blastdoor
About
- Username
- blastdoor
- Joined
- Visits
- 338
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6,914
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 3,879
Reactions
-
The Mac mini doesn't sell in huge volumes, but is a crucial part of Apple's ecosystem
nubus said:The desktop line could be mini and Studio. And perhaps just Studio unless the price and size of mini goes down.- Pro isn't really Pro these days with everything glued. Drop it and go Studio.
- iMac 23.5" is an expensive mini with a small display, bad ergonomics, a terrible mouse, and only the base processor. Do we need it?
- The old iMac Pro was a bad fix for not upgrading Mac Pro for 5 years and for making it far too expensive. Studio or mini + display is the fix for those big iMacs.
-
The Mac mini doesn't sell in huge volumes, but is a crucial part of Apple's ecosystem
charlesn said:Just a reminder that the Consumer Intelligence Research Partners "data" that Apple Insider is so fond of reposting as if it were fact has, in fact, no factually-supported, direct correlation to whatever the real numbers might be. I'm not saying the numbers they report couldn't be valid, only that there is no way to verify that they are, while CIRP cloaks its methodology in exclusive sourcing and algorithms that it doesn't reveal. Also a reminder that getting their name into articles like this is how they market themselves for their actual business, which is convincing clients that that they're experts with "secret" information worth paying for. The more times your name gets quoted in the press, the greater the illusion of expertise and the more expert you become. -
The Mac mini doesn't sell in huge volumes, but is a crucial part of Apple's ecosystem
headfull0wine said:I’m waiting for the new Mini to come out to replace my 27” intel iMac. I don’t want to drop $3k+ on a Mini and Studio Display, but I want retina scaling and I REALLY don’t want a 24” screen. So what’s a guy to do?The absence of the 27” iMac is likely driving more Mac Mini sales. I also suspect most will go outside the Apple ecosystem for a monitor rather than shell out for the Studio Display. Lost opportunity for Apple.I tried a cheaper display but I couldn’t stand the downgrade from the display in my iMac. So I sprung for the Studio Display. It seems like it should be less expensive, yet obviously I was willing to pay. -
The Mac mini doesn't sell in huge volumes, but is a crucial part of Apple's ecosystem
DAalseth said:
Elderly, why you whippersnapper, I ain’t elderly. Seasoned maybe, I’d give you well worn, but I ‘taint elderly dadgummit.Mac Mini appeals predominantly to two distinct age groups -- the young and the elderly
OK that’s more like it. All kidding aside I got an M2Pro MM last year to replace my very aged iMac. It was cost effective and drives my dual 4K monitors very comfortably. I use it mostly for work to remote into our office systems. On the side I’ve been doing art and making audio recordings. It was less expensive than a similarly equipped iMac, and I don’t have the annoyance of mismatched monitors. It’s a damn powerful system that will serve me for a long time.The Mac mini has found a market among developers, media producers, and small business owners needing a reliable, customizable, compact desktop solution
I anticipate my next Mac purchase might be an M4 Ultra Mac Studio if/when such a thing becomes available. -
M4 MacBook Pro update looms as supply chain continues to ramp up