teejay2012
About
- Username
- teejay2012
- Joined
- Visits
- 87
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 808
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 371
Reactions
-
Apple responds to DOJ antitrust lawsuit by refuting every claim
avon b7 said:"Apple responded by stating that the claim was misleading."
I wouldn't say the case against Apple is going to be a walkover for Apple. We'll have to wait and see and perhaps what will be more interesting are the breadcrumbs of information relative to internal communications that might drop along the way.
Wow I could not quote the whole rant for lack of electrons... An Android phone user in the EU has a lot of time on their hands to write out such a lengthy post on Apple, yet it remains full of errors. Avon b7 must be an EU regulator.
-
EU launches mass DMA violation probes against Apple, Google, and Meta
nubus said:2. US is running a huge trade deficit towards the EU. Seems we're doing fine in producing what you want. From BMW to Wegovy.
It has grown to 30B with EU. More money than I have LOL, but that is trivial compared to China which is almost $400B. Yes the EU makes things. But China makes things cheaper, especially high value tech.
-
EU launches mass DMA violation probes against Apple, Google, and Meta
Vestager uses a lot of 'we feel' and 'we are concerned'. Fortunately EU courts are more about the letter of the law than interpretations and I hope this will be like the Apple-Irish tax case. Still this has got to be painful for Apple and the other companies she has targeted. It also makes me wonder how much of this could have been avoided by changes in Apple policies and behaviour years ago, or if this was always going to be a 'EU vs US tech companies' showdown.
-
Analysts mostly nonplussed by DoJ suit, and believe Apple will win
Kuminga said:I work for an investment firm as a back end researcher and by yesterday afternoon , my bosses were basically laughing at this outdated and idiotic indictment and the fact that the actual attorney general was made to stand there and read these outdated charges .
I think Garland organized the show. It was intended to show that he can actually do something. I have my doubts for this case and for Garland's ability to win any case. It seems all the smart lawyers went to work for Samsung LOL.
-
Apple will crush the DoJ in court if Garland sticks with outdated arguments
here4this said:Shouldn’t a WATCH be compatible with the wearer regardless of the OS? It’s a WATCH. Imagine if Rolex decided that you have to have a Rolex phone to wear one of their watches.For the kind of money Rolex charges, I would make sure it worked for me before I purchased LOL.I do not think your example is even close, as Apple Watch interoperability did not change after your purchase. You can use an Apple Watch with Android phones, but you need an iPhone to complete the initial setup and there is quite a bit of functionality that is not available (ie Health metric syncing). But it does get messages and does work as a watch.