tht
About
- Username
- tht
- Joined
- Visits
- 166
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6,883
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 5,444
Reactions
-
iPadOS 17.5 beta teases OLED display upgrade for 2024 iPad Pro models
bohler said:I‘ve now used my ipad Pro 12,9‘‘ for 5 years…. the one thing I never had a problem with was the excellent screen and it is still excellent. The battery is dying so and I need a replacement. I really wonder who really cares about an OLED screen sidegrade. A larger screen iPad would be a really big thing ..everything else is a lame excuse to increase the price again to north of EUR 2000…..the decision to go for a macbook air M3 and abandon the ipad is drawing closer…I have an iPP10.5. It’s close to 7 years old now. Basically on its last legs. Battery doesn’t deliver a lot of power anymore and it is on its last OS version. I have been waiting for that iPP13 with OLED display, 16 GB, 2 TB with cellular machine. Will be my personal machine.The MBA is nice, but it is just not as mobile as an iPad. You can use the iPad in bed, waiting in line, in the car, at the desk, with a variety of accessories, so on and so forth.I watch video in bed in the dark. The OLED will provide the biggest benefit right there. Worth the money to me. -
Teenagers still overwhelmingly want iPhone and Apple Watch more than any other brand
gatorguy said:charlesn said:mpantone said:Teenagers are a notoriously fickle audience so this longterm and ongoing admiration for the Apple brand over years is actually very enviable. It's not like Apple didn't have competition before (like RIM BlackBerrys, T-Mobile Sidekicks, Windows Mobile) or now (Android).
In the end, it comes down to the overall user experience -- particularly software -- not some weird mobile device hardware specs circle jerk.
You can already see that the brand among teenagers is slowly dropping from the 2021 peak. So, the taste of the teenage market could already be changing away from Apple to whatever it will be. -
Jony Ive is now looking for funding to jump on the AI development train
Seems to be running at least 2 years late if they are only at the raising venture capital stage now. All they have had are brainstorming sessions?! And, OpenAI is not giving LoveFrom enough money to at least prototype something? That's weird. And LoveFrom wants $1b? That's a lot!
I'm pretty skeptical of consumer oriented generative LLM devices. If it is a voice only device, I think it fails. Voice interfaces are horrible. It's non-deterministic and low information density while taking high cognitive load. It is just not something a large fraction of the market will get into imo. It would be an interesting feature to see evolve on our existing devices, but even there, I wonder how popular it will be. It will have to be something very suitable for those types of models.
On the backend and for services, we will surely be tortured by chat bots. Travel agents, helper chat bots, etc. Yeah, it's already quite frustrating to try to talk to a human for this or that during a phone call, but now there is or will be an additional gate of the chat bot sounding human, designed to not help while making the wall ever higher to get some kind of customer service.
Don't understand why there is so much enthusiasm from the tech mediarati for this. They are bored, just like in the first round of voice interfaces when Amazon Echo/Alexa devices was the new "it" technology. Apple was so far behind there as I recall. The Internet of Things? Machine learning? VR? I'm not even sure why people think Apple needs to have "AI" when it primarily exists as a search service and eventually, primarily driven by ad sales, something that is not Apple. -
Apple appeals US trade ban on Apple Watches
Anilu_777 said:The big question is whether Masimo ever intended to make a wearable or was developing tech it could use for patent licensing purposes.The issue is that the USPTO awarded a patent to Masimo that was basically the sensor protrusion design in the Apple Watch. If you look at Masimo’s patent history for the two patents the ITC says Apple infringed upon, it looks pretty clear that these patents were written to submarine Apple’s Watch design.Prior to those patents, the protrusion in Masimo’s patents was of a cylindrical design more suitable for a finger clamp design. Those 2020 patents changed the sensor protrusion to a convex shape with a chamfer. That also was for a finger clamp design with no watch embodiment to be found in the patents.The USPTO and legal system are mandated to give the patent the widest interpretations possible and let the companies fight it out in court. So, it is the game that must be played.
Apple should never settle with Masimo. They also should never buy Masimo either. Best case is that Masimo’s leadership is fired. A buyout typically means employees are fired, and we shouldn’t want that. So, redesign the Watch oxygen sensor design at the worst, and keep Masimo in court. -
Future Apple devices may precisely track your gestures using radar
In Apple's patent, an array of radar units embedded in the case of a laptop or other device would provide pinpoint accuracy without needing any touch sensors. This system would provide more accuracy and open new ways of interacting with your devices.What’s defined as pinpoint? Can a user write with this system? How far away can this radar system detect stuff?
I do think Apple should add eye and hand tracking to all their devices, so this goes right along with that.One thing they need to figure out are false positives. If it tracks hands, fingers, styli while not touching the display, false positives is going to be something that needs to be dealt with.