iTMS won't let me buy song even with U.S. address
Okay, what's going on. I thought as long as you had an American address tied to your credit card, you could order from Apple.
I know this is the case with hardware purchases I've made in the past where stuff was shipped to my brother in the U.S.
I don't know...maybe it's some legality concerning downloading to a foreign country (Canada in this case).
Come on Apple, you've got 30 million up here who want to buy into your music store...what's the hold up?
I know this is the case with hardware purchases I've made in the past where stuff was shipped to my brother in the U.S.
I don't know...maybe it's some legality concerning downloading to a foreign country (Canada in this case).
Come on Apple, you've got 30 million up here who want to buy into your music store...what's the hold up?
Comments
It's the record labels.
Originally posted by ast3r3x
IT IS NOT THEIR FAULT THERE ISN'T A STORE IN CANADA.
It's the record labels.
Hmm...you're telling me Apple can't iron out a deal with the record labels in Canada (who the majority of them are subsidaries of the larger U.S. labels)?
It's not a matter of ability, but rather a matter of will...or in this case probably, priorities.
Originally posted by satchmo
Hmm...you're telling me Apple can't iron out a deal with the record labels in Canada (who the majority of them are subsidaries of the larger U.S. labels)?
It's not a matter of ability, but rather a matter of will...or in this case probably, priorities.
In a recent article it shows Apple will take its ball and go home if people aren't willing to play by their rules. That is how you get uniform $.99/song $9.99/album instead of different prices and different DRM.
Originally posted by satchmo
Hmm...you're telling me Apple can't iron out a deal with the record labels in Canada (who the majority of them are subsidaries of the larger U.S. labels)?
It's not a matter of ability, but rather a matter of will...or in this case probably, priorities.
It's not the labels. It's the government and its backward rules. Canadian fair-use laws clash Apple's iTMS EULA. In Canada, anybody can borrow a CD and legally copy the music off it with certain considerations.
You can borrow a friends CD and copy it to a CD-R.
You cannot accept a pre-copied CD-R from your friend.
You can accept the original CD and a blank CD-R from your friend.
You cannot let people borrow the copy.
et cetera.
As a result, there is a tax on CD-R media, and now on other storage drives as well... And WHY? Why should I pay a music tax on a CD-R I use to back-up my files (non-copyrighted).
Anyway, how would any of this apply to digital distributed music?
They really need to hammer out a new law for digital music.
Originally posted by Eugene
As a result, there is a tax on CD-R media, and now on other storage drives as well... And WHY? Why should I pay a music tax on a CD-R I use to back-up my files (non-copyrighted).
Anyway, how would any of this apply to digital distributed music?
They really need to hammer out a new law for digital music.
actually, there is somewhat of a tax on cd-r's in the us as well., but only on cd-r's that are labels as MUSIC CD-Rs. many of the home audio cd recorders(not the computer based ones, but the ones for stereo equipement that can make audio cd's) require the music cd-rs(they have a bit turned on that says its a music cdr, they wont take regular cd-rs). so. if you dont have one of those things, dont get a cd-r that is made for music, get a regular cheap one. and avoid paying the riaa fee.
Originally posted by Matsu
Frankly, if I've no excuse to pay $.99 for something I could get better (2nd hand CD) or cheaper (file share), then I'm happier for it.
Yes, but I'd much rather pay $.99 than fork out $5-10 for a used CD from which I only want one song.
All is fine...and I just purchased my first track.