maximara

About

Username
maximara
Joined
Visits
35
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
328
Badges
0
Posts
409
  • Apple getting sued over App Store user data collection

    JP234 said:
    As long as Apple isn't selling it to third parties (they aren't), I fail to see the harm Elliot Libman has incurred, nor what compensatory and punitive damages to which he's entitled.
    Sounds like that guy on 60 Minutes back in the 70s or 80s who practically lived on nuisance suits — just enough that fighting it wasn't worth the defendant's money to fight (ie they would spend more to fight than pay).
    watto_cobra
  • Apple freezes hiring outside of research and development

    fairlop said:
    Madbum said:
    dmskalnm said:
    Apple has tons of cash. This is what's it's for: to extend your lead when the market is in a downturn. Judicious is fine (does that mean that Apple wasn't judicious previously?) but tying a hand behind your back when you're making record revenue doesn't make sense.
    dmskalnm said:
    Apple has tons of cash. This is what's it's for: to extend your lead when the market is in a downturn. Judicious is fine (does that mean that Apple wasn't judicious previously?) but tying a hand behind your back when you're making record revenue doesn't make sense.
    Nah, stores might have been necessary 10 years ago, not anymore. Cash should be used for R and D and acquisitions and stock buy backs ,

    Close the non performing stores   immediately ,  can save a ton of cost there just closing 1/3 of them 

    Stores are likely to still be useful and necessary as service centres and for genius bar etc to support the ever increasing user base of products.


    Well if we get right to repair whose service centres and genius bars will largely be useless, won't they?   So many people wanted "to fix it ourselves" well perhaps making that your only option if the store doesn't perform sell in sales (Apple hardware repair is such a small percentage of their work it isn't even funny) will finally show those squeaky wheels 'be careful what you wish for; you may get it'.
    watto_cobra
  • USB4 Version 2.0 to offer up to 80 Gbps data transfer

    spheric said:
    The point of version numbers is that they're fucking NUMBER VERSIONS. 

    USB 3 —> USB 3.1 —> USB 3.2 Gen 1 —> USB 3.1 Gen 2 —> USB 3.2 Gen 2 —> USB4 Gen 2 —> USB4 Gen 3 —> USB4 Version 2.0. 

    Obviously. 

    Go fuck yourself, USB Consortium. 

    (Sorry, do I seem angry? Yeah.)

    I kind of see what the USB Consortium has doing but the naming still sucks.  Should have been

    USB 3 —> USB 3.1 —> USB 3.2.1 —> USB 3.1.2 —> USB 3.2.2 —> USB 4.2 —> USB 4.3 —> USB 4.2.0. Simple and far more logical (still have some issues but it is better than what we got).

    watto_cobra
  • Apple XProtect is now proactive with periodic malware scans

    Endpoint protection services and software is an essential business that Apple is giving away to Microsoft and others.

    it is a glaring gaping hole in the Apple service portfolio and security services is currently MS fastest growing segment and one of the reasons Azure was not ignored in favour of AWS.

    A personal Microsoft 365 subscription includes Defender for MacOS.

    Apple releasing obsolete scanning features is not impressive for a company that has trust and privacy as part of the value prop.

    honestly - add another 5 dollars per month to AppleOne and include XDR like agents across the device family with iCloud as the management console. Ties well into the SMB push they are doing and MDM offering.

    Users of Apple devices not being targeted or at lower risk is not true. 

    This is a multi Billion dollar business in the waiting for Apple.
    I think that approach would hurt Apple’s brand. It would suggest that without this $5 service, their operating system is not safe, and you need to pony up dollars to make it safe. 
    By offering it for free, they make it part of their value proposition and focus on productivity and content services, aka turning your computer or phone into a “vending machine of services and products”.

    Heck, if you wanted to be overly cynical you could say Microsoft either purposely "crippled" their OS security just so they could sale this service or the programmers they have are so poorly skilled they can't figure out how to have such a security feature built into the OS.
    georgie01watto_cobra
  • Congress running out of time on its Big Tech antitrust bill

    DAalseth said:
    You know, I get the feeling that “Big Tech” is where the “Big Three” automakers were in 1962. Fat, abusive, turning out a decent if not great product, complacent. I just get a feeling that some little company will come out of nowhere and introduce a new way of doing things. Maybe a new phone OS, maybe a new online hang out, maybe a new way of putting customers and businesses together. I don’t know. If I did I’d be jumping all over it. But I get the feeling that for all the people who love Amazon, and gush over Android, or yes pine for the next Apple thing, there’s an undercurrent of discontent. Somebody is going to come in, be the next little upstart company that is “for the rest of us”. Someone will come in and drop the 21st century equivalent of the Toyota Corolla, or Honda Civic, or Apple II. When they do “big tech” will be caught completely flatfooted. They’ll disregard the little guy until one day they find that a lot of their customers, died in the wool Windows and Mac fans, hard core Android and iOS users have jumped ship for something better. 

    It’ll be the best thing that could happen to them.

    A changing marketplace is Operation Normal.  Intel was king of the PC world until they got complacent and proceeded to do a series of boneheaded moves that allowed AMD to make headway and then thanks to Intel producing an insanely buggy CPU Apple said 'screw it, we'll design our own based on that ARM CPU we have had in our iPhones and iPads'.  Now everybody and his brother either are on the ARM bandwagon or have announced they are getting on...even Intel (though Intel is still trying to hold on to the increasingly clunky x86 with a weird x86/ARM hybrid)

    I firmly believe if Sears had been run more intelligently they could have been Amazon.  Heck, Sears last general catalogue was in 1993; in 1994 Amazon (then Cadabra Inc) opened its doors.


    JaiOh81DAalsethdewmejony0beowulfschmidtwatto_cobra