sandor

About

Username
sandor
Joined
Visits
111
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,955
Badges
2
Posts
670
  • Netflix wants to crack down on users sharing passwords

    davidw said:
    sandor said:
    tommikele said:
    My opinion is that Netflix could make more money by lowering their monthly rate but prohibit account sharing (simultaneous streaming.) I would probably subscribe if they did that. If I had a family of twelve, I would probably like the account sharing surcharge, but I don't.

    Just for testing, they could introduce an account type that was cheaper but blocked sharing. See how popular it would be.
    ...

    Charge each user of a stream. If your account has four streams you pay four times $X then who cares who is using them. Fifth person tries to sign on, they can't. One price per stream.



    This is, in fact, how Netflix charges - an amount of $$ per month gets you a certain number of simultaneous streams @ a certain quality level.

    Why does Netflix need to make themselves the arbiter of family & existence locations as well?

    I rent a car with 4 passenger seats.
    The rental car company doesn't dictate to me who is allowed to sit in them.
    That' not right. When you rent 1 car, all your passengers have to go where you go. And in most cases, only you can drive the car, unless you pay extra for another driver. But there is still only 1 car. That's would be like having 1 stream and all your guest sitting on the sofa in front of the TV, have to watch what you watch and someone else can only watch what they want to watch, after you're done.

    But if you pay for 2 streams, someone on the sofa (like your son) that don't like want you're watching, can go watch something else in another room that have a TV. Or go to a friends home and watch something else on a mobile device or computer logged on to your account. What your son is not suppose to do, is log on to his friend's TV, with your account.   

    Paying for 2 streams would be like you renting 2 cars. But when you pay for 2 streams, it's not twice as much. When you rent 2 cars, it would most likely be close to double the cost of renting 1 car. That would be like paying for two 1 stream accounts.

    Yes, the rental car analogy is not 100%... 

    But, in the end, the passengers' use of the vehicle are not dictated by the rental company, rather the driver (ostensibly the one paying the fee) dictates the use .

    I could rent (or lease) one car & utilize it for transportation of all my neighbors & their families. 
    I can meet a portion of their transportation needs with my access to a vehicle. 


    If it traveled @ the speed of light, i could zip them around to college, vacation trips, a tent in the woods on the Appalachian trail, etc.
    So yes, there are limitations to an analogy using 100+ year old technology.


    Netflix is the one allowing multiple concurrent streams per logged in user. 
    If they switch to a hardline stance of geo-blocking/device blocking, etc. it will be at their own competitive peril.
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
  • Netflix wants to crack down on users sharing passwords

    tommikele said:
    My opinion is that Netflix could make more money by lowering their monthly rate but prohibit account sharing (simultaneous streaming.) I would probably subscribe if they did that. If I had a family of twelve, I would probably like the account sharing surcharge, but I don't.

    Just for testing, they could introduce an account type that was cheaper but blocked sharing. See how popular it would be.
    ...

    Charge each user of a stream. If your account has four streams you pay four times $X then who cares who is using them. Fifth person tries to sign on, they can't. One price per stream.



    This is, in fact, how Netflix charges - an amount of $$ per month gets you a certain number of simultaneous streams @ a certain quality level.

    Why does Netflix need to make themselves the arbiter of family & existence locations as well?

    I rent a car with 4 passenger seats.
    The rental car company doesn't dictate to me who is allowed to sit in them.
    watto_cobra
  • Netflix wants to crack down on users sharing passwords

    ronn said:
    Netflix and others need to come up with a scheme similar to the legacy newspapers online access: create a limited number of free connections with a discount for new accounts and a reward for the account sharing the info.

    I know there will be a lot of whining about this plan. But Netflix (and eventually others) have to do this. Too many are sharing with others outside of their households. Had a cousin that shared the account with her daughters when they went off to school. Who shared it with their friends and/or S/Os. My cousin wound up locked out of her own account. She had to call CS, reset the password and won't share her account with anyone now that the daughters have moved out.


    Long live OTA & Freevo


    I remember when the huge fights were against time shifting.
    Now streaming platforms are trying to fight location shifting. 

    Family units are fluid & (see: US divorce rate over past 50-60 years) locationally complex. 
    If i am paying for a certain number of concurrent uses, eff off Netflix about trying to define my family structure & location.
    watto_cobra
  • How the new Mac Studio fills a crucial gap in Apple's desktop lineup

    Any thoughts on using a Mac Studio as a Server for small business?

    Hardware would be perfect, MacOS Server is a hollowed out turd of a piece of software at this point.

    We still have one of our 2012 Mac Pros running 10.13.6 just so we can keep Server v5.7.1 running for our 100 users.
     https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208312
    https://eshop.macsales.com/blog/43626-macos-server-will-lose-many-services-this-spring-here-are-alternatives/

    It is sad, because it was (still is) the best GUI for a bunch of open source software solutions. 
    Many of these are still built into OS X/ can be added with MacPorts, but just not accessible via the Server app.

    watto_cobra
  • Compared: Mac Studio versus Mac Pro

    Hopefully the RAM capacity will grow with the M1

    Even our ancient 2012 Mac Pros have been running 128 GB for years (and our previous 2009's but we ditched them a while a go)
    The move to fianlly break the 128 GB limit with the 2019 Mac Pro was huge (for us & our workstations)


    watto_cobra