Detnator
About
- Username
- Detnator
- Joined
- Visits
- 44
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 620
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 287
Reactions
-
Two September Apple events planned, claims supply chain
richardk32 said:I'd rather have a larger screen iMac in the pipeline. 27"? 30"? M1+? My late 2013 continues to be quite the workhorse, but come September it will be two iterations of macOS behind.
My reasons:
The 21” 4K moving to 24” 4.5K and the existence of the 32” 6K, both setting a “we’re now making bigger displays than before” precedent, plus the inclusion of some of the XDR tech in even the high end iPad Pro.I can’t see it going any other way.Still, I agree with the article and the speculation that the ASi MBP’s are coming very soon, and the inference that they will be long before they get to the high end iMac and then Mac Pro. Those two will be the last two, and not till next year. -
Rumor: New MacBook Pro to debut at WWDC 2021
crowley said:Detnator said:crowley said:thedba said:crowley said:thedba said:crowley said:thedba said:fastasleep said:commentzilla said:
If you cannot remember to bring your USB-C hub on the go, you'll probably forget your power supply, wallet and keys too.
I'll take the HDMI port return if it doesn't reduce the number of other TB3 ports, I'll never ever use it but it won't offend me by being there.
Real professionals will find an elegant solution like this for home/office use, where with just one cable you get power and all the legacy ports your heart desires
Or if you don't want to pay Thunderbolt prices, maybe something like this will do the trick.
It even has a VGA port.
But in the end, the 1st image above generates clicks while the latter two are just boring SOLUTIONS.
I say that as a CalDigit TB3 Hub user, who also has an Anker 5 port dongle for away from home work. They're both great bits of kit, but if I could get the ports on a MacBook I'd definitely prefer it that way.
As for the cable mess you speak of, connecting 5 peripherals total, sticking out from the sides of your laptop does not create one?
Cables that all stick out from the side of your laptop are easy to manage, can even be cable tied together possibly. Take a look at the UtechSmart hub that you posted a picture of. If it's fully loaded then cables will be splayed out in all directions, making a mess.But while you may consider HDMI an esssential port, someone else may need USBA and someone further down the road, Ethernet. And let’s not forget the SD card slot.You see where this is going?And sure, my inferences are no more your responsibility than other people’s preferences are. Not asking for them to be, (although I’d potentially argue that “responsibility” isn’t really what we’re going for in a forum discussion, but perhaps jot today).I haven’t done a full analysis of all your comments but I guess you’re right, nothing I can find in a brief review just now seems to show you saying “Apple should do…”, only things like “I’d definitely prefer it if Apple did…” (I wonder if that’s very careful and deliberate, or just your nature. Just curious).So fair enough. I guess if anything, in mine and others’ defense, we’re looking - preferably - to discuss solutions and ideas that might work for everyone or most. Sure, your preference is as valid as anyone’s but the enthusiasm with which you express yours, especially in the context of a thread in which others with similar arguments to yours (eg. Mr H and MplsM in this conversation) express them in a “Apple should…” way — it’s hard not to take it as “this is the way it should be”, unless we simply take it as rather self absorbed. Again in my/our defense, your comments like this also often come in threads where others are in fact narrow-mindedly saying “Apple should…” and without careful analysis it’s difficult not seeing your comments as supporting that.
But before you take offense at those last statements (especially “self-absorbed — note I didn’t say you are, only that it can be hard not to take your comments that way) again you’re right. If I read your words exactly and take them exactly as they are, anything beyond that is inference (including any suggestion of self-absorbed) and so that’s on us — you’re right that that’s not your problem or responsibility. Forgive me/us if I/we fail to make that analysis every time we reply to you. (And i don’t mean that sarcastically, or anything like that. Im serious).
PS. I added a lot to my post you replied to (didn’t change or take away anything). Your take on the rest of it could be interesting. -
Rumor: New MacBook Pro to debut at WWDC 2021
crowley said:thedba said:crowley said:thedba said:crowley said:thedba said:fastasleep said:commentzilla said:
If you cannot remember to bring your USB-C hub on the go, you'll probably forget your power supply, wallet and keys too.
I'll take the HDMI port return if it doesn't reduce the number of other TB3 ports, I'll never ever use it but it won't offend me by being there.
Real professionals will find an elegant solution like this for home/office use, where with just one cable you get power and all the legacy ports your heart desires
Or if you don't want to pay Thunderbolt prices, maybe something like this will do the trick.
It even has a VGA port.
But in the end, the 1st image above generates clicks while the latter two are just boring SOLUTIONS.
I say that as a CalDigit TB3 Hub user, who also has an Anker 5 port dongle for away from home work. They're both great bits of kit, but if I could get the ports on a MacBook I'd definitely prefer it that way.
