... about a 166 MHz bus? 867/166 = 5.22 (nope) 1000/166 = 6 (this works) 1250/166 = ... machine must have a 166 MHz bus, then it holds that only 166 MHz DDR RAM (333MHz ... may bear on the 133/166 issue: why does Macminute ...

... , like a DDR and/or 166 bus. But even that wouldn ...

... may bear on the 133/166 issue: why does Macminute say ... uses a 133 bus, not 166. But maybe... But Skullmac's ... there isn't any SDR-166 RAM.

... there isn't any SDR-166 RAM. Actually, 333 doesn't ...

I'm not sure anymore but the bus multiplier are this, no ? 133,33 x 6,5 = 866,64 = 867 MHz 133,33 x 7,5 = 999,97 = 1 GHz 166,66 x 6,0 = 999,96 = 1 GHz 166,66 x 7,5 = 1249,95 = 1.25 GHz (MacMinute) 133,33 x 9,0 = 1199,97 = 1.2 GHz (Think Secret)

... we're headed towards DDR 166 on the high end models ...

... FSB, but rather a plain 166 FSB with (x-serve-style ... , but I'd believe a 166 bus. Overall, I think if ...

... Ghz ? How? 166 * 7,5=1,25 Ghz...166 SDRAM ?--> NO ... dont think these multipiers exist.. 166/333 DDR Hack? No! They ...

... so. This would be around 166.67x5.5 (917) or 166x6 ...

... . DDR 333 is on a 166 bus. Lesson 2: Multipliers work ... increments. Lesson 3: Half of 166 is 83. Lesson 4: It's actually 133.33 and 166.67, to be more precise. Therefore: 1250/166.67=7.5 A 1 ... is a chip with a 166.67 MHz FSB with a ...

... .25 Ghz G4 with a 166 MHz bus and 333 MHz ...

... effective, you'd have a 166 mHz processor bus. And the ... MX bus could do that. 166.666666667 * 7.5 = 1250.000025 Remember, each pulse of the 166 clock gets 2 chunks of ...

... top end is clearly a 166.The middle 1 ghrz could ... a 1.25 on a 166 bus then why not give ... ghrz low end on a 166 bus and a middle system ...

... % improvement (ish) 133 FSB -> 166 FSB = about 20-25% improvement ...

... % improvement (ish) 133 FSB -> 166 FSB = about 20-25% improvement ...

... made PC166 SDRAM, a prospective 166 MHz MPX FSB + PC166 SDRAM ... , if Apple can ship a 166 MHz bus this soon, I ...

1.25 GHz? What is that? Is that 9.5 x 133 MHz = 1263 MHz Or is it 7.5 x 166 MHz = 1245 MHz Someone care to speculate?

... is it 7.5 x 166 MHz = 1245 MHz Someone care ... ? 1.25GHz = 166.66MHz X 7.5 1GHz = 166.66MHz X 6 ...

166 Mhz FSB, finally. I'm going to replace my G3/266 (oc'd from 233) with the dual 1 Ghz. Do you think I'll notice the difference in OS X?

... towers will absolutely scream: 1. 166 MHz bus with 333 DDR ...

... is the faster system-bus (166 vs. 133) and the new ...

That 166 MHz system bus will own ...

The first G4's (I own a 450AGP) have a 100Mhz bus... Does anyone have a source for say... 450Mhz/100Mhz vs. 466Mhz/133Mhz 500Mhz/100Mhz vs. 533Mhz/133Mhz This could give us some idea as to how the new DP1Ghz/166 will face off against the DP1Ghz/133. Dave

I'm not ultra informed but I wouldn't consider it highly likely. A FSB at 166 MHz seems quite probable but otherwise to get full benefit from DDR memory I expect they'd have to take the memory controller on-chip, which I doubt has been done yet.

... of G4-processors @ 1167 MHz. 166/333 DDR-RAM is up ... design goes, faster than regular 166 MHz is highly unlikely. If ...

166.66 (167 rounded) * 64-bits ( ... .333GBps or 1.3GBps rounded. 166.66 * 64-bits * 2 = 2 ...

... quote]Originally posted by Kecksy: 166.66 (167 rounded) * 64-bits ... .333GBps or 1.3GBps rounded. 166.66 * 64-bits * 2 = 2 ...

... quote]Originally posted by Kecksy: 166.66 (167 rounded) * 64-bits ... .333GBps or 1.3GBps rounded. 166.66 * 64-bits * 2 = 2 ... the numbers are more like 166.666666666666666666... and 133.333333333333333...so ...

... bus [front side bus (FSB)] 166.67 MHz 64 bit = 1 ... MHz 4x32 bit ---| [system controller] |--- 166.67 MHz 2x64 bit --- | PC2700 ...

... have no issues running at 166. However, 166 x 6.5 = 1080 ... may not cope with a 166 bus. It would have been ...