VictorMortimer
About
- Username
- VictorMortimer
- Joined
- Visits
- 10
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 503
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 280
Reactions
-
Amateur performers embrace VR porn on Apple Vision Pro
dominikhoffmann said:This is really disgusting. Yet another way to cheapen the marital act!
-
Apple TV with a camera is the rumor that will never die
Just what I need, another camera to tape over.Also, what's with everybody wanting soundbars? I've never understood it. I've got REAL speakers, with actual separation. I haven't done the overhead channels, but I've got front left, right, and center, rear left and right, and a reasonably large sub. You're never going to get that from a 3' long plastic box with tiny speakers. -
Protesters close Chicago Apple Store over Palestinian employee firing
-
Tesla wants Apple's help to beat Autopilot death lawsuit
meterestnz said:VictorMortimer said:Xed said:bobolicious said:"the car maker believes that Autopilot is safe to use, and that it only becomes a danger when drivers are not paying attention to the road"Define 'auto'...?
On the one hand, fuck Tesla and Musk's lies about Autopilot's capabilities, but on the other, autopilot doesn't mean the driver doesn't have to be aware, present, etc. Airplanes have had autopilot for over a century and yet we're still not flying airplanes without pilots in them. Well, except for the drone category and those are controlled by a remote operator. I'm assuming that if a commercial airliner crashed and the NTSB discovered that it was because the pilot was playing games you wouldn't be defending the pilot with a comment like "define 'auto'?"
I love all the automation I have in my car which allow for more relaxed and safer driving, but I understand that I'm still required to have situational awareness with those automated systems in place inside my automobile. Anything less is just asking to be a Darwin Award nominee.Turdla literally sells cars with something that they call "full self driving".Does that imply to you that a human driver still needs to be aware or present?The word "autopilot" isn't confusing to actual pilots, but it can be to the general public. But if Cessna started selling "full self flying", I guarantee you that even a licensed pilot would expect that would be a fully automated aircraft. I also guarantee the FAA wouldn't allow anything named that to be sold if it wasn't capable of full automation.And they still screw it up sometimes. https://aviationweek.com/business-aviation/safety-ops-regulation/turkish-crew-starts-descent-too-late-leading-crashThat wasn't an inexperienced crew. Would they have lived if they had been stick flying? Dunno. But full self flying does not exist yet, the regulators still won't even allow single-pilot operation beyond small planes no matter how much the airlines want it.Partial automation can be dangerous. And that's just due to human nature, we're NOT great at taking over from the automated system in an emergency, because our brains zone out. Years ago when I was learning to drive, one of the big things everybody was warned about was "freeway hypnosis" where you're staring ahead for hours in what feels like a very non-threatening situation, and if something goes wrong it takes much longer to put your full attention on the problem. The recommendation was to make sure you looked around periodically to try to not let your brain partially sleep. And that's when the only automation available in any car was cruse control - just autothrottle, no lane keep assist, no collision avoidance, no ABS, no autobrake, no traction control.I think the reality is that these automated steering systems that are designed to disengage when something goes wrong are a huge mistake. It needs to be all or nothing, a system that's good enough that I can recline and take a nap, or it shouldn't take over steering AT ALL. I'm honestly better with it in aircraft than cars, mostly because pilots are better trained than drivers, but even they screw up by relying too much on the partial automation sometimes and not being ready to take over when it gets things wrong.I'd love to be able to get in my car and push a go button. But the halfass crap that Turdla is selling is not that system, and given that they're still trying to do an all-camera setup without radar or lidar, it's NEVER going to be that system. -
Tesla wants Apple's help to beat Autopilot death lawsuit
Xed said:bobolicious said:"the car maker believes that Autopilot is safe to use, and that it only becomes a danger when drivers are not paying attention to the road"Define 'auto'...?
On the one hand, fuck Tesla and Musk's lies about Autopilot's capabilities, but on the other, autopilot doesn't mean the driver doesn't have to be aware, present, etc. Airplanes have had autopilot for over a century and yet we're still not flying airplanes without pilots in them. Well, except for the drone category and those are controlled by a remote operator. I'm assuming that if a commercial airliner crashed and the NTSB discovered that it was because the pilot was playing games you wouldn't be defending the pilot with a comment like "define 'auto'?"
I love all the automation I have in my car which allow for more relaxed and safer driving, but I understand that I'm still required to have situational awareness with those automated systems in place inside my automobile. Anything less is just asking to be a Darwin Award nominee.Turdla literally sells cars with something that they call "full self driving".Does that imply to you that a human driver still needs to be aware or present?The word "autopilot" isn't confusing to actual pilots, but it can be to the general public. But if Cessna started selling "full self flying", I guarantee you that even a licensed pilot would expect that would be a fully automated aircraft. I also guarantee the FAA wouldn't allow anything named that to be sold if it wasn't capable of full automation.