As for the cable mess you speak of, connecting 5 peripherals total, sticking out from the sides of your laptop does not create one?
Cables that all stick out from the side of your laptop are easy to manage, can even be cable tied together possibly. Take a look at the UtechSmart hub that you posted a picture of. If it's fully loaded then cables will be splayed out in all directions, making a mess.But while you may consider HDMI an esssential port, someone else may need USBA and someone further down the road, Ethernet. And let’s not forget the SD card slot.You see where this is going?Meanwhile…thedba said:
So if I understand you correctly, your ideal high end MBP would have what?MplsP said:
First, if a cable is ‘life changing,’ you need a better life, but to the point, what USB C does is trade the convenience of one port for the inconvenience of using adapters for everything.fastasleep said:
The ability to have a single cable to your laptop that provides power and breaks out several cables you'd otherwise be plugging and unplugging every time you switch locations is a life changing thing for the positive. Not sure why you'd fight that.crowley said:
I know how much my hubs cost thanks. Point is, if the ports had been on my MacBook I wouldn't have needed to buy them, and probably wouldn't have, saving myself a significant amount of money.thedba said:
A fair chunk? The TB3 dock $299 the USBC hub $99. The combinations are too numerous to mention here and the prices vary anywhere from $49 to $349. You only buy what you need.crowley said:
Boring solutions that can end up costing a fair chunk on top of your MacBook price, take up a load of space in your bag, and because of the port layout end up making a cable mess.thedba said:
While the sensationalist internet punditry likes to present a hell on earth that looks like thisfastasleep said:
Exactly. They have little USB-C to HDMI keychains, and if it were my job to give presentations regularly I'd just have one of those on me at all times. Anyone complaining about forgetting stuff that's required for their job, well not sure that's Apple's problem.commentzilla said:
If you cannot remember to bring your USB-C hub on the go, you'll probably forget your power supply, wallet and keys too.
I'll take the HDMI port return if it doesn't reduce the number of other TB3 ports, I'll never ever use it but it won't offend me by being there.
Real professionals will find an elegant solution like this for home/office use, where with just one cable you get power and all the legacy ports your heart desires
Or if you don't want to pay Thunderbolt prices, maybe something like this will do the trick.
It even has a VGA port.
But in the end, the 1st image above generates clicks while the latter two are just boring SOLUTIONS.
I say that as a CalDigit TB3 Hub user, who also has an Anker 5 port dongle for away from home work. They're both great bits of kit, but if I could get the ports on a MacBook I'd definitely prefer it that way.
As for the cable mess you speak of, connecting 5 peripherals total, sticking out from the sides of your laptop does not create one?
Cables that all stick out from the side of your laptop are easy to manage, can even be cable tied together possibly. Take a look at the UtechSmart hub that you posted a picture of. If it's fully loaded then cables will be splayed out in all directions, making a mess.You also fail to note that USB C is not all roses. There is one port, but the function of that port is undefined so you never know what features that port has. Beyond that, you don’t know what capabilities any given USB C cable has. USB 3? Power delivery? How much power? TB? TB 3 or 4? In some ways, one can argue that USB C is worse because of the added confusion.There are some people on this site who’ve evidently never forgotten anything, for whom spending an extra $300 on a hub to make that life changing cable actually do what they need it to do is a negligible sum of pocket change, and for whom carrying around extra equipment is more convenient than just carrying their laptop. For the rest of the world it’s an inconvenience at best and even more frustrating when you consider it’s functionality that virtually every other laptop has, even a POS $250 Lenovo chrome book.
2 or 4 TB4 ports, 1 or 2 USBA ports, one HDMI port, one SD Card slot and one ethernet port. So in total 6-9 ports.
