tallest skil

entropys said:
And who puts flavouring in their coffee? Americans can be such Philistines!

If you knew the kind of crap that passes for coffee over here, you’d flavor it, too. And I don’t even drink the stuff. I just like the smell. OF GOOD COFFEE. Brand name garbage doesn’t even smell good, much less taste like anything other than liquid burnt.

ascii said:

Darn, sounds like its not a laptop. What could "combo station" mean though?

Remember the DuoDock? Apple has had new patents for quite some time now.

nunzy said:

But most people don't care if a speaker sounds 1 percent better

Very true.

good enough for most people

A disheartening tagline that Apple has embraced as of late.

gatorguy said:

The only remaining question is how much revenue Samsung is entitled to keep from those infringing US (only) handset sales.

0%.

GeorgeBMac said:

Despite how its spun, it isn't "government control".   It's prohibiting carriers like AT&T from controlling what you will have access to on the internet.

Conceptually, yes. In (historic) practice, no.

foregoneconclusion said:

What's an example of a scary power? 

Just one: All ISPs were forced to censor everything the government said to censor (and the bill explicitly did not define what the government is and is not allowed to censor) or they’d get their licensing revoked, Which means only pre-existing ISPs can ever operate. Which means total information control. Which means the opposite of net neutrality.

Read the bill. It’s 3000 pages. Can’t be that hard. I know that no one in Congress read it, but you can.