lorca2770
About
- Username
- lorca2770
- Joined
- Visits
- 33
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 173
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 72
Reactions
-
Big Tech firms pledge to control AI, but Apple is not joining them
-
Apple expands test driver team for its 'Apple Car' autonomous vehicle project
Come guys, it is the process of research and new development to be applied to either “a car” or to other projects. Thinks of NASA that, without its research no matter how primitive results today, it conducted us to the explosion of new advances and technology, from micro-motors to AI’s solutions.
It is the Apple’s car…? I do not think so, and Apple knows it. It is, perhaps without knowing it, what is conducting us to the new glasses and future developments. -
Apple Watch sets new US record, now owned by 30% of iPhone users
-
Zuckerberg thinks Apple is making aggressive moves now to control the metaverse
williamh said:PeaceLoveAndKindness said:One more thing!. ZBerg built a platform that put Trump in office, a platform that has created social anarchy, a platform that let a hostile nation (Russia) to control US politics, a platform that has literally killed hundreds of thousands of people with misinformation (COVID), a platform that has defaced democracy. Sleep well on your billion threadcount sheets while millions suffer.Jayyzzzuuzzzzz, what absurd and disingenuous you are. Please pray to save the dichotomy of my thoughts.
-
Apple's chips targeted in a new patent infringement suit
22july2013 said:There is nothing illegal with any company that "exhibits patent-troll like behaviour." Designating them with the demeaning word "trolls" shows bias. In a free market there are many speculative ways to make money, and obtaining patents and testing them in court is a legal and valid way to make money. Apple itself probably buys patents by buying companies that own patents, which is also a form of speculating in the patent trade. It's actually smart behaviour. I've never seen AppleInsider criticize Apple for buying companies with patents, for the patents. What's the difference? Why the double standard?
When Apple bought 17,000 patents from Intel two years ago, AppleInsider didn't call Apple a "troll" but rather suggested it was smart of Apple to purchase them.
https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/07/25/apple-buys-intel-4g-and-5g-modem-patent-portfolio-for-1-billion <--