phoenix1386

I have no idea why "This feature isn’t available to users in the European Union, United Kingdom, or India."

So long as users are merging two accounts in the same region, it should not pose a problem. We may argue about EU and UK, but India? That's just one damn country with a few states.

A clinically deranged person and convicted felon has been handed the power to affect the lives and change the trajectories of nearly everyone else on the planet. A man-child who will not pay for either his crimes or actions prior to becoming President, during presidency and/ or after leaving office. Heh..

Meanwhile, if it were another citizen who did something meagre as stole something worth even a few hundred Dollars, could face prison time and will seldom be able to get a dignified job owing to their "record".

The President can distort names like a petty child; Newscum anyne? But, dare someone say something about him? Democracy at work here, of course. The greatest!

Point being, the only thing we know for certain will happen is that every single person in the world will suffer one way or another, be affected in one way or another, thanks to a few million people putting this man in the office. All of us will be paying one way or another. For some, cars may become expensive, for some, food may become expensive. For some in the world, they would certainly lose their lives because of the man shutting USAID down. All of us will be affected, one way or another.

The author is a veteran Apple evangelist of over 15 years. If they say MS is 37%, it must be.

Those who are not Apple evangelists would know that at day's close, MSFT was 3.19T whereas Apple was 3.46T.

Agreed on most everything except for that the innovation seemingly continued. macOS does NOT bring enough to the table each year to warrant being released each year. Apple could do with biennial releases just fine, security updates and bug fixes aside. It might even help with the quality of OS that has been on the decline over the years. Anyone who is not a self-proclaimed 'evangelist' would give an honest analysis, but I believe this piece was more opinion than fact, so it passes.

To say that "Between 2015 and 2020 — half a decade — Microsoft contentedly sat on Windows 10. In 2011 it delivered Windows 11" seems to suggest that it was wrong of them or helplessness or anything at Microsoft to not deliver Windows 11. I'd think that every company has its own goals and plans. Comparing is futile so far as trying to make one sound better goes, with regard to development cycle. It is not that both were developing and doing the same things but somehow Microsoft sat contentedly while Apple delivered on it. It makes no sense to say this sentence except to validate and justify the 'evangelist' title.

"That same year, Apple released macOS Monterey (12) followed by macOS Ventura (13) in 2022, macOS (14) Sonoma in 2023 and macOS (15) Sequoia last year. Nobody's worried about whether Apple will offer any new innovation for its Mac platform this year."

And what is the extent of difference between these 4 releases to have warranted 4 whole number releases and not just point number increments?