djsherly

About

Username
djsherly
Joined
Visits
89
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
406
Badges
1
Posts
1,031
  • Review: Apple's new wireless AirPods put a smile on 2016

    djsherly said:

    djsherly said:
    Dang, somebody got paid for writing an article...
    With your logic, I guess no one can write a positive article about a product they really liked. 
    I'm sure they're amazing headphones, but effusive isn't the word I'd use for this article. Fawning might be a better one. 
    Why? Because he really liked the product? The product that has people lining up outside of stores for? If he found it to be as good as hope, why on earth wouldn't be enthusiastic in his article? Should he throw in some made-up negatives in an attempt to be perceived as "fair & balanced"? I think that would be disingenuous..
    Allow me to go back... 

    "I'm sure they're amazing headphones"

    It's a comment on his writing style, his assessment that these headphones cancelled out all the bad of 2016 (I don't think he meant solely from an Apple perspective, btw) was particularly ridiculous. It's one of those things I'm sure he'll read in a few years and cringe. 

    Btw he messed up a statement. I'm pretty sure it's the "intersection of technology and the liberal arts", not the "corner".

    at 0:50


    That's your criticism? Corner vs intersection? Try harder man. 
    My criticism was that the article was fawning. I was pointing out that a favourite quote was incorrectly referenced as a side note. It was a btw. Did you miss that?

    maybe it's not me who should be trying harder. 
    avon b7mac_128
  • Review: Apple's new wireless AirPods put a smile on 2016

    Dang, somebody got paid for writing an article...
    With your logic, I guess no one can write a positive article about a product they really liked. 
    I'm sure they're amazing headphones, but effusive isn't the word I'd use for this article. Fawning might be a better one. 
    baconstangavon b7mj web
  • Apple gives retail employees T-shirt, keepsake credo for holidays

    Or how about, "Thank you for the TShirt and the Apple Credo". Also, "thank you for reminding me that I work for a wonderful company, with good ethics and that cares about all its employees. Thanks for all the other perks I get throughout the year. And, Apple I understand that you can't get extravagant with the gifts, considering you have tens of thousands of employees and a fiduciary responsibility to the investor/owners.
    And, especially, thanks for the job!".

    that would be my approach.
    If you're going to give give gifts for Christmas, give gifts that have meaning. This is really insincere.

    I got a gift voucher which got me a really nice pair of shoes, a highly rated bottle of red wine and and a degustation at a highly regarded restaurant. Give gifts by all means, but a t shirt and a christmas card?
    sirlance99rogifan_newboredumbbigpicsperkedeldysamoriaduervorobertwalterGeorgeBMacicoco3
  • Microsoft Surface Dial evokes comparison to Griffin PowerMate for Mac

    maestro64 said:

    The important thing to remember MS has long history of promising great things and failing to deliver on them. I willing to put this product concept in the same bucket.

    This is why I always liked Apple, they never showed up what was not already possible, they delivered exactly what they demo. MS and other show these great ideas and we wait years only to find out they could not make it work as they claim they would.

    And yet this article has nothing to do with an apple product. 

    In fact, I'm not even sure why the article exists.

     "Hey everybody, here's something from years ago which does half of this other thing". Shocker. 
    aylklightknightnetmage
  • EU-imposed Apple Irish tax bill could exceed $21.2B if appeal process fails

    spacekid said:
    The thing you guys don't realise is that all the US corporations set up in Ireland because it's a way for them to avoid paying their due taxes in other European countries. It's not just Apple, it's Google, Facebook, Starbucks etc. It's absolutely disgraceful the amount of tax they get away with. You should do some research into it before saying it's a money grab from other EU states. Stackbucks for example paid just £8.6m over 14 years to the UK with £3billion in sales during that period. They're able to do this because of dodgy tax systems that Ireland has set up. It's not right and none of us should be supporting Apple or any other company that does this. Americans might be allergic to tax, hence the reason your public services are non-existent, but even you should be able to recognise this is messed up.
    A more sensible response would have been to require Ireland (and all EU countries) to collect some minimum tax from this point forward. I'm not aware that Ireland's tax rate was a secret. Making retroactive changes for legal laws the EU doesn't like doesn't seem like the best thing to do.
    Is it really retroactive? If the agreement/ruling which set up apple/Google/Starbucks in Ireland was illegal there was never a valid agreement in the first place (void ab initio) so the state is being asked to recover whatever should have been paid from the outset. 

    These ridiculous and Byzantine tax structures are clear for what they are and deprive states of revenue for giving companies access to customers. Maybe a 30% cut on the transaction value might actually make sense, reducible for ongoing subscriptions. 

    These companies are taking the piss and they know it. They hide behind black letter law in claiming compliance which they know isn't untruthful but it's certainly deceptive. 
    gatorguy