djsherly

About

Username
djsherly
Joined
Visits
89
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
406
Badges
1
Posts
1,031
  • Review: Alpine's iLX-107 is the first, and best, aftermarket wireless CarPlay receiver

    Yes, kind expensive but also a bit bummed that it doesn't have a rotary volume control. 
    spliff monkeyStrangeDaysratsgpatrick6877
  • Review: Kwikset Premis HomeKit lock chews through batteries, disappoints

    Review talks about alarming rate of battery usage but does not quantify. Given that's a primary beef with the product it seems it would be pertinent to provide such info. 
    toolreviewzonepscooter63
  • Apple Music rival Spotify tops 140 million free & paid subscribers

    Rayz2016 said:

    joebags said:

    Spotify is simply a better product.

    Apple won't introduce a simple, streaming-only app (like Spotify) and instead continues to confuse users with an iTunes app that's a cluster-f of purchase and streaming.

    Yes, this nonsense comes up pretty regularly still; often parroted by people who haven't taken a minute to think it through. So for the pseudo-geeks out there, let's run through the logic once again: why doesn't Apple provide app for Apple Music?
    An Apple customer is not interested in the source of the music; they are interested in the music. An Apple customer thinks, "I'd like to hear Sympathy for the Devil", so he then starts the music app and plays "Sympathy for the Devil" unconcerned as to whether it was a track he downloaded, ripped from a CD or streamed from Apple Music.
    Under the pseudo-geek scheme, the Apple customer has to think "Now where will I find the song?" Before he can play "Sympathy for the Devil" he has to remember where to find it. "Now, do I stream that one, or did is it part of my library?"

    So what you want is for Apple to introduce a scheme whereby their customers have to remember which application to use before they can play their music.

    Jesus man, it's not that hard. You subscribe to a music streaming service. You just tap the icon for same. It's not like you forgot that you bought the damn thing. How the hell did we get anything done before the iPhone? It was the mush between our ears. And believe it or not, it hasn't dissolved in the last ten years.
    GeorgeBMac
  • Apple Music rival Spotify tops 140 million free & paid subscribers

    I also still question the revenue they get from those "premium" subscriptions. I constantly see promotions where you get 6 months or 1 year of free Spotify Premium if you buy "insert product here".
    I'm getting Apple Music for two years as part of my cell plan. It's no more expensive than my last contract so someone's eating the cost somewhere. 

    Ive also still got Spotify for the reason noted above. It's just easier to use. 

     But I don't know how much vc money can continue to be tipped into this thing until the losses are enough. Profit from streaming seems pretty hard to do. 
    john.bwatto_cobra
  • A very false narrative: Samsung Galaxy S8 vs Apple's iPhone

    minglok50 said:
    saltyzip said:
    ronn said:
    saltyzip said:

    The problem for the iPhone is not Samsung, like appleinsider seems to think, it is Android in general.

    That's been said so many times over the years and it still isn't true. Nokia. Motorola. Huawei. LG. Samsung. Google's Nexus line, and now its Pixel line. They were all supposed to take out Apple either alone or as a group. Apple is not only still around, but thriving, and looks extremely healthy for the foreseeable future.




    IMHO buying a phone has now just come down to personal preference, there isn't much difference between any of them these days, they all do the job asked of them pretty admirably. Like cars, I pick the one I like in my price range, they all get me from a to b and back again at the end of the day. The market has matured so fast I can't justify spending 1000s on a top tiered phone anymore. If more people start thinking like me, it will hurt Apple as they will no longer be able to justify their high prices, but it will be good for consumers. Apple aren't a tag heuer brand, where you have to pay through the nose for exclusivity.
    Sorry Saltyzip, but you are an Android apologist on an Apple based site. Samsung S8 phones are relatively the same price as the iPhone so do not use price point as an excuse for your bias.
    I missed the bit where saltyzip made any reference at all to a Samsung s8. There are plenty phones half the price that will perform well (eg oppo r8). All it needs to do is browse the web, grab email, have a halfway decent camera, and quality social media apps and thats 80% of the market. Even the iPhone 5s does all of that with aplomb. 
    avon b7