seankill
About
- Username
- seankill
- Joined
- Visits
- 128
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 657
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 569
Reactions
-
Apple to launch entry level 13.3-inch MacBook with Retina display in Q2, report says
-
Watch: Cheaper HomePod rumored to debut this year
chasm said:I’m not saying this report is false ... I have no insight on that ... but (very oddly) missing from this report is that the “Economic Daily News” mentioned as the source is the Taiwan Economic Daily News, a notororiously inaccurate rumour-monger of some ill repute from this very site’s own (named) writers.
There’s also the fact that Apple very, very rarely produces a cheaper and roughly-equal version of a product so quickly after introducing the first version, but that leaves the possibility that Apple might produce a “crappier” version of the HomePod ... oh wait, no it doesn’t, because Apple doesn’t do that.
What is fair to say is that Apple seems to be expanding its audio offering of late, and so some further speakers that may have a lower price point are a possibility. I personally doubt we’ll get a “HomePod Junior,” and I also think the writer neglected to mention that the HomePod’s Siri, while not up to the versatility of the iOS version, is a) focused on what people actually do with smart speakers, and b) capable of being upgraded as Apple figures out what else users want.
I’ll tell you what users don’t want ... a hackable, always-recording smart speaker that literally mocks them for buying it!
Article should've said Siri is trash. Problem with a HomePod mini is then it would suck in sound too. Hopefully Apple has some huge updates for Siri coming. -
FCA and Volkswagen offer six-month Apple Music trials to new car buyers
-
iPhone owners aren't upgrading to iPhone X due to price, lack of exciting features, survey...
georgie01 said:djames4242 said:If carriers still subsidized I might upgrade every two years, but now that we're stuck with the full cost of the phone, it's just too difficult to justify the expense.
I had to pay $280 upfront for my iPhone X and $30/mo. which is the same monthly fee for my previous iPhone 7 (upfront cost was $100). $50/mo for unlimited LTE service and it’s hard to say the X costs too much money.
On the flip side, I still have my iPhone 7+. Once 24 months gets here, I’ll save the 30$ per month plus the 280$ upfront cost you just paid. So after 2 more years, you paid probably over $1,000 more than I did or the users that hold on to the devices longer. Not saying that’s an issue, it’s your money, but for most of us, it’s wasted money. -
Video demonstrates iPhone 6s performance before and after battery replacement
georgie01 said:If that video is respresentative of the experience for every phone, I think it’s safe to say the majority of users wouldn’t really notice their phone was slower without a basis of comparison. Probably a tiny minority either noticed or accidentally discovered it and then made a fuss and then everyone decided they hated the ‘problem’ they hadn’t noticed.
I don’t think Apple had any obligation to inform users. Apple decided a more stable phone was more important than a faster phone, and so they altered their own software which they’ve developed for many years to reflect their goal. They make many decisions without consulting users first which affect the user experience.
It’s not the act of stabilizing the phone that is getting Apple ripped, it’s the fact they did not inform their user base and even their employees had a shit poor understanding of the issue.