jfabula1

About

Username
jfabula1
Joined
Visits
32
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
343
Badges
0
Posts
241
  • Apple is inventing a revolutionary car audio system for Apple Car

    iqatedo said:
    Volvo is owned by Geely but publicly listed and a potential takeover target. Were Apple to buy Volvo and re-build all of the non-realtime architecture and software that would be brilliant. They use android currently. I've looked at Volvo's upcoming EX series cars. They are in one case at least, cheaper than the "equivalent" Teslas and in that case better performing. One review by a Volvo aficionado however, highlighted the usual android issues. The driver facing software in his experience was laggy and buggy. Volvo's electric sales however, are growing rapidly and the company intends to build vehicles in the US. What do people here think, a good fit?
    Nope….Gelly is Chinese co. 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple Vision Pro research and early work was hidden in plain sight

    JP234 said:
    There should be, somewhere out there, a market analysis to determine the point of diminishing returns comparing markup/volume ratios.

    "From" $3499 is too expensive for what VisionPro represents at this time. Yeah, I'm impressed with it. A lot. Am I impressed enough to buy one without asking, "Will this add $3,500 (or more) of value to my work or home life?" The answer is, right now VP offers nothing that is unavailable in some other, albeit less impressive format. Yet. There are plenty of ways to spend "from" $3,500 (plus tax, lens correction and AppleCare) that would equal or surpass the benefit I'd derive from a headset.

    Dump the floating windows. The market for VP as a work tool is too niche. The transparency feature seems impressive at first, but you could also just take them off when you want to talk to someone in the room. Is that worth an extra whatever? And why do we need to create an artificial representation of ourselves NOT wearing the headset when using Facetime? Let your contacts see that you're wearing them, and envy you. Or take them off.

    Do what's necessary to get the price to $1,999, and add an eSIM. Now there's mass market appeal. Keep the $3,499 model for the upscale customer, call it VisionPro Ultra or something so they'll have something to brag about.
    That price is worth my one month mortgage payment, definitely not for me. I will be outside looking IN. 
    JP234grandact73
  • Apple is the world's biggest company at $3 trillion -- again

    Im still hoping that Apple will introduce the non invasive device connected to Apple watch for detecting blood sugar, that would sky rocket the watch demand….i heard that Tim is wearing the prototype before….big hope is coming. 
    cg27
  • Second Apple Watch Ultra due this fall on Apple's product roadmap

    mike1 said:
    designr said:
    Crossing my fingers for some upgraded battery experience (e.g., longer charge life and possibly faster charge turnaround) for the Series 9 Watch. That would make it easier to be a true all-day wearable.

    An "action" button (a la Watch Ultra) might be nice to program for a specific feature (e.g., start a timer or a workout our something).

    Who doesn't get a day out of a Watch with a full charge?!
    Ha who what?? It lasted me 2 days on ultra….you just have to turn off things that you don’t use all the time.
    williamlondon
  • Apple still has a lot of secret apps for Vision Pro in the works

    badmonk said:
    Work feverishly my devils.
    Bwahahahahaha…..devil laugh 
    watto_cobra