macarena

About

Username
macarena
Joined
Visits
34
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
172
Badges
1
Posts
364
  • Netflix kills in-app subscription option for iPhone & iPad users

    Apple will crib if Qualcomm wants 4% royalties that are tied to the cost of the phone - and not to the much lower cost of the chipset.

    But Apple wants a 15% cut of ONGOING subscription costs of NetFlix, even though the only service provided by Apple is hosting the app and delivering it. Which is a one time service. That too, with a policy that prevents customers from downloading from elsewhere.

    One day whatever Apple wins from Qualcomm will be lost multiple times over because of this policy.

    Apple’s policies were OK and acceptable when it was a small struggling company - not when it is the largest company in the planet. Maybe the DoJ or someone else should step in, and make it a smaller company once again.
    williamlondon
  • Netflix kills in-app subscription option for iPhone & iPad users

    Google, FB, etc make money off violating customer privacy, and we think of that as bad.

    Apple engages in unfair business practices, but it’s ok?

    How different is this from Microsoft making IE the default browser on Windows? MS at least didn’t charge Netscape anything. And still got canned for it.

    Apple is attracting too much bad karma and some day this will all come back to bite Apple. Waiting for that moment.
    williamlondon
  • Netflix kills in-app subscription option for iPhone & iPad users

    This is someday going to come back and bite Apple - because it will be seen as an Unfair Business Practise.

    Apple claims services revenues are growing rapidly, but this is clearly not healthy. This is the sort of thing that a court or the Justice Department can take cognizance of, and hit them with a really big fine. Maybe even force a split of the company, so that Apple Services becomes a separate and standalone company.

    This policy might still be justifiable if Apple isn’t in the streaming business - but now, it’s an extremely uncompetitive practise.

    Apple deserves to be split up, so that there is fairness all around.
    williamlondon
  • Apple says 'looking into' video of apparent iPhone 7 Plus meltdown

    Karma catching up? For a long time, Apple has been tempting karma - selling overpriced lightning cables to customers whose cables frayed out within months, soldering RAM into the motherboards, so that customers have no choice but to accept Apple's rip off pricing, etc. When a company goes out of its way to screw its own loyal customers, you can be assured that its day of reckoning is coming. It is ridiculous that a company that makes such humongous profits and that charges such a stiff price for admission into their walled garden finds the need to rip off even its own loyal customers this way. And not just the company, even Apple shareholders and Apple fan boys rubbed their hands in glee when Samsung had a huge loss from the Note 7 recall. There's lot of bad karma in there too. Apple's greed will only get worse. They will keep pushing the envelope, trying to make the phones thinner - even if the wimpy batteries struggle to last the whole day! They only care for making these devices as thin and as light as possible. Obviously, all that thinness and lightness is making the devices vulnerable to such problems. It is indeed unbelievable how many people hate Apple. And how even a lot of Apple's customers hate the company.
    avon b7caliviclauyyc
  • Microsoft claims Windows licensing gains are chipping into Apple's 'premium' computer mark...

    A high pressure assembly line, that produces devices at the ridiculous rates needed to meet high demand, also increases cost of production massively.

    Some of these costs would be for overtime paid to workers, paying higher prices to secure aggressive component supplies, air freight instead of sea freight for shipping components and finished devices, overworked retail store employees, and even goodwill costs of providing doughnuts and coffee for endless lines of people who will probably not get a device anyway!

    If demand is somewhat muted but still very reasonable, all of these extra costs are avoided - and the bottom line is boosted.

    When you think about the overall implications, it actually makes immense sense for Apple to engineer a marginal drop in volumes for a few years, till everything is streamlined and the higher volumes are possible even with upgraded specs without paying ridiculous costs.
    williamlondon