cg27

entropys said:

I would worry about a magnetic attachment for the band to be all that secure in many types of use cases. Plus thieves.

A new band attachment redesign to me would be about adding functionality to the bands themselves.  A connection within the attachment point to say, add batteries, add sensors etc.

Yeah just like the first AppleWatch (Series 0?) back in 2015 had the 7 (?) pin connection inside one of the two barrels that hold the strap.  Not sure when they did away with that ‘diagnostic port’.  Always thought it would be for enabling optional band functionality.  Seemed expensive to have just for diagnostics.

darkvader said:

It's cute that AI still thinks there's ever going to be an Apple car.

Reluctantly have to agree, Tesla is so far ahead of everyone it’ll be difficult to catch up let alone surpass.  Unless of course some company leapfrog’s with a cost effective Solid State Battery (Toyota?).

Yup completely superficial mistake in this case, but if it were airbag deployment based on deceleration rate or a Mars mission then it becomes a little more important.  A Mars mission actually failed due to lack of proper distance conversion.

Not 630 miles from Apple Park, more like 400.  You had me wondering how tall California is lol.

puiz666 said:

Yeah, please ruin the one Apple platform where typing is not a traumatic experience. 

LOL your post reminded me of the New Zealand director Taika Waititi’s Oscar acceptance speech where he literally called out Apple for the lousy Butterfly keyboard.