Apple skips pricey Super Bowl ad, pays homage to 30 years of Mac via online movie shot using iPhones

Posted:
in General Discussion edited February 2014
Despite rumors to the contrary, Apple on Sunday chose not to plunk down millions in order to commemorate the 30th Anniversary of the Mac during this year's Super Bowl, and instead released a short movie online that it composed entirely with its own consumer products.

Update: Apple has posted a "behind the scenes" video highlighting the effort taken to coordinate a full day's worth of filmmaking in 15 locations across five continents. The video is embedded at the bottom of this page.

Apple Mac 30th Anniversary


The 90-second clip, which is now live on the company's website and shareable via YouTube, was composed in secret on the January 24th, the actual day the Mac turned 30. Representatives from Apple used only iPhones to film scenes in 10 different countries spread over 5 continents during a 36 hour period, and then cut and edited the clips exclusively on Macs.



"Thirty years ago Macintosh promised to put technology in the hands of the people," the movie begins. "To celebrate Mac's birthday, this film was shot around the world in one day, entirely on iPhone. Here's to the next thirty."


In the scenes that follow over the next 85 seconds, Apple shows how that promise has been upheld and extended to empower parents, students, and professionals across a variety of industries from education, robotics and archeology, to fashion and the arts.

Its debut exclusively through online outlets also underscores the dramatic shift in the Cupertino-based company's marketing approach over the past 30 years since it first introduced the Mac to the world via the then controversial -- but now legendary -- "1984" Super Bowl ad.

In the week leading up to Sunday's big game, there was slight chatter around the possibility of Apple marking a return to the Super Bowl after Lee Clow, the chairman of Apple's longtime ad agency TBWA\Worldwide, issued a cryptic tweet that appeared to hint in that direction.

Apple Mac 30th Anniversary


As it turns out, Clow was among the first phone calls at the beginning of the project, according to Apple's detailed account of the movie's production. It was directed by Jake Scott, son of the legendary director Ridley Scott who took the reigns behind Apple's original "1984" spot, and edited by Angus Wall.

Because so much footage had to be edited so quickly, Wall employed a team of 21 editors to piece the story together with the direction of Scott, who transformed a sound stage in Los Angeles into a command center.

Apple Mac 30th Anniversary


"He equipped it with an arsenal of Apple products including iMac, Mac Pro, and iPad, along with large projection displays positioned around the room," Apple said. "From there he was able to watch every scene as it was shot, and direct all the action remotely via FaceTime."

Apple said that many involved in the production of the movie believe this innovative approach to a multilocation shoot will inevitably be adopted by other filmmakers going forward.

Behind the scenes:

«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 88
    jeromecjeromec Posts: 193member
    Looks like you embedded the wrong movie :-)
    The one you embedded, with Mac celebrities, was already on apple.com.

    Here's the YouTube URL for the "1.24.14" movie:
  • Reply 2 of 88
    smaffeismaffei Posts: 237member
    And, if Steve were alive, he would have jumped at a chance to rekindle that 1984 magic (even at the steep price of a Super Bowl Ad). Just goes to show you, this new Apple isn't going in the direction that Steve would have envisioned.
  • Reply 3 of 88
    I expected more Mac in the video and less iPhones and iPads. I get it, Apple is trying to play them up as evolutionary descendants but those devices get enough love and coverage. This video should have been solely about the Mac, period.
  • Reply 4 of 88
    iqatedoiqatedo Posts: 1,824member

    Enjoyed the video, very nice thanks Apple.

  • Reply 5 of 88
    macxpressmacxpress Posts: 5,818member

    Why do people always think Apple is going to run a Superbowl Ad? As much as some like the ads, they really don't do much. How many of the ads do you remember from last night? How many do you remember from last year? I think its a waste of money and Apple was right not to run an ad. 

  • Reply 6 of 88
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by macxpress View Post

     

    Why do people always think Apple is going to run a Superbowl Ad? As much as some like the ads, they really don't do much. How many of the ads do you remember from last night? How many do you remember from last year? I think its a waste of money and Apple was right not to run an ad. 


    The ads last night were the absolute dullest I can remember in a Super Bowl.

     

    The Dylan/Chrysler ad was the exception.

  • Reply 7 of 88
    jungmarkjungmark Posts: 6,926member
    smaffei wrote: »
    And, if Steve were alive, he would have jumped at a chance to rekindle that 1984 magic (even at the steep price of a Super Bowl Ad). Just goes to show you, this new Apple isn't going in the direction that Steve would have envisioned.