I suggest then you stop looking at Apple laptops because I doubt they’ll ever make everyone happy.mr. h said:
What you're doing here is demonstrating quite nicely what thunderbolt is best at - allowing a connection of a plethora of stuff with a single cable - I agree it's a great solution. However, it's not so helpful if you frequently need to connect to *other people's stuff* like a projector or other display where the display-end of the HDMI cable is captive so you can't use your own cable, or someone gives you a usb memory stick to put a file on to, or a memory card to read some picture off. In these cases, having the port directly on the MBP is unquestionably more convenient, cheaper, tidier, more portable, and immune to problems with user's memory (forgetting to bring the crucial dongle).fastasleep said:
"Life changing" is a figure of speech. If you move between multiple desks on a near-daily basis, sometimes multiple times a day, having a single cable where previously you had say three or four in my case is most definitely an *improvement*.MplsP said:
First, if a cable is ‘life changing,’ you need a better life, but to the point, what USB C does is trade the convenience of one port for the inconvenience of using adapters for everything.fastasleep said:
The ability to have a single cable to your laptop that provides power and breaks out several cables you'd otherwise be plugging and unplugging every time you switch locations is a life changing thing for the positive. Not sure why you'd fight that.crowley said:
I know how much my hubs cost thanks. Point is, if the ports had been on my MacBook I wouldn't have needed to buy them, and probably wouldn't have, saving myself a significant amount of money.thedba said:
A fair chunk? The TB3 dock $299 the USBC hub $99. The combinations are too numerous to mention here and the prices vary anywhere from $49 to $349. You only buy what you need.crowley said:
Boring solutions that can end up costing a fair chunk on top of your MacBook price, take up a load of space in your bag, and because of the port layout end up making a cable mess.thedba said:
While the sensationalist internet punditry likes to present a hell on earth that looks like thisfastasleep said:
Exactly. They have little USB-C to HDMI keychains, and if it were my job to give presentations regularly I'd just have one of those on me at all times. Anyone complaining about forgetting stuff that's required for their job, well not sure that's Apple's problem.commentzilla said:
If you cannot remember to bring your USB-C hub on the go, you'll probably forget your power supply, wallet and keys too.
I'll take the HDMI port return if it doesn't reduce the number of other TB3 ports, I'll never ever use it but it won't offend me by being there.
Real professionals will find an elegant solution like this for home/office use, where with just one cable you get power and all the legacy ports your heart desires
Or if you don't want to pay Thunderbolt prices, maybe something like this will do the trick.
It even has a VGA port.
But in the end, the 1st image above generates clicks while the latter two are just boring SOLUTIONS.
I say that as a CalDigit TB3 Hub user, who also has an Anker 5 port dongle for away from home work. They're both great bits of kit, but if I could get the ports on a MacBook I'd definitely prefer it that way.
As for the cable mess you speak of, connecting 5 peripherals total, sticking out from the sides of your laptop does not create one?
Cables that all stick out from the side of your laptop are easy to manage, can even be cable tied together possibly. Take a look at the UtechSmart hub that you posted a picture of. If it's fully loaded then cables will be splayed out in all directions, making a mess.You also fail to note that USB C is not all roses. There is one port, but the function of that port is undefined so you never know what features that port has. Beyond that, you don’t know what capabilities any given USB C cable has. USB 3? Power delivery? How much power? TB? TB 3 or 4? In some ways, one can argue that USB C is worse because of the added confusion.There are some people on this site who’ve evidently never forgotten anything, for whom spending an extra $300 on a hub to make that life changing cable actually do what they need it to do is a negligible sum of pocket change, and for whom carrying around extra equipment is more convenient than just carrying their laptop. For the rest of the world it’s an inconvenience at best and even more frustrating when you consider it’s functionality that virtually every other laptop has, even a POS $250 Lenovo chrome book.
Figuring any of those things out has not been difficult by any means — maybe you find it confusing, but I don't.
I'm talking about a dock you have at your desk(s) with everything set up once and stays where it is, I don't carry anything around with me. My power source, display and its USB-A power (for the ACD 30" DVI to mDP adapter), my audio interface, headphones/SD card/Ethernet/extra USB ports if I need them — are all in a single box under my monitor with cables tucked out of the way out of sight except for the single cable going to my MBP. Why you'd want to have to manually plug all that shit in every time when there's a simple tidy solution is beyond me. I set this all up once and generally never have to touch it, and it saves me a LOT of time and frustration messing with cables, so the "inconvenience" is really manufactured outrage here. Enjoy your POS Lenovo Chromebook and it's "functionality" lol.
