocked (at least by most reviewers - though some will mock anything for a click). 

    Mate X:

    "The Huawei Mate X might be the first foldable phone you seriously consider paying gobs of money for in 2019. Its solid-feeling hinge allows this handset to fold up, transforming from full 8-inch tablet into a more-traditional-looking 6.6-inch and 6.38-inch smartphone with a screen on either side. It feels like you're holding the future in your hand, just know that your transformative euphoria over this phone comes at a very high price."

    Mate Xs:

    "A foldable phone that expands into a tablet has been thought of as the next form factor for mobile devices. Huawei has thrown conventional design out of the window with Mate Xs by placing the foldable screen on the outside and we think this design makes great sense as you're not stuck with a secondary smaller display"

    Mate Xs2:

    "This unique, wraparound foldable design opens up a wealth of advantages, showcased by the Mate Xs 2's predecessor. These include a thinner body, a larger tablet screen, and a comfortable front display when in smartphone mode. That's versus the hyper-tall 25:9 cover screen on the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Z Fold 3 that's super-narrow."

    (All comments from Tech Radar). 

    It is an idea that, like most folding options, has pros and cons. 

    You protect a folding screen by looking after it. You protect an outer folding screen by taking extra care. Especially given the asking price. 

    Even slab phones are used in pouches and users slip them in and out. They are perfect for 'outside screen' folders.

    The main advantages are, ehem, twofold. 

    Less screens on device and and a thinner overall design. 

    In the case of the above mentioned Huawei variants, most of the hardware is placed in a balanced 'grip'. A single strip that allows the rest of the phone to be extra thin. 

    And don't forget the model mentioned here is the XS2. The third model  of the design.

    It's all a question of options. How many types of folding options are there? Or you fold 'in' or you fold 'out' (although tri-folding phones are coming, it seems). That is it. 

    Huawei has brought both types to market. 

    If you fold 'in' you need an extra screen. If you don't fold in, you don't, but the tradeoff is the screen is less protected. Let's forget for a moment that phones that fold 'in' also have that extra screen facing down on a surface when it gets fully opened. 

    I will mention though that the frames are designed so as to keep the screens off of flat surfaces. 

    That does not eliminate the tradeoff completely. 

    You choose what you prefer based on your needs/preferences/budget... 



    At least we know one blog likes a foldable phone. That should be reason enough, right? Right?!?
    watto_cobra
  • watchOS 11 introduces improved health tracking & Smart Stack widgets

    40domi said:
    The whole team working on watch OS, should be fired, what they've come out with is embarrassing & insulting !

    Care to elaborate? How much, exactly, do you expect a computer on your wrist to accomplish?
    watto_cobra
  • Adobe has clarified controversial shrinkwrap license terms, but the damage may have alread...

    gatorguy said:
    Maurizio said:
    gatorguy said:

    The important sentence fragment: "as well as to use the materials (photos, videos et al) you submit for Apple internal purposes" Those internal purposes are left open-ended and unspecified. Review by a human, hopefully an Apple employee and not a contractor, may also be just as much an issue, or non-issue, for those under an NDA as it might be at Adobe.
    The point here is that these conditions apply to material submitted to media services, like reviews and user contributions, not to the content of you iCloud disk or iPhone or Mac. They are pretty standard conditions for these kind of submission.

    By the way, what Adobe says doesn't matter at all; legal terms are legal terms, and providing an worldwide exclusive license have a precise meaning, that no amount of explication from Adobe can change.
    This Agreement governs your use of Apple’s services (“Services” – e.g., and where available, App Store, Apple Arcade, Apple Books, Apple Fitness+, Apple Music, Apple News, Apple News+, Apple One, Apple Podcasts, Apple Podcasts Subscriptions, Apple TV, Apple TV+, Apple TV Channels, Game Center, iTunes), through which you can buy, get, license, rent or subscribe to content, Apps (as defined below), and other in-app services (collectively, “Content”).
     
    "Content” means any information that may be generated or encountered through use of the Service, such as data files, device characteristics, written text, software, music, graphics, photographs, images, sounds, videos, messages and any other like materials.



    You can make anything look bad when you take it out of context.
    ronnzeus423watto_cobra
  • How to not get taken for $1000 by Apple Pay scammers

    How about not tapping to pay with any "merchant" you don't trust? Problem solved.
    zeus423chia