sevenfeet
About
- Username
- sevenfeet
- Joined
- Visits
- 100
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 556
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 472
Reactions
-
New MacBook Pro models limited to HDMI 2.0
sflocal said:HDMI 2.1 had a bandwidth speed of 48gb/s. Thunderbolt tops out at 40gb/s. The MBP most likely has four Thunderbolt/PCIe lanes and one of those lanes is used to share between the HDMI port and SD-Card port. So it makes perfect sense why it's limited to HDMI 2.0People whined and complained about getting back ports, and now that they do they still complain.I can see people primarily using that port to connect to projectors, and TV's on a TEMPORARY basis. Quite whining on a feature you may very likely never use on a laptop.
TB 5 is supposed to happen in 2022 and Apple has always been the earliest of early adopters. Perhaps we'll see it in the M2 hardware and the upcoming Apple Silicon Mac Pro. -
Intel CEO hopes to win back Apple with a 'better chip'
Apple is all about the control of what they do.....engineering, development and delivery. Right now the one thing Apple is fine with third parties is manufacturing. And that's the only path for Intel right now since Apple will never ever go back to buying an expensive general purpose CPU or GPU since they will never meet their specific needs. And right now, none of them have the power or especially the power per watt that Apple is doing. -
Apple unveils new iPad mini with updated design, 5G
-
iOS 14.8, iPadOS 14.8 tighten security, close off 'Blastdoor' attacks
-
Apple's Eddy Cue says Spatial Audio is a 'game-changer' for music
genovelle said:rcfa said:Most people never heard of lossless? Really?
Anyone who’s ever heard of these silver discs calls “CD”s has heard of lossless.
Only Napster, music piracy in conjunction with slow internet, metered cellular data and expensive flash memory brought us the “blessings” of lossy audio compression algorithms.
So, no, lossless isn’t “niche”, it was and should always be the normal case, lossy compression should be the exception.
As for what Eddy Cue said, yes Spatial Audio will probably make a bigger difference to most listeners than lossless. Most people get their music from their phones now and since lossless Bluetooth isn't a thing, Spatial Audio/Dolby Atmos makes more sense because it can be implemented with what most listeners already have.
That being said, I'm in the minority of users who does have the ability to easily show the difference between lossy AAC and lossless and especially HiRes audio. I have a dedicated 2 channel listening room, a smaller 5.1 home theater listening room and a larger 7.1.2 Dolby Atmos home theater. I spent some of today listening to the Atmos tracks in the Atmos theater and it sounded nice....not unlike the similar content on Tidal (which I also subscribe to mainly since I use the Roon player). I've been waiting for Apple to go lossless for a LONG time, and we got the added bonus of HiRes lossless which I wasn't expecting.
The problem for me now is that Roon has made it really easy to pipe my lossless and HiRes music to wherever I am in the house at the best possible quality. Apple Music and Airplay can't do that right now which makes using it for day to day listening a lot harder. Airplay can do straight 16 bit/44.1 CD quality lossless right now (it's been part of the standard since Airplay 1 was invented two decades ago). But I usually try to listen to HiRes audio these days if I can and that's going to be hard to feed my DACs which already connected to Roon.