ajmas

About

Username
ajmas
Joined
Visits
67
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
133
Badges
0
Posts
601

Reactions

93Like9Informative

  • Game engine maker Unity expects $30M hit from Apple's App Tracking Transparency

    ajmasajmas
    Gaby said:
    Personally I think Apple should purchase unity and retain the engineers. Then slowly integrate it into their SDK. It would help in myriad ways with the benefit of stifling Epics betrayal and scheming. Moreover if any of these court cases do result in Apple having to open up iOS somewhat and allowing 3rd party stores or payments then it would be another way to justify the commission model, and provides an additional incentive by offering a seamless high quality platform to retain devs and apps for the Appstore, rather than them having to pay Sweeney and Co. And additional percentage of revenues on top. All the while allowing for increased competition. Thus regulators would have no justification to complain. 
    Given that Unity uses C#, it would be more suited for Microsoft to purchase them, than Apple. 
    watto_cobra

  • Discord spokesperson blames Apple for NSFW content removal

    ajmasajmas
    Others have made the point that given that Discord is in many ways simply a transport of content, it should not be treated any differently from Safari. 

    This means Apple should either make Safari 18+ or accept that a generic platform should receive the same rating as Safari. 

    Individual Discord servers can already warn about content rating, which you need to click through before seeing. 
    Ofer

  • Tim Cook responds to Facebook's attack ads with tweet about privacy

    ajmasajmas
    I wonder how much the small business position is even valid. Brick and mortar stores don’t get access to this sort of information, so I suppose making it harder for online stores helps level the playing feel to an extent. 

    Note, that in certain cases loyalty cards do help physical stores work out customer buying patterns.  
    Beatswatto_cobra

  • Windows on Apple Silicon is up to Microsoft, says Craig Federighi

    ajmasajmas
    Microsoft already does the “Surface Pro X”, which is an ARM based device running Windows. It also runs on the Raspberry Pi, but that seems to be more of a Windows CE variant?

    At the same time making Windows work on M1 based computers likely won’t be enough, because people are generally using Windows to run stuff that is not available on macOS. If the application doesn’t work on Windows ARM, then that will be a deal breaker. This makes me wonder whether Apple would be willing to licence Rosetta 2 to Microsoft, for use with Windows?
    dysamoria

  • MacBook Air with M1 chip outperforms 16-inch MacBook Pro in benchmark testing

    ajmasajmas
    As soon as some real world tests are in, please publish them, even if it is just putting Rosetta 2 through its paces. Real world tests for me include FPS in a given 3D game, time for video processing or time to render a 3D scene in Blender, as examples. 

    I am not expecting anything amazing, just something that gives a real world impression, without being all defensive about either camps.
    watto_cobra