Beats
About
- Banned
- Username
- Beats
- Joined
- Visits
- 60
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6,902
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,073
Reactions
-
Facebook considers telling users enabling tracking keeps app 'free of charge'
Xed said:a hawkins said:heli0s said:I joined Facebook in 2006, back when it was a completely different experience. Finally left all of their platforms in 2020 and never looked back. My mental health has been significantly better since. -
Lossless streaming option for Apple Music may launch within weeks
I’ve been saying it for years. Apple needs a separate music event like they had for iPods back in the day.
They could announce all music related tech in one go. AirPods, Beats, Speakers, Apple Music, Radio, iTunes, Apps and music related features. Have music presenters like the launch of Apple Music then cap it off it with an artist performance.
I miss Bozoma “Boz” Saint John, Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre. It’s as if Apple had a bad falling out with the music industry in general.
P.S. Apple had an opportunity to make an “Apple Records” when Jimmy and Dre were hired. This was like hiring George Lucas and Steven Spielberg but not using them for film making. -
Lossless streaming option for Apple Music may launch within weeks
InspiredCode said:The referenced article is not explicit about an extra fee. It says $9.99 tier, not a $19.98 tier. It also says it will be the same price as the standard plan.Additionally it says this “Speculation within the industry suggests Apple's move is to provide a more aggressively priced, higher-quality option after Spotify announced this week it was raising prices.”This suggests Apple plans to significantly undercut Spotify’s price. If this were an extra fee, it would not be undercutting Spotify.Are we sure they are talking about it being an additional price in Apple’s case?Apple may just be absorbing any extra cost to increase subscribers and to bring more music fans in the Apple ecosystem. They could then use Apple Music to drive more users to other Apple services. Apple tends to not like to make extra money over specs that don’t require physical hardware changes, so if they were forced to do add a fee by the industry I would expect it to be a smaller increase like Amazon’s. If they don’t increase the price, it gives Apple bragging rights that their service is superior to others.Lossless was also something that deeply interested Steve Jobs, so I think Apple would want this to be for everyone simply in his honor.
EDIT: All the other Apple news sites seem to be interpreting this the same as me.It blows me away how much Apple drags their feet on the obvious like lossless, podcasts and gaming. Things that should have been taken seriously a decade ago.
When did Mastered for iTunes roll out? I’m trying to remember if it was lossless. -
Intel Windows not coming to M1 VMware Fusion, ARM Windows licensing unclear
dysamoria said:lkrupp said:If you need to run Windows then buy a Windows PC.
Unfortunately, gaming on Macs is nowhere near the level of gaming on Windows. It used to be that we could have a Mac for both Mac OS and Windows. That was cool. The setup didn’t need to be 100% equal to a Windows PC in performance, just be comparable.
Sadly, there hasn’t been a suitable desktop Mac in almost a decade (GPU, heat, etc). Now Apple is moving away from Macs even being able to run intel Windows software at all. Result: own two computers again (consoles can bite my shiny metal ass).
It would be nice if Apple at least sold a standalone display [for an affordable headless workstation-class desktop], so that when I finally can buy a new gaming PC (GPU shortages & pricing are insane), I don’t ALSO need to have TWO displays on my already-crowded desk. Guess I need to find a usable USB KVM switch, soon. Most affordable KVM switches I’ve seen are trash and the well-built ones are rarely happy to work cross-platform & USB.I never run Windows on Mac but who are these people running Windows on M1 and claiming it’s 2x faster than on an actual Windows machine?People are raving. What am I missing here? -
Initial engraved AirTag preorders sold out in minutes
22july2013 said:Although the limit of four characters engraving seems to prohibit placing a phone number on the AirTag, I noticed there were lots of two-digit emojis to choose from so I was able to engrave my 7 digit phone number on mine. The highest two digit emoji is 50 so some phone numbers will be unengravable, however the fact that a phone number has only 7 digits, not 8, means you can still find a way to select some 7-digit phone numbers that contain high digits. There were two ways I could have engraved my number because of this trick. This means people can contact me if they find my AirTag even if I haven't put mine into "Lost Mode."This is ridiculous of Apple. They should allow 2 sentences of text.
For example:
This is my dog!
😢 Please return (555) 555-5555StrangeDays said:skippingrock said:Or initial engraving limitation for it’s sudden sellout was a brilliant marketing plan to generate even more interest… but who knows but them.
When a product does well someone always says this “artificial supply” crap.
Does it even work? Why would Apple sell 100,000 and hold back millions of units just to “hype the product”. That’s so stupid logically. If something is sold out it frustrates the consumer causing them to buy an alternative. Especially if it’s a b-day gift.