brucemc

About

Username
brucemc
Joined
Visits
89
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
2,049
Badges
1
Posts
1,541
  • 'iPhone 5G' in late 2020 will drive 200 million sales for Apple, says Ming-Chi Kuo

    That is quite the prediction of Ming.  That an iPhone would be released in 2nd half of a year (who would have thunk it), and that Apple might sell about 200M iPhones in a year (which is a bit below the average of the last number of years).  Ah, to be an exalted analyst...
    watto_cobra
  • Editorial: Could Apple's lock on premium luxury be eclipsed by an era of good-enough gear?...

    bb-15 said:
    Imagine a company looking through your mail, tracking where you go & what you buy to send advertising to you. In the past that would have been intolerable.   
    But that is what Google does. It mines data on its apps, ties it to the user and uses that data to send individualized ads to the customer. 
    This is how Google makes most of its money. 

    https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/020515/business-google.asp ;

    https://bgr.com/2016/02/11/why-facebook-and-google-mine-your-data-and-why-theres-nothing-you-can-do-to-stop-it/ ;

    I minimize that kind of data tracking as much as possible & part of how I do that is to carefully use Apple products to reduce data tracking for ads.
    In addition, Apple has top notch customer service & devices which have OS support/updates for many years.  
    The Apple ecosystem works well across its devices. 
    Apple products by & large are simple to use & yet are very powerful. 

    For all those things which benefit me, I’m willing to pay a reasonable amount more. 

     
    You don’t think Apple would do the same? Tim Cook talking about privacy isn’t a guarantee. He may one day make the “pragmatic” decision to sell your data.
    Company A is a privacy nightmare, tracking your activity, storing it forever, buying additional 3rd party data to match against its own.
    Company B does none of these things, keeps much of its data only for 6 months, invests in methods to anonymize data, and actively promotes privacy and security.

    But, maybe in the future Company B will change their mind.  Therefore Company B really is no better than Company A...
    crowleymattinozmuthuk_vanalingamtmaywatto_cobra
  • Editorial: Could Apple's lock on premium luxury be eclipsed by an era of good-enough gear?...

    Rembert said:
    interesting article. Apple seems to be loosing ground by their appearant stubborn focus on exclusive and fashionable high-tech which does actually function close to perfectly. Just like in Steve Jobs' time, Apple doesn't listen to their customers. With Jobs this seems to have been a good idea as he had a pretty good vision on what people needed even before those people realized they needed this. With Cook it's different. There's no real innovation, it's mostly evolution. People want stuff in the Apple family which is good enough to run within the Apple family. Yes, a market exists for those sensitive to exclusive and fashionable gear. But that market will definately fail if Apple fails to answer to the demands of people who require gear which is good enough. For me, this involves an iPhone-SE-sized phone or even the continuation of the current SE as it's good enough already. And a MBP which is a continuation of the 2015-model as that one is good enough already. Everything beyond the SE and the 2015 MBP is indeed exclusive and fashionable but it's way beyond what a lot of people need (I deliberately refrain from making remarks regarding the newer MBPs regarding touchbar and keyboard). I feel Apple is currently using use-cases which do not sync with reality. If Apple doesn't review these use-cases, I fear Apple will loose ground very quickly, just like in the 90s. I'm already checking-out Android phones and Linux laptops, wondering when I will jump ship.
    I always get a good laugh at posts like this one.  It starts off with the "Apple is not innovative enough" argument - that all they do is refine products instead of build the future.  And then they bring up what they want - a refined older Mac that has all of the ports of the last 10 years, and an updated SE.  Somehow this is innovation.

    The key question - are these people stupid - or simply are so obsessed with their dislike of Apple and their own desires that they are completely clueless as to the double think spelled out within the same post?
    watto_cobra
  • Apple Watch's heart rate monitoring credited with saving another life

    Sure, this is nice and all.  But what about all the other times Apple is NOT saving lives?  Are we going to let them get away with it?  Apple isn't doing enough, and they should be held responsible.  Also, Apple is simultaneously doing too much, and they should be held accountable for that too.
    watto_cobra
  • Survey claims 86 percent of US teens plan to choose iPhone as next smartphone


    gatorguy said:
    MacPro said:
    Great news and agree with the poster above. No doubt our resident Google journalist will post refuting evidence any second ...
    This is exactly the type of thing I said to you a couple days back: Trolling me with an invitation to a thread that if I had an interest in I would comment on it. I don't. It doesn't matter to me what someone wants to use for a phone, but that wasn't the reason for your call-out anyway IMO.
    https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/comment/3146438/#Comment_3146438

    You seemingly have a greater interest in trolling me than discussion. No prob. I learned the drill years ago, I just have a new follower with an agenda. 
    How did he invite you to this thread...?
    watto_cobra