loopless

I think it's amusing the reviewer implies "200 megabits per second" is somehow too slow to be useful? Someone seems to have forgotten that many ethernet networks were until recently maxing out at 100mbits/s, so 200mbits/s is pretty darn fast. Presumably Apple doesn't introduce new hardware like this just for the rare use case of needing to diagnose a watch, so one can assume this is going to be linked to some kind of health monitoring hardware..

What a waste of effort adding touch ID back in - I haven't missed it one little bit since I 'upgraded' to Face ID.

The concerns are completely valid and this has to be one of the most insane things Apple has ever proposed.

Apparently someone has decided that "child porn" is one of the most urgent issues facing society therefore extraordinary measures must be taken to identify anyone who possesses these images. What's next, imagine an image that makesfun of the president. If we get some fascist in power ( we were close), they could silently add the hash of that image to the database of hashes and suddenly they can instantly identify everyone with that image on their iPhone and send the secret police to their door?

Using the guise of child-porn as a trojan horse ( anyone who objects is tarred and feathered as being in favor of child-abuse) we are having our privacy invaded in the most evil way. 

HPC runs on Intel. Software vendors are slow to move in this field as it isn’t a simple recompile to run on Apple silicon. Apple would need to show a massive performance advantage…

I ,for one, can't wait to have my app for sale on the shelves of a Fry's superstore