artharg

About

Username
artharg
Joined
Visits
17
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
76
Badges
0
Posts
27

Reactions

41Like7Informative

  • German data privacy regulator probes Apple Store temperature checks

    arthargartharg
    It may sound strange to non-Europeans but yes, this does seem to violate the GDPR. People may be forced to go to an Apple Store, say for dropping off a device for repairs, for instruction or whatever. Those are not cases where one could say "Just don't go" or "Go somewhere else". And trivial as it sounds: reading someone's body temperature is a medical check. Medical data have extra protection under European law. Apple would need a very good reason to do this. "Checking to see if someone is infected with SARS-CoV-2" is not good enough. Not having an elevated temperature doesn't say you're not infected or infectious. And having an elevated temperature doesn't mean it stems from COVID-19.

    In short: Apple are demanding customers submit to a medical procedure that is not fit for purpose and enforcing that by withholding service to people who don't. Which is forbidden under European law.

    Fines are not small either. They may run up to 4% of the global turnover in the previous year. So Apple would do well to reconsider.
    svanstromgatorguysphericavon b7muthuk_vanalingam

  • Apple testing USB security key support for Safari

    arthargartharg
    emoeller said:
    If Apple does adopt this it will most likely be hard coded to the Apple T series chips.
    Why? The benefit of USB keys is exactly that you can take them from system to system. It makes no sense to lock them to a T-chip that is bound to a specific system.
    macxpressgatorguyfastasleepwilliamlondonwatto_cobra

  • US appeals court says public has right to sue Apple over App Store exclusivity

    arthargartharg
    When Apple is compelled to allow third parties to bypass the App Store (i.e. when consumers win any suits they bring) they will have to implement a way to allow third parties to install apps. If they sandbox those apps more than they sandbox App Store apps, they'll face yet another set of suits alleging they are impeding competition by unfairly limiting the abilities of non-App Store apps. If they lose those suits, they'll have to allow non-App Store apps the same access as their vetted App Store apps, only without the vetting. They will have the same access as vetted apps, just no check on what they do with the data. And I bet that one of the first apps to take advantage of that would be one called "Backdoor" by FBI Software Inc. You'd still have to unlock the phone to allow installation, but from that moment on all your data are basically compromised.
    radarthekat