blastdoor
About
- Username
- blastdoor
- Joined
- Visits
- 336
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 6,912
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 3,877
Reactions
-
Apple chipmaker TSMC struggles to please both U.S. and Chinese officials
-
Save $300 on the Apple Studio Display during Black Friday sale
-
M4 Mac mini review roundup: Pint-sized powerhouse that won't break the bank
-
Apple CEO Tim Cook congratulates Trump on his second election win
-
First M4 Max benchmark tears apart the M2 Ultra Mac Studio
Spencer314 said:lordjohnwhorfin said:How does this compare to what’s available in the PC world, whether Intel/AMD or the more comparable ARM based Snapdragon?
https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks
I'm sure NVIDIA GPUs are still faster, but it's a bit more difficult comparing them since they don't really run the same benchmarks. It's also pretty hard to compare AI engines for the same reason.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/compare/8593852?baseline=8608283
the only sub-test where the 9950x wins is ray-tracing, because the 9950x has 32 logical (16 physical) cores, and ray tracing scales incredibly well with more threads. But ray tracing is an outlier in that regard. Otherwise, the m4 max wins big.
note that for multithreaded workloads that scale well, AMD’s threadripper and Epyc products are far ahead of Apple because they have a ton of cores. But they are also incredibly expensive and use a lot of power. For example:
https://system76.com/desktops/thelio-mega-r3-n2/configure
you can easily configure a system that costs over $20k with a 96 core cpu.