joogabah
About
- Username
- joogabah
- Joined
- Visits
- 54
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 167
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 139
Reactions
-
House committee invites Apple CEO Tim Cook, FBI Director James Comey to discuss encryption
robroy72 said:The biggest part of this problem is when you get people yapping their mouths who do not know what they are talking about. Most people have no real clue how the technological processes are setup for these systems to work and for proper security to be in place. "Oh just have Apple make a program to get into the device" -- shows how little these government lawyers at the Justice Department and politicians (Trump, Obama & most in DC) know how this stuff works.
In turn you have other incompetent staff at San Bernardino County that have no clue on how to properly manage iOS devices in an enterprise environment.
And to think -- some people want more government in our lives and "caring" for us!The government is only feigning incompetence. They probably orchestrated San Bernardino in order to provide a justification for this. That's what fascist governments do. America turned the corner when it installed an unelected president and started launching aggressive wars against countries that didn't threaten or attack it. -
House committee invites Apple CEO Tim Cook, FBI Director James Comey to discuss encryption
bugsnw said:I think if this was another company, people would think it prudent to help unlock phones on a court-ordered by court-ordered basis. The odds of this technology getting out are quite low. Both sides make a great case. I just lean slightly towards national security on this one. Even with an encryption key safeguarded by the govt./FBI, I would feel like my data was safe from prying eyes. We don't have all that much privacy out in the wild as it is. It's part of the give and take of rights vs. safety.
-
House committee invites Apple CEO Tim Cook, FBI Director James Comey to discuss encryption
G. Ned C. said:I have everything I could find on this subject this week in trying to decide how I feel about it. It is a very difficult issue for me. I can clearly see both sides. We all want to know where domestic terrorists might strike next, and we all want to insure that our phones and associated cloud storage are secure from would-be hackers. At least for now, I side with Apple. I don't want to slide down that slippery slope, at least in this instance. I think it highly unlikely that they will find anything useful on this guy's work phone, after having destroyed their personal phones and removed/destroyed the hard drive in their computer. Maybe in a different situation, but let's not go there quite yet.
-
US Department of Justice files motion to force Apple to crack terrorist's iPhone
dogman said:Where was the NSA on this? Weren't they listening in on the terrorists conversations?They don't actually care about the "terrorists". Most if not all of the events are false flags. That's why there's a narrative that uses social manipulation to hush up anyone who dares to question the official story.History has made ruling elites very aware of what happens when capitalism collapses.The real threat is national rivalry and class war. So they launch wars of aggression and start spying on everybody.It has nothing to do with "evil people". It is economically determined, and a forgotten lesson of the 20th century.The only solution is total automation and the abandonment of money. That's difficult to swallow for a lot of people, but no matter. It doesn't depend on their emotional reactions.