p-dog

These Samsung watches, which have a tiny share of the wearables market, are limiting themselves even more by shutting themselves off from the dominant smart phone platform in many wealthy markets. Coincidentally, the Apple Watch, the #1 selling watch in the world, is becoming, albeit slowly, ever more independent of the iPhone. Which one is the winning strategy? Hmmm…

OutdoorAppDeveloper said:

Super desirable watch and the $250 price is reasonable too. If this were an iWatch we would all be falling all over ourselves to hit the buy now button. The health features are way better than an Apple Watch too.

You lost all credibility when you said “iWatch”.

rob53 said:

The politicians are listening (being bought by) to loudmouth, greedy developers. I wish they would listen to users instead. If they did, we’d want a closed, secure, easy to purchase App Store. 

They are also acting on behalf of Microsoft, who has been in the background trying to manipulate the situation the whole time, yet somehow a $2+ trillion market cap tech company not subject to any of this round of “regulation” or even minimal scrutiny.

I removed the speaker from the AirTag I hid on my bicycle, but I never thought about using a second, decoy AirTag. I’ll order another one right away!

Ah, I see the South Korean government is bending over and twerking at the behest of one of its biggest corporate pimps: Samsung.