An American in Taliban?!

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Whoa! I almost lost my cookies when they showed that first video clip last night. You could immediately tell he was American...



Seems this wacko from Washington DC (ironic ain't it?) went to the middle east and then joined the Taliban because "his heart became attched to them".



He was captured by the NA and almost died in that prison uprising.



He's now in US custody. Better keep him away from me too...



<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/12/03/ret.american.taliban/index.html"; target="_blank">CNN's Exclusive Report</a>
«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 90
    I hope to god they try him for treason. If his actions didn't lead to any American deaths then I'd be fine with him sitting in jail for some years.
  • Reply 2 of 90
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    Agreed. Let the POS rot....
  • Reply 3 of 90
    I think about 5 years should do it.
  • Reply 4 of 90
    brussellbrussell Posts: 9,812member
    I actually had sympathy for him - it seemed like he was just some dumb guy, the kind of person who might join a cult, and then got sucked into the Taliban without really knowing what it was about.



    It didn't seem like he went in with a hatred of America or a desire to be a terrorist or something. But I didn't see that much info about it.
  • Reply 5 of 90
    jeffyboyjeffyboy Posts: 1,055member
    John Rocker's in the Taliban? This explains so much! Oh wait, it's Walker...





    Jeff
  • Reply 6 of 90
    They should just sentence him to walk down to the WTC wreckage and introduce himself to the recovery crew. That would take care of him pretty quick.
  • Reply 7 of 90
    macaddictmacaddict Posts: 1,055member
    He's gonna be dead before he gets out of the hospital!
  • Reply 8 of 90
    [quote]Originally posted by MacAddict:

    <strong>He's gonna be dead before he gets out of the hospital!</strong><hr></blockquote>



    No he wont. The American SF have control of him.
  • Reply 9 of 90
    ac2cac2c Posts: 60member
    Hmm, he is still a US citizen so we won't get to see him tried before a tribunal - or will we? All we have to do is revoke his citizenship (and I beleive surving in a foreign military may do that) and we can try him before a military tribunal. Hmm, I'm need to ask a lawyer friend of mine if he revoked his citizenship or not. It makes for a very interesting legal problem for all concerned - especially him.
  • Reply 10 of 90
    [quote]Originally posted by ac2c:

    <strong>Hmm, he is still a US citizen so we won't get to see him tried before a tribunal - or will we? All we have to do is revoke his citizenship (and I beleive surving in a foreign military may do that) and we can try him before a military tribunal. Hmm, I'm need to ask a lawyer friend of mine if he revoked his citizenship or not. It makes for a very interesting legal problem for all concerned - especially him.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    More hysteria predicting the coming (or is here now we just don't know it) police state.
  • Reply 11 of 90
    [quote]Originally posted by BRussell:

    <strong>I actually had sympathy for him - it seemed like he was just some dumb guy, the kind of person who might join a cult, and then got sucked into the Taliban without really knowing what it was about.



    It didn't seem like he went in with a hatred of America or a desire to be a terrorist or something. But I didn't see that much info about it.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    It seems he did condone the WTC and Pentagon attacks. It's easy for fundamentalist religions to sway disenfranchised and mixed up youths. Just as it is with government propaganda. He got it both ways. Don't feel sorry for him one bit. He'll probably get off on a mental case defense...
  • Reply 12 of 90
    alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
    i hope they rip every useful bit of information from this guy, then either reprogram his ass or execute him.



    nobody seems to think treason is a big deal anymore.
  • Reply 13 of 90
    The kid went to the Middle East to study Islam. It was when he was already over there that he got mixed up with the Taliban and joined their forces (long before Sept. 11).



    The Taliban aren't the terrorists, Al Qaeda is. Unless we can prove that he either worked for Al Qaeda or fired on U.S. troops then there's no way we can take him to trial for treason.



    If whatever Afgani gov't comes forward and wants to try him (and other Taliban soldiers) for crimes against the Afgani people then they should, but I don't think there's anything the U.S. gov't can try him against.



    Too bad there are no laws against being a dumb-ass.
  • Reply 14 of 90
    [quote]Originally posted by GraphX:

    <strong>



    The Taliban aren't the terrorists, Al Qaeda is. Unless we can prove that he either worked for Al Qaeda or fired on U.S. troops then there's no way we can take him to trial for treason.



    If whatever Afgani gov't comes forward and wants to try him (and other Taliban soldiers) for crimes against the Afgani people then they should, but I don't think there's anything the U.S. gov't can try him against.

    </strong><hr></blockquote>





    First off, you can't draw such a distinction between the Taliban and Al Qaeda. They operate hand in glove.



    Secondly, if an American citizen taking up arms on foreign soil AGAINST AMERICAN TROOPS (whether or not he actually succeeded in killing any) isn't treason, I'd love to know what IS.
  • Reply 15 of 90
    fran441fran441 Posts: 3,715member
    If he doesn't get put away for the rest of his life (or gets no jail time at all), it's really condoning people that want to go and fight in foreign wars.



    If he gets away with it, what's to keep someone else going to fight with them? Just because he was born in America, doesn't mean he won't be tried for treason.
  • Reply 16 of 90
    [quote]Originally posted by GraphX:

    <strong>The Taliban aren't the terrorists, Al Qaeda is. Unless we can prove that he either worked for Al Qaeda or fired on U.S. troops then there's no way we can take him to trial for treason. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    He says he did join and/or train with Al Qaeda. He trained at camps where Osama showed up several times.



    I wonder if he knew or had any hint of "something big" on the 11th?
  • Reply 17 of 90
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    I have no sympathy at all for this bastard. He's not dumb...finished some accelerated high school curriculum when he was 16...moved to the middle east, studied Arabic and excelled at it. Then later became fascinated with the Taliban and their "causes." He knew exactly what he was doing.



    Coming from a Berkley-like area in California, it shouldn't surprise us this kid thought he was some kind of radical crusader against the evil capitalists. Even the guy's Dad seems more sorry that his son has endured hardship in a prison, than the fact that he's a freaking traitor to his country.



    Said something like "Well, I want to give my son a big hug because we miss him, and also maybe a kick in the butt because he didn't ask my permission to go to the middle east." What a fu*king numb-skull. How about "We are extremely disappointed in and embarrassed by our son's actions, and he will have to face whatever legal challenges that come on his own."



    As Cartman would say, what a bunch of tree-huggin' hippie CRAP!



    <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />
  • Reply 18 of 90
    To those crying out "Oh no, not TREASON!" I give you the following definition:



    The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death.
  • Reply 19 of 90
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    Amen, brother.
  • Reply 20 of 90
    brussellbrussell Posts: 9,812member
    [quote]Originally posted by ac2c:

    <strong>Hmm, he is still a US citizen so we won't get to see him tried before a tribunal - or will we? All we have to do is revoke his citizenship (and I beleive surving in a foreign military may do that) and we can try him before a military tribunal.</strong><hr></blockquote>Actually, there's no basic principle that says military tribunals can't be used on American citizens. Bush's current order specifices only non-citizens, but that could be changed as easily as revoking his citizenship.
Sign In or Register to comment.