normm
About
- Username
- normm
- Joined
- Visits
- 64
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 599
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 653
Reactions
-
Leaker says 'AirTags' coming soon -- in two sizes
JinTech said:I am pretty sure with a product like this Apple will either have a replaceable battery or a trade-in value so Apple can recycle them once the internal battery dies. -
Photographer Austin Mann puts iPhone 12 Pro through its paces
iOS_Guy80 said:Looking at the Apple website and comparing the two pro models the max seems to only have a larger screen and a bump in optical zooming over the 12 pro. Any other differences?- WIDE (1×): Same on iPhone 12, 12 Mini, and 12 Pro, with a new ƒ/1.6 lens that captures 27 percent more light than last year’s 1× wide lens. The 12 Pro Max has the same ƒ/1.6 lens, but also has an altogether different sensor that is 47 percent larger than the 1× camera sensor on the other models. This bigger sensor has the same number of pixels (12 MP = 4032 × 3024), but those pixels are bigger. The larger sensor combined with the new-to-all-models ƒ/1.6 lens means the 1× wide camera on the 12 Pro Max captures 87 percent more light than last year’s iPhone 11 models. And that’s not all: in addition to being bigger, the new Pro Max’s 1× camera sensor exclusively features sensor-shift OIS, stabilizing the sensor rather than the lens, which according to Apple is beneficial both for photos and video. This sensor-shift OIS is also what enables the 12 Pro Max’s ability to capture up to 2-second exposures handheld, which, if it works as Apple describes, is a breakthrough that would be impractical in non-computational photography. Bottom line: all iPhone 12 models have the same 1× camera lens, which is faster than last year’s models, but the 12 Pro Max also has a bigger sensor and sensor-shift OIS.TELEPHOTO: This is the lens that the non-Pro models do not have. On the iPhone 12 Pro, it’s a 2× ƒ/2.0 lens with equivalent field of view to a 52mm lens. On the 12 Pro Max, it’s a 2.5× ƒ/2.2 lens equivalent to a 65mm lens. The sensors, apparently, are the same or effectively the same. 2.5× is “better” than 2.0× because it’s longer, offering more effective optical zoom. But ƒ/2.0 is “better” than ƒ/2.2, because it lets in more light. But whatever low-light advantage the 12 Pro’s ƒ/2.0 aperture might have over the 12 Pro Max’s ƒ/2.2 aperture, in practice this is almost certainly effectively moot, because in low-light situations the camera system probably gets better results using the faster 1× camera and digitally zooming to a 2×/2.5× crop factor.
-
Apple agrees to delay 30% cut of live event transactions on App Store
This approach is stupid. It winds up forcing services onto the Web that work better in-app. Like buying ebooks, or running games remotely. Apple used to say that they don't set out to make money, they set out to make the best products, and making money is a consequence. This is not making the best products.
-
Apple threatens to close Epic Games developer account on Aug. 28
dblanch369 said:Lol good. Don’t want their crappy games in the App Store anyway. I’m sorry, but those App Store rules are in place for a reason - to protect our way of life. If any of you have seen the mess that is the google play store, you will know what I mean...
I do think, though, that Apple is too stubborn in some ways. For example, letting big players sell digital content direct would improve the iOS user experience. -
Apple joins tech companies in trying to halt WeChat ban
magman1979 said:flydog said:wizard69 said:Apple needs to grasp the situation. China simply has turned into a grand example of a hostile country. They have far too many known programs to literally steal technology and of course the related spying programs. It is hilarious that nobody at Apple has recognized that the worlds relationship with China is not sustainable. Beyond that there is likely intelligence that Apple does't know about driving the Tik-Tok ban.
In a nut shell Apple needs to stop making excuses and get out of China ASAP.
But under your illogical reasoning, Apple should ignore the lack of any evidence, and simply stop doing business in China based on the rants of madman who will be out of office come January, or the generalized vague allegation that China "is a bad state."
Before you start typing furiously away at your keyboard, gather up your evidence (facts) that support WeChat is used to steal US technology, and one example of the "many known programs to literally steal technology and of course the related spying programs."