cpsro

Fair warning! If he filed for a copyright, then he may be entitled to triple the $0 in damages he has suffered.

mknelson said:

"For example, a Tesla was seen in a video from 2021 driving at high speed in a residential area and hiding a child riding a bike."

Hiding? Like, in the Frunk?

My inference was the car hit the child.

I can do without paying $15K extra for a Fully Self Driving vehicle that isn't and really never will be.

Apple's lawyers should've been able to swat this problem away without trouble.
https://www.applejazz.com/about.htm
"AppleJazz Records began as a way for Charlie Bertini to promote the recordings of his "AppleJazz Band".
So AppleJazz Records promotes the sale of recordings, not so much live concerts.

His registered trademark is "Apple Jazz" (with a space), not "AppleJazz" (no space). He's not even using the registered trademark. If he stuck to using AppleJazz (no space), I don't see any confusion. His application even has the disclaimer "NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "JAZZ" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN." Well, what about the right to use APPLE? In my opinion, he doesn't mention APPLE, because his intent is not to obtain a trademark he wishes to use but only to interfere with Apple Inc. and obtain a lucrative settlement with the company.

It was only in 2016 that Bertini finally applied for the "Apple Jazz" trademark (which he doesn't use), a year after Apple applied for theirs.

Archive.org has old webpages from applejazz.com going back to 2004. Even then, Bertini was using AppleJazz (no space).

So the U.S. makes an exception for one corporation, not an entire country.