george kaplan

About

Username
george kaplan
Joined
Visits
53
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
560
Badges
1
Posts
169
  • 'Ted Lasso' cast in 'mourning' as filming for third season wraps up

    Fred257 said:
    Another stupid decision from Apple. First stupid decision only one Nand drive in newest M2 base model. Next stupid decision canceling Ted Lasso. I’m sure this is only the beginning of poor choices from Apple. Pretty unprecedented 
    Try it again, but read first. Sudekis and Lawrence have both said they planned only 3 seasons, and Sudekis especially doesn’t like being away from his kids for extended time. All indications is Apple would pay for 4th season if the creative team was giving a green light. 
    djames4242mwhitemichelb76pumpkin_kingmike1lkrupptdknoxFileMakerFellerlolliverwatto_cobra
  • Twitter sues Elon Musk for backing out of $44 billion merger

    JWSC said:
    melgross said:
    tshapi said:
    I think this is a money grab by twitter.  See, musk has claimed he doesn’t believe that twitter is being honest about the # of bots. And it appears that twitter is simply pointing to there public SEC filing as proof that there really is only 5% bots. 

    I also find it interesting that jack dorsey is quiet through all this. He’s allegedly musks ally in this, he created twitter and it’s my understanding that he was still an active part of the
    Company. 

    As I said uptop. This is a money grab. When Elon made the offer, the main reason it was accepted is because the investors got a financial offer that was hard for them to pass up.  

    I also think it’s possible that this is a war between Elon musk and the current CEO who doesn’t want to lose his job. 
    I can’t agree with that. Remember when Musk was going to take Tesla private? He Tweeted “funding complete!”. But he actually had no funding.

    from what I’ve been reading, and people I know who are as they say “close to the parties”, he never raised the $44 billion he claimed. His portion is only about 20-25% of that, and the other investors and potential investors had gotten a bit squirmy over the prospect at that high price the deal was going for. He seems to be working to, successfully so far, to lower the price of the company so far that he could change the specifics of the finances and possibly allow the purchase at a much lower price - one that would allow the deal with the funding he’s actually got.

    I can see that happening, with him saying that; “Well, at this price, it’s worth it.”

    remember that he’s just not trustworthy.
    Huh?  Why is Musk not trustworthy?  Is the Twitter board any more trustworthy than Musk?  Come on.
    https://insideevs.com/news/580787/elon-musk-tesla-private-tweet-false-judge-says/

    Stop me if you heard this one before: Musk states he’s going to buy a public company, then decides not to follow through, with claims he couldn’t get the financing. 

    The judge in the shareholder lawsuit ruled this past April that Musk lied when he tweeted he had the financing lined up. That is the very essence of “not trustworthy”.
    AI_liaswatto_cobra
  • Twitter sues Elon Musk for backing out of $44 billion merger

    This has nothing to do with bots. Its buyers remorse for a rich guy who suddenly realized that he doesn't want to tie up 20% of his wealth for an idea he only half baked.

    Compressed timeline: Eccentric billionaire wakes up, thought it was a brilliant idea. Consult yes men.  Eccentric billionaire wakes up, thought it was a bad idea, Consult yes men. 

    What ever his actual reasons are it's outrageous that this guy is trolling twitter and playing with peoples livelihood. I'm sure plenty of semi-normal employees have allot of their retirement in Twitters stock and here comes "I do what ever I want and the rules don't apply" Musk. 
    No more calls, we have a winner. 

    This saga may have begun as a way for Musk to put Twitter in play for some deep-pocketed suitor (Apple, Microsoft, etc) to buy it and Musk would reap handsome profits on the shares he had been buying without notifying Twitter. 

    When that didn’t happen, there was a passive-aggressive dance between Musk and Twitter Board, each saying the right thing in public while loathing the other party. Musk was invited to the Board, which he accepted then rejected. Then he placed the hostile offer, which the Board rejected then accepted, knowing nothing better would be found. 

    Now we are in the realm of open hostilities, but Musk painted himself in this corner by the way he structured his offer—remember, Twitter didn’t seek to be acquired—and didn’t leave an escape path on the deal. The Delaware Court of Chancery does not have many examples to suitors it left off the hook. Musk’s meddling and open disparaging of Twitter has greatly reduced share value—making his offer even worse as a buyer—and Musk’s own shares of Tesla, which were to secure the loans for purchase, also took a market hit. 

    He hates what he’s done, and nobody is to blame but Musk. 
    dewmewatto_cobra
  • Twitter sues Elon Musk for backing out of $44 billion merger

    Except he’s not buying a house so your analogy falls flat on its face.

    I would be shocked if Twitter hadn’t covered this exact contingency in the contract.

    Occam’s Razor says this is simply a sociopathic billionaire (but I repeat myself) trying to back out of a bad deal he made.


    1) Bot info is part of the SEC filing info Twitter long ago made public. This is a sham misdirection argument.

    2) To your homebuying analogy, if I offer to buy your home with no contingencies and waive due diligence, and during the closing black mold is discovered in the home, that is my problem, not yours. Musk waived the due diligence portion of the purchase offer. Was that bravado, hubris, or was he just high—you did notice his offer price was $54.20, right?—we may never know. But the odds of backing out of this deal are minuscule.

    Musk’s obfuscation and hostile posturing during this mess has ruined Twitter stock price. His offer was financially insupportable when it was made, and got even worse in the weeks which followed. The Board of Twitter can’t simply allow this to pass and the $1B “break-up fee” (which doesn’t apply unless his funding falls through, which isn’t what Musk is claiming) won’t repair the share damage Musk has caused.
    williamlondonlolliver
  • Apple renews workplace comedy 'Loot' for a second season

    The show fits the profile of “workplace comedy” but the writing is sharper and the acting better than I expected. Every episode thus far has been well-plotted and -written. 

    Glad there will be a Season 2. 
    lolliverFileMakerFeller