Hence, clearly the optimum solution is to have thunderbolt ports AND the other ports. I don't recall ANYONE ever complaining that 2 thunderbolt 2 ports weren't enough on the older-generation Pros. I think the ideal would be four thunderbolt ports, one USB-A, one (full size) HDMI, a MagSafe power connector (but device can also be charged via any of the thunderbolt ports), and an SD card slot. This would annoy considerably fewer people. From the rumours, it seems that this is quite likely what we're going to get, probably minus the USB-A port.A few months late to this conversation (I missed this and a few other threads at the time) but in case anyone is still watching this thread… Between the three of you, and few others…
You suggest that an extra $349 for all the extra ports is an added expense. However there are $49 and $99 options.You suggest that having to carry around another device means more weight etc to carry around however if you put all the ports everyone might want into the MBP then you’re carrying around the ports YOU want and a bunch of ports you don’t want (but someone else wants), which compromises something. Makes it bigger and heavier or replaces battery life or something else.And you’re paying for all those ports you don’t want (but someone else does) when you shouldn’t have to.As someone pointed out there are inexpensive keyring sized options that contain one or two ports that can cover just your needs without inflicting your needs on those who have different needs.Alternatively there are options like the many at https://www.hypershop.com/ that cover every price point and need imaginable and if you pick the one that has only the ports you want then it’s no more weight than if all the ports everyone could possibly want were included in the Mac.Then there’s those of us who have switched all our external devices to USB-C (and don’t do presentations with other people’s projectors etc.) and have no need for anything other than USB-C and so don’t need socks at all. Of course that’s the ideal scenario for TB3-only Macs, but acknowledged that’s not everyone. Or the scenario described by @fastasleep where one cable connects everything at once and the dock and cable mess is tidily away.The point of the thunderbolt ports is the flexibility and choice it provides the users without adding stuff that in every case someone won’t want (extra cost and extra size and weight). I agree the cable confusion with USB-C (different cables doing different things with same connector) is far from ideal but there are other solutions to that than giving up on USB-C and going back to all the other single use ports.By the way, I complained about having only two thunderbolt ports in the older Macs and a bunch of ports I didn’t want. In fact in 2014 I wrote to Tim Cook and specifically suggested something like what wound up being the 2016 MBP. I doubt it was purely my request that brought about those machines, so either a bunch of other people did that as well or it was already on the cards anyway and my email perhaps just confirmed that at least someone wants it that way.With only four (or if I had my way it would be 6 or 8) thunderbolt ports and nothing else in the laptop makes the Mac as versatile as possible with nothing in it that people don’t want.Thunderbolt ports are the pinnacle of providing the most versatility to everyone. By all means express your preferences, but Apple can’t accommodate them without disappointing a lot more other people. And as described above with the myriad of dock/hub options, your needs can still be accommodated by those small to tiny portable hubs with, frankly, a lot less trouble than you’re espousing.Each of you have arguments that are fair enough for what YOU want, but the approach Apple would have to take to accommodate what YOU want compromises what many others want, and vice versa. There exists no combination of ports that will satisfy everyone without including a bunch of extra ports that others don’t want.My challenge to each of you:Let’s go beyond expressing personal opinions, and look past just your own wants. Considering your wants and everyone else’s, what should Apple actually do? What is an actual solution to this issue that will give everyone what they want without compromise, or if not that then give the vast majority what’s most useful with the least compromise to everyone else. Oared we just ranting about our own personal preferences (fine if that’s what it is and we’re honest about it) Or is a sensible conversation about real solutions possible? -
The critics were impossibly wrong: Apple CEO Tim Cook was -- and is -- the right person fo...
Peza said:OutdoorAppDeveloper said:Tim Cook deserves a lot of praise. From a customer standpoint, Apple has reliably delivered the products it promised even during the chip shortage. Apple rarely overpromises on its products capabilities. I do wish that Apple took more risks, although perhaps not at the "bet the company" level of Steve Jobs. Apple has the opportunity to disrupt the entire computer industry with the M1 and M2 processors but to do that they would have to draw far outside the lines. Steve would have created a Mac Nano by now costing around $300 with a M1 processor. It would have turned the industry upside down as the Windows world has literally nothing to compete with that. In other areas, such as VR, Apple is far behind the rest of the industry. Perhaps their AR glasses will redefine the market the way the iPhone did. -
The critics were impossibly wrong: Apple CEO Tim Cook was -- and is -- the right person fo...
entropys said:Cook is definitely one of the world’s best CEOs, although I find it hard to forgive the languishment of the Mac for so many years.2014 to 2020 was years of high priced, ordinary machines, that only survived on brand loyalty and iPhone halo. Those macs definitely could have been much better, and functionally were not as good as the macs that came before. To this day I reckon the plan was for the iPad to replace the Mac, and when that didn’t work out, the M1 is plan B. Note the IPP has the M1 in it, which suggests it was long term plan, and the lack of redesigned MBA and MBP implies a rushed development for phase 1. I’m glad it happened though, as the growth in Mac sales means the Mac will get love again.
1. Familiarity. If it talks like a duck and swims like a duck… People may resist the internal change if a significant external change happens at the same time. Notably Steve did the same thing with the first Intel Macs and the same thing happened with the PowerPC switch. Not rushed in the slightest.
2. With Apple switching the smallest Macs first, it also proved a point. If the M1 chip and other related internals are the only thing that changed, with the designs the same, and then performance, battery life etc. see the enormous improvements they’ve seen, in the same designs as the previous models, then there’s no argument that the chip and related internal changes are the reason.
Not rushed at all. Smart design and smart business.