sandor
About
- Username
- sandor
- Joined
- Visits
- 111
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,955
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 670
Reactions
-
Netflix wants to crack down on users sharing passwords
davidw said:sandor said:tommikele said:22july2013 said:My opinion is that Netflix could make more money by lowering their monthly rate but prohibit account sharing (simultaneous streaming.) I would probably subscribe if they did that. If I had a family of twelve, I would probably like the account sharing surcharge, but I don't.
Just for testing, they could introduce an account type that was cheaper but blocked sharing. See how popular it would be.
Charge each user of a stream. If your account has four streams you pay four times $X then who cares who is using them. Fifth person tries to sign on, they can't. One price per stream.
This is, in fact, how Netflix charges - an amount of $$ per month gets you a certain number of simultaneous streams @ a certain quality level.
Why does Netflix need to make themselves the arbiter of family & existence locations as well?
I rent a car with 4 passenger seats.
The rental car company doesn't dictate to me who is allowed to sit in them.
But if you pay for 2 streams, someone on the sofa (like your son) that don't like want you're watching, can go watch something else in another room that have a TV. Or go to a friends home and watch something else on a mobile device or computer logged on to your account. What your son is not suppose to do, is log on to his friend's TV, with your account.
Paying for 2 streams would be like you renting 2 cars. But when you pay for 2 streams, it's not twice as much. When you rent 2 cars, it would most likely be close to double the cost of renting 1 car. That would be like paying for two 1 stream accounts.
Yes, the rental car analogy is not 100%...
But, in the end, the passengers' use of the vehicle are not dictated by the rental company, rather the driver (ostensibly the one paying the fee) dictates the use .
I could rent (or lease) one car & utilize it for transportation of all my neighbors & their families.
I can meet a portion of their transportation needs with my access to a vehicle.
If it traveled @ the speed of light, i could zip them around to college, vacation trips, a tent in the woods on the Appalachian trail, etc.
So yes, there are limitations to an analogy using 100+ year old technology.
Netflix is the one allowing multiple concurrent streams per logged in user.
If they switch to a hardline stance of geo-blocking/device blocking, etc. it will be at their own competitive peril. -
Netflix wants to crack down on users sharing passwords
tommikele said:22july2013 said:My opinion is that Netflix could make more money by lowering their monthly rate but prohibit account sharing (simultaneous streaming.) I would probably subscribe if they did that. If I had a family of twelve, I would probably like the account sharing surcharge, but I don't.
Just for testing, they could introduce an account type that was cheaper but blocked sharing. See how popular it would be.
Charge each user of a stream. If your account has four streams you pay four times $X then who cares who is using them. Fifth person tries to sign on, they can't. One price per stream.
This is, in fact, how Netflix charges - an amount of $$ per month gets you a certain number of simultaneous streams @ a certain quality level.
Why does Netflix need to make themselves the arbiter of family & existence locations as well?
I rent a car with 4 passenger seats.
The rental car company doesn't dictate to me who is allowed to sit in them. -
Netflix wants to crack down on users sharing passwords
ronn said:Netflix and others need to come up with a scheme similar to the legacy newspapers online access: create a limited number of free connections with a discount for new accounts and a reward for the account sharing the info.
I know there will be a lot of whining about this plan. But Netflix (and eventually others) have to do this. Too many are sharing with others outside of their households. Had a cousin that shared the account with her daughters when they went off to school. Who shared it with their friends and/or S/Os. My cousin wound up locked out of her own account. She had to call CS, reset the password and won't share her account with anyone now that the daughters have moved out.
Long live OTA & Freevo
I remember when the huge fights were against time shifting.
Now streaming platforms are trying to fight location shifting.
Family units are fluid & (see: US divorce rate over past 50-60 years) locationally complex.
If i am paying for a certain number of concurrent uses, eff off Netflix about trying to define my family structure & location. -
How the new Mac Studio fills a crucial gap in Apple's desktop lineup
CampBobcat said:Any thoughts on using a Mac Studio as a Server for small business?
Hardware would be perfect, MacOS Server is a hollowed out turd of a piece of software at this point.
We still have one of our 2012 Mac Pros running 10.13.6 just so we can keep Server v5.7.1 running for our 100 users.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208312
https://eshop.macsales.com/blog/43626-macos-server-will-lose-many-services-this-spring-here-are-alternatives/
It is sad, because it was (still is) the best GUI for a bunch of open source software solutions.
Many of these are still built into OS X/ can be added with MacPorts, but just not accessible via the Server app.
-
Compared: Mac Studio versus Mac Pro