sconosciuto

About

Username
sconosciuto
Joined
Visits
78
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
2,221
Badges
2
Posts
394
  • Lufthansa now embraces AirTags, since it couldn't ban them

    Airtags managed to do what decades of passenger complaints about airline baggage handling incompetence and flat-out theft that was just considered a cost of doing business couldn’t do: force airlines to up their baggage handling game and stop BEAZENLY LYING to customers about their bags.
    watto_cobrabyronl
  • Lufthansa now embraces AirTags, since it couldn't ban them

    “Safe face” = didn’t vote for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party
    watto_cobra
  • Lufthansa now embraces AirTags, since it couldn't ban them

    amar99 said:
    The airline tried to "safe face"?
    They were just towing the line for all intensive purposes.
    dominikhoffmannroundaboutnowwatto_cobrabyronl
  • How TSMC beat Intel to be Apple's main chip foundry

    Enjoyed the backstory but really, I doubt Intel was ever seriously in consideration. Their arrogance with respect to customer requests is completely unsurprising.
    watto_cobradanoxtht
  • Why Apple won't buy TikTok, even to attract younger users

    mbmoore said:
    It makes sense to me.  Buying T-T will attract a whole new raft of scrutiny from Uncle Sam. Given the changes in Twitter and Facebook as they move to be more Trumpian Friendly, T-T's new owners will be expected to follow suit OR face 'the Spanish Inquisition' from Congress. The Oversight Committee could tie Apple up in lawsuits for years if they owned T-T and didn't start licking No 47's high heels.
    As if they didn't have a big enough target on their backs as it is...

    The same arguments would apply if Apple started its own search engine.  I am sure that we will soon start seeing Google change its promotion algorithms to put his latest grift subject at the top of all result sets.

    IMHO, it is far better for Apple to stay well clear of that part of the DC swamp. There be leopards ready to eat Tim Cook's face. 
    It isn’t just about being Trump-friendly. It’s about ceasing the almost outright ban on views that oppose extreme left dogma. Regardless of political persuasion, social media platforms should be neutral, allowing the free flow of information. The only rules that should exist are ones that enforce current laws regarding pornography, inciting of riots, and personal threats.
    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL


    is Newsmax required to be neutral?

    where the hell do you get off demanding the government enforce “neutrality” upon a website YOU USE FOR FREE, KAREN!

    The First Amendment permits social media to be as biased as they wish. Don’t like it? Don’t go there boomer.
    ronn