    You left the sarcasm tag off.
  • Reply 8 of 88
    bdkennedy1bdkennedy1 Posts: 1,459member

    Boring.

  • Reply 9 of 88
    macxpressmacxpress Posts: 5,818member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post

     

    The ads last night were the absolute dullest I can remember in a Super Bowl.

     

    The Dylan/Chrysler ad was the exception.


     

    Chrysler has a great marketing team. For the past few years they've always ran amazing and inspiring ads. 

     

    Still though, I really don't see the point in running a $3 million ad for one night. Its a waste of money. 

  • Reply 10 of 88
    arlorarlor Posts: 532member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by smaffei View Post



    And, if Steve were alive, he would have jumped at a chance to rekindle that 1984 magic (even at the steep price of a Super Bowl Ad). Just goes to show you, this new Apple isn't going in the direction that Steve would have envisioned.

     

    Like he did in 2009, 2004, 1999, etc.?

  • Reply 11 of 88
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Smart move Apple. People will talk about this ad regardless and you didn't have to spend millions plus fight for discussion time amongst all the other ads that were shown last night.
  • Reply 12 of 88
    macxpressmacxpress Posts: 5,818member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by smaffei View Post



    And, if Steve were alive, he would have jumped at a chance to rekindle that 1984 magic (even at the steep price of a Super Bowl Ad). Just goes to show you, this new Apple isn't going in the direction that Steve would have envisioned.

     

    Stop with if Steve we alive shit. Nobody knows what Steve would have done. You don't, I don't, nobody does. Steve isn't here anymore...get over it. 

  • Reply 13 of 88
    zarenzaren Posts: 49member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by smaffei View Post



    And, if Steve were alive, he would have jumped at a chance to rekindle that 1984 magic (even at the steep price of a Super Bowl Ad). Just goes to show you, this new Apple isn't going in the direction that Steve would have envisioned.

    "If you want to live your life in a creative way, as an artist, you have to not look back too much. You have to be willing to take whatever you've done and whoever you were and throw them away." -- Steve Jobs

     

    Apple already revisited the 1984 commercial in 2004 when they edited an iPod onto the runner. Going back to it again would have looked like they were running our of original ideas... and we know that's not true.

  • Reply 14 of 88
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    I would have sent one of those teams to South America.
  • Reply 15 of 88

    Apple better not be wasting money on Super Bowl ads.  They should be returning that money to shareholders.

  • Reply 16 of 88
    flaneurflaneur Posts: 4,526member
    Apple better not be wasting money on Super Bowl ads.  They should be returning that money to shareholders.

    You have been busy trying to drive the stock price down with your FUD for months. YOU should be returning money to shareholders.
    tikiman wrote: »
    I expected more Mac in the video and less iPhones and iPads. I get it, Apple is trying to play them up as evolutionary descendants but those devices get enough love and coverage. This video should have been solely about the Mac, period.

    It's the 30th anniversary of technology for the people, not so much of the Mac, but what it represents. Mythic thinking vs. your literal thinking.
  • Reply 17 of 88
    flaneurflaneur Posts: 4,526member
    Anyway, it's a great feast for the eyes, and it makes the point about Apple's mission very well.

    The background story about the FaceTime-enabled shooting and the Mac-centric editing is typical Apple, extracting the meaning of the ad and making it do double duty.
  • Reply 18 of 88
    Originally Posted by smaffei View Post

    And, if Steve were alive, he would have jumped at a chance to rekindle that 1984 magic (even at the steep price of a Super Bowl Ad). Just goes to show you, this new Apple isn't going in the direction that Steve would have envisioned.

     

    /s

     

    Originally Posted by Constable Odo View Post

    Apple better not be wasting money on Super Bowl ads.  They should be returning that money to shareholders.

     

    Just sell your stock and shut up about Apple giving you money.

  • Reply 19 of 88
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,256member

    Does anyone know what brand of iPhone holder the videographer used in the photo above? Hopefully it costs less than the great stuff at Zacuto.

  • Reply 20 of 88
    Apple was right to take a pass on that SuperBowl ad. The NFL already rips the public off by threatening to leave a city if it doesn't buy them a fancy stadium. Ripping us off for overpriced ads is adding insult to injury.
Sign In or Register to comment.