elliots11

About

Username
elliots11
Joined
Visits
19
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
61
Badges
0
Posts
293
  • Mac Pro in danger after fumbled Apple Silicon launch

    The current Apple Silicon Mac Pro is the most phoned in product they’ve ever made.  A faction in Apple knows it too. I suspect there’s a group in Apple that was heavily involved in making the 2019 Mac Pro good, and there’s another faction that made the Mac Studio good (who previously failed with the Trash Can Mac Pro), that’s the group that wants to make the whole widget and not let anyone tinker around inside at all. That group probably pushed for soldered ram before Apple silicon made it necessary, soldered SSD’s and all that. And there’s legitimacy to both points of view, soldered is reliable. However I’m not buying a Mac Pro from the soldered RAM faction, and yet that’s what they made.  
    The 2019 Mac Pro also became pointless since there’s no GPU upgrade possibility because Apple was involved in making GPU’s work on their platform and that development will now stop.  
    Upgradability means good value for the customer.  For Apple that means lower profit and higher support costs.  It makes sense they don’t want to sell that many Mac Pros if they’re low volume and support costs are higher, and that’s probably factored into the price. But that also sucks, and I don’t want it.  
    I was ready to buy the new Mac Pro until it came out and was underwhelming. Now that budget is being put to other things.   
    I hope the next version is actually impressive. That they come out with upgrade cards as was rumored.  I hope they put the equivalent of an iPhone on a pci card and have that act as a 1st party replacement for egpus and GPU’s.  And there’s enough PCI lanes and all that.  I would wager the strikes in Hollywood are also hurting their sales.  I want the Mac Pro to live and be amazing.  So try again.  
    williamlondonAlex1Ndarkvaderwatto_cobra
  • Apple Silicon Mac Pro does not support PCI-E Radeon video cards

    mattinoz said:
    Interesting they didn't compress the slot layout but all the cards they show only need a single width slot. So lots of air flow for no real reason. 

    Still think GPU is on the way. 
    Part of the case design may be that they'd already designed the case and wanted to save money on developing another one, would be a huge waste of money designing that complex case for just one generation.  
    Re: GPUs, I'd love to see GPUs working on this, many would, and I bet we see something like it, but I'm not sure what form it will take.  It seems likely to be a software limitation that GPUs can't be used, and that could be overcome but it's not clear.  Right now the performance is solid on these Mac Pros, in a few years it won't be.  Obviously Apple would say buy a new one, but I wouldn't be surprised if Apple created some kind of roadmap for aftermarket PCI compute units, perhaps made of GPUS that only do compute, later on down the line after the benefits of integrated ARM chips sort of age out and a discrete GPU in combination with the Apple Silicon would yield better results.  Or maybe Apple rolls their own Afterburner2 made of newer SOCs, there is precedent in the Afterburner1.  Or it may be that if it is a software limitation that a workaround is found, then depending on the quality and resilience of the workaround to Apple breaking it is would determine discrete GPU support.  Would really like to know more on how they're stopping it as it doesn't seem there's any physical reason it shouldn't be possible, even if the performance is poor.  Guess we'll see.
    Alex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Mac Studio may never get updated, because new Mac Pro is coming

    thadec said:
    dennyc69 said:
    I don’t buy it, Hollywood types use Mac Pro, the  Mac Studio fills the gap for lower prices groups of people who still want pro power. This a click bait article? Don’t make stuff up 
    This is 15 year old stuff. "Hollywood types" switched to Linux ages ago. As dinosaurs are no longer roaming the earth, Mac Pro is most often used as a general purpose workstation that happens to run macOS. Such people have no use for a Mac Studio, which is engineered for audio, video and photo professionals and actually performs worse than similarly priced hardware for anything and everything else.
    Hollywood is not a monolith, there's a lot of people using basically everything.  I know a production company that ran on Macs with FCP7 up until it stopped making sense to do so, and then switched to Windows and Premiere, and now may switch back to Mac again at least partially, they're presently testing the waters.  Windows is used by many, Linux is used as well in certain places, most render farms are probably Linux, but not everyone is on a render farm.  One place I know uses a custom fork of Linux, but not many companies do that kind of thing.  
    A lot of Hollywood is freelancers, so a lot of editors on Adobe Premiere or Avid use Windows or Mac, a lot of people are switching to Resolve which pairs well with a Mac but also does runs on Windows and has a Linux version.  VFX artists are the same story.  Sound people same story.  What makes Macs appealing to Hollywood types is reliability, ease of use, and ProRes compatibility.  There's also a consistency to them.  Power / capability also matters a lot, I wasn't able to really do my job on a laptop before, but now I can thanks to M1 Max.  So Hollywood types not using Macs is simply not true, I use one every day and there's a lot of people like me.  And they also bought the 2017 iMac Pro in droves, so it's nothing new.

    Everyone in Hollywood who knows about computers is aware of and talking about Apple's chips and what they're up to, and a lot of us are buying them.

    citpeksradarthekatwilliamlondonFileMakerFellerh2p
  • Mac Studio may never get updated, because new Mac Pro is coming

    Seems like development of the Mac Pro has seen some issues. I would bet any delay in the M2 Studio has more to do with duration on the market of the first iteration and not wanting to outshine the new Mac Pro on release than anything else. I don’t have any inside info but I’ll bet the Studio sticks around. 

    Some of it could also be market research like “let’s see what sells then do more of that.”


    watto_cobraradarthekatFileMakerFellerAlex1N
  • AirTags catch United Airlines in lie about missing luggage

    Photographs, perhaps from Google Street View, show other United Airlines luggage strewn by the dumpster and apparently emptied.

    In her messages conversation, she repeatedly informs customer support that she has found the location of the luggage because of her AirTags. When support finally acknowledges this, they still repeat that she is wrong, the "bag is safe at the Delivery services distribution center."

    Szybala also reports that once she "pressed them to send me the details of their lost/stolen bag policy," the support rep stopped responding.

    Bureaucracies that behave like this are clear indicators of poor management.  Anything that helps hold accountable poorly led teams of people is fine by me. They’d have wasted hours of her time if not for the AirTags, and maybe that’s the point for them.  
    jas99CluntBaby92ronngregoriusm