nhughes
About
- Username
- nhughes
- Joined
- Visits
- 117
- Last Active
- Roles
- editor
- Points
- 1,914
- Badges
- 3
- Posts
- 770
Reactions
-
First look: Apple's HomePod is loud, heavy and powerful
dewme said:Does the HomePod consume one of the ten (10) device licenses authorized to access iTunes Match? -
iPhone X doomsayers lack basic reading comprehension skills (or they're purposefully disho...
-
HomePod preorders begin via Apple, smart speaker arrives Feb. 9
rogifan_new said:nhughes said:StrangeDays said:nhughes said:AppleZulu said:nhughes said:gatorguy said:nhughes said:rogifan_new said:gatorguy said:mjtomlin said:rogifan_new said:Where are the reviews?
They'll start coming out today. Here's two...
Digital Trends - Apple's HomePod delivers on brilliant sound, but Siri still has room to grow
Refinery29 - One Hour With Apple's New HomePod
Also worth noting that the iPhone 8 officially launched on Sept. 22, just 7 days after preorders began. And the reviews arrived three days before launch. With HomePod, there is a two-week window. So we may not see review embargoes lift until Feb. 6-7-ish.
(I haven't been asked to sign an embargo, so I'm not withholding any inside info, just speculating.)
So by tightly controlling access to the device until well after pre-sales begin, Apple can limit the potential damage of an attention seeker or of intentional sabotage. With that delay, even if someone puts out that misleading review and it gets some buzz, Apple follows it with a report of robust pre-order sales, and next, all those pre-orders start arriving and the customers themselves generate buzz about how much they like the thing. Mind you, this strategy wouldn't help if Apple were to actually produce a real turnip, but if the product is a good one, this way limits their exposure to negative opportunism, and primes the pump for positive buzz.
In the end, the Wi-Fi bug was a minor blip on the radar. Still shouldn't have happened, though.
I was making the argument that Apple should provide review units to the media more than a week before product launch, whenever possible, because it could help them squash bugs by the time it launches to the public. But then again, I work for the media, and would like to have more time to fairly test a product before reviewing it, so my perspective is skewed.
As for your suggestion that something changed in a significant way with the iPhone X launch? The handset became available Nov. 3. Our review was published Nov. 1.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/17/11/02/iphone-x-review-apples-face-id-vision-for-the-future-of-ios
Case in point: When the DJI Spark launched last year, a bunch of reviews -- published before the product launched -- criticized it for lacking hand gesture tracking by default (i.e., throw it in the air and use gestures to control without using your phone to change modes). The reviews were instantly outdated when the Spark shipped -- it had a day one patch to add that feature. A bunch of tech journalists complaining about something that no consumer would encounter. Whoops.Of course, it raises the question of when to publish. For example, we didn't publish our iPhone X review when the embargo lifted, because our reviewer felt like he hadn't had enough time with the device. Other publications did run reviews. I don't want to speculate as to why, but I can tell you that there is immense pressure in the publishing world to be first, as you can imagine.
And it's not like you can responsibly hang onto a product for a great deal of time before reviewing it. watchOS has dramatically improved since the Apple Watch first launched, and the first-generation hardware is now a vastly different product because of those changes. But obviously no one was going to wait for a then-mythical watchOS 2 to review the first Apple Watch.
If I were king, I'd say give a reviewer at least two weeks with the product, and embargo the reviews until the day the product launches, or at least the day before. Make sure the reviewers have the exact same device, software and experience that a buyer will have on day one. The embargo timing is basically what Apple does (2-3 days before, and I can't recall a day-one patch anytime recently), but how early they provide the product does vary. I think the iPhone X was under a tight production timeline and that was the chief reason it was a shorter window for a lot of publications (AI included). -
HomePod preorders begin via Apple, smart speaker arrives Feb. 9
rogifan_new said:gatorguy said:mjtomlin said:rogifan_new said:Where are the reviews?
They'll start coming out today. Here's two...
Digital Trends - Apple's HomePod delivers on brilliant sound, but Siri still has room to grow
Refinery29 - One Hour With Apple's New HomePod -
HomePod preorders begin via Apple, smart speaker arrives Feb. 9
rogifan_new said:Where are the reviews?