bulk001
About
- Username
- bulk001
- Joined
- Visits
- 395
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,187
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 764
Reactions
-
Despite Apple pushback, Oregon has passed its right-to-repair bill banning parts pairing
Well done Oregon! Look forward to seeing more States take similar steps for the benefit of consumers.
-
Apple will crush the DoJ in court if Garland sticks with outdated arguments
radarthekat said:
Why not this one? Maybe because the executive branch should not attempt to interfere with the judicial branch. Biden would be rightly criticized if he did attempt to interfere. Let the lawsuit play out on its merits, or lack thereof.h2p said:Mike Wuerthele said:
This started two years into the Trump administration.Madbum said:Joe Biden needs to go. I am sorry but I am not usually political but this guy is ridiculousSure did! Biden erased many of Trump's initiatives.- Why not this one?!- What's the angle?- Does the administration hate Apple that much that they are looking for Any reason to knock an American company?I appreciate the perspective of nudging Apple to change, but the ridiculous part is using a lawsuit to extract - what? extraction concessions? extract cash? - from Apple.
Additionally, the former President is arguing in a case that SCOTUS has agreed to hear that a President can do whatever they want without anyone being able to do anything about it. If that is the case then the current President can do whatever HE wants to do too and there is not a damn thing anyone can do about it either. Silly I know but it it applies to one then it applies to the other. In fact, Biden could just forgo the whole court case and jump to splitting Apple up. Again, ridiculous but that is where this silliness goes.radarthekat said:
Why not this one? Maybe because the executive branch should not attempt to interfere with the judicial branch. Biden would be rightly criticized if he did attempt to interfere. Let the lawsuit play out on its merits, or lack thereof.h2p said:Mike Wuerthele said:
This started two years into the Trump administration.Madbum said:Joe Biden needs to go. I am sorry but I am not usually political but this guy is ridiculousSure did! Biden erased many of Trump's initiatives.- Why not this one?!- What's the angle?- Does the administration hate Apple that much that they are looking for Any reason to knock an American company?I appreciate the perspective of nudging Apple to change, but the ridiculous part is using a lawsuit to extract - what? extraction concessions? extract cash? - from Apple.
-
Apple will crush the DoJ in court if Garland sticks with outdated arguments
Here you go with your opinions as facts - “quite obvious” The only thing that is becoming obvious to me it that you don’t seem to know what you are talking about.Kuminga said:
Talk to me when EU goes after the biggest Chinese company or their own biggest company. Or you think the Chinese companies or Biggest European companies are just angels compared to Apple Evil Empire.bulk001 said:
Your point was that the EU generally only goes after American companies. That is not true. I gave you three examples where you were wrong. Not sure how that “makes your point”. As for China, they have put limits on Huawei 5G equipment so one can hardly say it “never does anything” against Chinese firms (your sentence was a little vague so I could be misquoting you there.)Kuminga said:bulk001 said:
Greensill, Wirecard AG are two examples where they didn’t just go after companies, but shut them down. Glencore they heavily fined for taking bribes. That aside, the reason they probably do is that American companies could be coming in thinking they can do whatever they want while most EU companies are playing by the rules? You just made my point. Those companies are not Google or Apple. Also Notice the EU never does anything bs China,….Kuminga said:
The EU if you noticed, generally only goes after American Companies and never their own companies.bulk001 said:
Couple of thoughts, it isn’t Apple’s lawyers that AppleInsider is quoting. I doubt that Apple’s lawyer's see this as this simple or are so cavalier. Further, Apple couldn’t win a case where Cook made statements on a QER which is typically covered by a catch all disclaimer that is almost lawsuit proof and paid out close to a half billion dollars that AppleInsider then blew off as insignificant. They couldn’t hold off the EU regulations and also just got hit with a 1.84B Euro fine. Their brilliant legal minds also sued a tiny company with a pear logo and ended up having to help redesign their logo given the public blowback. They lost the Apple Watch case and settled with Qualcomm. This is their top notch legal team that they are bringing to this fight?fastasleep said:
If only Apple had a few actual lawyers and stuff.bulk001 said:Only time will tell if you are right. Why don’t you reschedule this post for an update in 2 years. Personally my money is on the DOJ who, you know has actual lawyers and stuff, as opposed to two writers of an Apple blog.
Please, it quite obvious EU has no fear of any repercussions from American leadership when they attack American companies that they would get of it’s a Chinese company or big European companies -
Apple will crush the DoJ in court if Garland sticks with outdated arguments
Your point was that the EU generally only goes after American companies. That is not true. I gave you three examples where you were wrong. Not sure how that “makes your point”. As for China, they have put limits on Huawei 5G equipment so one can hardly say it “never does anything” against Chinese firms (your sentence was a little vague so I could be misquoting you there.)Kuminga said:
You just made my point. Those companies are not Google or Apple. Also Notice the EU never does anything bs China,….bulk001 said:
Greensill, Wirecard AG are two examples where they didn’t just go after companies, but shut them down. Glencore they heavily fined for taking bribes. That aside, the reason they probably do is that American companies could be coming in thinking they can do whatever they want while most EU companies are playing by the rules?Kuminga said:
The EU if you noticed, generally only goes after American Companies and never their own companies.bulk001 said:
Couple of thoughts, it isn’t Apple’s lawyers that AppleInsider is quoting. I doubt that Apple’s lawyer's see this as this simple or are so cavalier. Further, Apple couldn’t win a case where Cook made statements on a QER which is typically covered by a catch all disclaimer that is almost lawsuit proof and paid out close to a half billion dollars that AppleInsider then blew off as insignificant. They couldn’t hold off the EU regulations and also just got hit with a 1.84B Euro fine. Their brilliant legal minds also sued a tiny company with a pear logo and ended up having to help redesign their logo given the public blowback. They lost the Apple Watch case and settled with Qualcomm. This is their top notch legal team that they are bringing to this fight?fastasleep said:
If only Apple had a few actual lawyers and stuff.bulk001 said:Only time will tell if you are right. Why don’t you reschedule this post for an update in 2 years. Personally my money is on the DOJ who, you know has actual lawyers and stuff, as opposed to two writers of an Apple blog. -
Apple will crush the DoJ in court if Garland sticks with outdated arguments
The problem is that Jim Cramer agrees with you! (Sorry, insider investor joke where you always do the opposite of what Cramer recommends)Kuminga said:This is a great article.
I read through the complaint because I work for an investment firm and had to do it as soon as it came out.
i have to say, this complaint is simply filled with pure idiocy and outdated claims, I am not a lawyer but it’s hard to see how the DOJ can prevail here.
This complaint is a perfect example and great argument for small government and how stupid and outdated these people are quite honestly.
The 5 percent stock loss today is a buying opportunity.
