nht
About
- Username
- nht
- Joined
- Visits
- 115
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 2,007
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 4,522
Reactions
-
If you think Tim Cook is 'robbing' you, then so was Steve Jobs
madan said:nht said:lorin schultz said:radarthekat said:lorin schultz said:To pick a nit:
Consistent gross margins don't tell me anything about changes to the affordability of products. One doesn't need to be a financial analyst to figure out that the price of a 15" MacBook Pro is substantially higher, even after inflation, than it was five years ago. If the reason for that isn't growing margins, then obviously costs have also increased. Maybe Apple has a problem with cost control and/or spending decisions?
It may well be that this is just how much it costs to make fancy-pants computers now. I'm neither qualified nor adequately informed to offer an opinion about what Apple should or could do. All I'm saying is the current approach is moving the income level required to be an Apple user even higher. Our middle-class household can no longer afford the products we used to buy on a three-year cycle. Maybe I need to just accept that and walk away. I hope not, though.
Thus margins indicate that costs have increased and not profits.
Also, the needs of most middle-class households can now be met by iPads or lower tier Macs rather than 6 core i7 15" MBP. The downside to the product line is that the direct replacement for a MBP from 3 years ago has a smaller screen but likely also costs less.
Apple still provides the iPhone 7 at $449 when talking about iPhones. The iPhone 8 is $599. The three year old iPhone 6s was $649 at launch. The 8 is a solid upgrade at $50 less than your $649 replacement budget. The Xr costs $749 but is 6.1"...so it's a worthwhile stretch if you want to go that route and the same price as the 6S Plus. So if your phone was a 6S Plus in 2015 the Xr is a direct replacement at the same price.
There's just this extra tier above the tier that you purchased in 2015 and there isn't a smaller option anymore.
That you don't like the upgrade path doesn't mean that Apple has priced it out of the range of a middle-class household. If you could afford a $649 phone every three years in 2015 you can afford a $599 iPhone 8 in $2018. The Xr should be $649 next year if the pattern holds and be an excellent replacement for a 3 year old iPhone 7.
Call it "gaslighting" but the complaints are simply entitled bullshit. There's no "acceleration" in price increase. The replacement for the 6S Plus is the Xr at the same price point. There wasn't a replacement for the 6S but a viable replacement is $50 less expensive than the 6S was in 2015. The Xs is a higher tier product than the 6S was.
6S->7->8->Xr
Your entire argument is horseshit.
You can't charge more for more performance otherwise every product in existence is an order of magnitude better than previous products. Automobiles are much faster, fuel efficient and safer than past vehicles. By your distorted, stunted argument every Toyota Corolla or Honda Accord should ship for 80,000 "cuz look how much better they are!". Computers increase in performance over time. Their prices increase relative to pv calculations and inflation fluctuations. They might also increase as Wurthele astutely indicated because they have some intrinsic cost (ie support or services). However products shouldn't cost more just "cuz betta". That's nonsense because by definitions computers ard phones are *better* than the previous model. Otherwise, what would be the *point*?
Try googling "cars too expensive" and see how colossally stupid it was to use that to try to bolster your position.
And more importantly they are not "charing more for more performance". They are charging the SAME or LESS for more performance. The iPhone 8 is $50 cheaper than the 6S was at launch and much much faster. That the 6S was the most expensive tier in 2015 is immaterial. The Xr is the 2018 replacement for the 2015 6S (Plus). Just like the 8 was the 2017 replacement for the 7. That the X and Xs are two new premium tiers above the old line didn't make the old line more expensive.
Both the 8 and the X had an A11. Both the Xr and the Xs have an A12. None of the phones cheaper than the 6S had the A9 as the 6S in 2015.
-
The new Mac mini is a great machine, but a $499 model could serve a larger audience
txsbaker75 said:I'm still wondering why Apple didn't opt for a variant of the new Mini with the new Intel CPU/AMD GPU hybrid in it. They are clearly aiming this at more of a pro market. Lot's of rendering (or other tasks) could be offloaded to the Vega GPU, and you could pick up some gaming sales, too. Seems like a no-brainer to me. The performance of the Vega absolutely blows away the Intel integrated graphics in every metric. Apps using Metal2 should scream on that chip. Touting FCPX & Compressor performance on a box with integrated graphics seemed kind of odd after Apple has talked up the capabilities of Metal2 so much. My $0.02, as ever.
The i7 Mini w/32GB, 1TB SSD and 10GbE ($2600) + Vega ($1200) is $3800.
That leaves you a $1200 budget for keyboard, mouse and monitor in comparison to the base iMac Pro at $4999 (also with 32GB and 1 TB SSD). While the iMac Pro is faster (2 cores worth) the Mini enjoys higher single core performance and likely better thermal management for the Vega.
Complaints that the mini is "too expensive" ignores that it is the most cost effective Mac in the entire line up at every pricing tier. This IS the mini that folks have been waiting for since 2012. Forget the $499 base price. This is like bitching the iPhone XR is too expensive at $749. People are asking for the Mac product line entry point to essentially be the same as the iPhone product line entry point (the two year old iPhone 7 at $449). You want a $499 Mac? Buy the 2014 just like you buy the iPhone 7. Still available new from Best Buy.
Fuck you people (not you txsbaker75, yours was a perfectly fine question). It's insanely stupid to be outraged that the Mini base price moved to $799 when it offers so much bang for the buck.
I believe that succinctly enumerates my position on this matter.
-
The new Mac mini is a great machine, but a $499 model could serve a larger audience
Mike Wuerthele said:nht said:AppleInsider said:
The market appears to be there for a $499 Mac mini, so the the only two questions left is whether Apple wants to enter that price-point again, or is capable of manufacturing a machine for that price. It certainly managed to build them right up to about last Tuesday when it finally replaced the $499 Mac mini with this new design.
Apple is already going to lose more valuable iMac sales to Mini sales as the new minis have very high bang for the buck.
And did Apple lose the edu market to Chromebooks or Google Docs? You aren't going to beat $200 chromebooks with a $500 Mac when the $300 iPads can't make a significant dent.
You still need to show that the $500 price point would sufficiently increase Mac sales so that it's a positive outcome even counting service income. What's more, the buyers of $500 PCs are likely not as good a demographic for services than $800 PC buyers...just like the buyers of $100 Android phones are not as good a demographic for services as $600+ iPhone buyers.
So that's still not a good business case for introducing a $500 mini and trashing your $1200 iMac sales when the $300 iPad already exists and is positioned within the Apple product line for the edu/low end market.
And iOS devices trounce MacOS devices in volume. So service income is largely dominated by iPads (ie cars) than Macs (trucks) anyway. -
The new Mac mini is a great machine, but a $499 model could serve a larger audience
AppleInsider said:
The market appears to be there for a $499 Mac mini, so the the only two questions left is whether Apple wants to enter that price-point again, or is capable of manufacturing a machine for that price. It certainly managed to build them right up to about last Tuesday when it finally replaced the $499 Mac mini with this new design.
Apple is already going to lose more valuable iMac sales to Mini sales as the new minis have very high bang for the buck.
And did Apple lose the edu market to Chromebooks or Google Docs? You aren't going to beat $200 chromebooks with a $500 Mac when the $300 iPads can't make a significant dent. -
First look at the new space gray 2018 Mac mini