Cellular phone questions/advice...

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 36
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    I am staunchy anti-cell phone but even a traditionalist like me must look to the future. I am increasingly weary of paying $40+ a month for a landline only to have long distance charges ADDED TO that. Rediculous. And it's stuck at my apartment instead of to my ass, where it would be most useful.



    But I just know at some point I'd use it while driving and I'd have to cry for days at the person I'd become. Oh cruel fate!



    JohnKentucky had a problem of not being able to order pizza because he didn't have a proper "home phone"...



    On the solicitor tip, are they just not allowed to call cell phones or do they just not as an "ethical" rule (if telemarketers actually have ethics).
  • Reply 22 of 36
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    Your situation is very similiar to mine, 'rat.



    I've always hated the notion and have never desired one whatsover in all this time. But now that my Internet access is in no way tied to a phone line AND the fact that I don't talk very much, but do get out a bit and would like - for reasons of security and convenience - have a good phone with me, I've started to reconsider.



    Honestly, during the day, while at work, I'll probably have it off and just let the voice mail get it...just as I currently do on my real, landline phone.



    I don't want to be one of those people who has one glued to their ear everytime you see them. I don't even like enough people to do that.







    Seriously, during the day, people call me at work. In the evenings, if I see a number that looks familiar or that I want to talk to, then I answer.



    Other than that, for directions, emergencies, calling ahead to notify someone if I'm lost or running late, checking movie start times, etc., it would be with me in the car.



    And no...I would NOT be one of those assholes who let it ring during movies and so forth. I have manners.



    My life wouldn't change, really. Just knowing it's there - as much as I tend to be out and about - would be a nice thing to have.



    I think...



    <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
  • Reply 23 of 36
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    Oh yeah, regarding Caller ID: actually, the number thing would probably suffice. I know all the home, personal, cell and work numbers of anyone I'd want calling me, and would answer accordingly.



    Any number I didn't recognize, I'll either take a chance or leave it for voice mail and check later.



    I probably don't really need to see anyone's name if I know the numbers. I didn't know that part came built-in. That's cool.
  • Reply 24 of 36
    'Scates-



    Here's the deal with caller ID... when you program numbers into speed-dial/your phone book, and one of them calls you, it shows up as their name and number. Other numbers are just the number.



    So, say you programmed my number, 123-555-3456, into your phonebook as "Jonathan"



    When I call, it'll show



    Incoming Call

    Jonathan

    123-555-3456
  • Reply 25 of 36
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by Jonathan:

    <strong>'Scates-



    Here's the deal with caller ID... when you program numbers into speed-dial/your phone book, and one of them calls you, it shows up as their name and number. Other numbers are just the number.



    So, say you programmed my number, 123-555-3456, into your phonebook as "Jonathan"



    When I call, it'll show



    Incoming Call

    Jonathan

    123-555-3456</strong><hr></blockquote>



    With my phone it just says the name if it's in the phonebook. It doesn't show the number unless it's not in the phonebook.
  • Reply 26 of 36
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    Why do you, at 14, have a cellular phone?
  • Reply 27 of 36
    a10t2a10t2 Posts: 191member
    [quote]Originally posted by groverat:

    <strong>Why do you, at 14, have a cellular phone?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    The same reason anyone else would... to make or receive calls without being on a landline.



    BTW: I had my first at 15.
  • Reply 28 of 36
    Mine's for drug dealing



    Parents get them to find where their kids are.
  • Reply 29 of 36
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    I think the only reason I would possibly allow a cell phone for the kid would be to limit the possible outgoing numbers to 911, my phone and the mother's.



    What's next? Credit cards at 13? (Please God don't answer that with a 'yes')
  • Reply 30 of 36
    newnew Posts: 3,244member
    hey! just had to comment on this, Scandinavia, where I live, (maybe in additon to japan) is currently the place on earth where the most people have cellurlars... And EVERY 13 year old has one. My younger sister is 11 and just got her first. You might find this strange, but your all gonna be there in a while. My sister, by the way, almost only use her phone for SMS messaging, its a nokia ofcourse - so she sends me a lot of cute cartoon pictures while i'm in the midle of important meetings...



    The 7650 with Symbian OS, MMS (MulimediaMessenging), Built in camera, GPRS, java and colorscreen brings us almost up too par with the coolest japanese phones, too bad you will have too wait a while for the US version. this phone really kicks the handspring Treos ass, and I think Steve Jobs is so right about the Palm/PocketPC market right now. The Nokia 9210 outsold both PALM and iPAQ together in Europe last quarter.

  • Reply 31 of 36
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by a10t2:

    <strong>



    The same reason anyone else would... to make or receive calls without being on a landline.

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Exactly.
  • Reply 32 of 36
    tmptmp Posts: 601member
    I would say go with Verizon. I had Cingular when it was PacBell and it was pretty spotty coverage in LA. Sprint was worse. My company uses AT&T which is also pretty bad. You should be able to get a tri-mode phone from them pretty cheap. You can sign up for a national plan with free long distance, 150 minutes and no roaming for about what you would be paying for a land line. You can get a nokia for $60 on that plan, although I prefer Motorola. You can get a star-tac for a hundred. (I used to have that one, it fit in my pocket, and I liked that when folded the keys and screen won't be screwed with)
  • Reply 33 of 36
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    Sometimes I feel, at 20 years old, I'm from a completely different era than people even 2-3 years younger than me.
  • Reply 34 of 36
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    I agree with tmp . Some people I know have Verizon and it's better than VoiceStream (what I have) and it also seems better than AT&T.



    [ 11-28-2001: Message edited by: EmAn ]</p>
  • Reply 35 of 36
    amoryaamorya Posts: 1,103member
    [quote]Originally posted by groverat:

    <strong>I think the only reason I would possibly allow a cell phone for the kid would be to limit the possible outgoing numbers to 911, my phone and the mother's.



    What's next? Credit cards at 13? (Please God don't answer that with a 'yes')</strong><hr></blockquote>



    You obviously don't live in UK... nearly every kid from age 13 upwards has a mobile phone. SMS messaging is the most common way to communicate (shouts of "I'll text you later", etc, can be heard in high schools round the country).



    Amorya



  • Reply 36 of 36
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by Amorya:

    <strong>



    You obviously don't live in UK... nearly every kid from age 13 upwards has a mobile phone. SMS messaging is the most common way to communicate (shouts of "I'll text you later", etc, can be heard in high schools round the country).



    Amorya



    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    That's what it's starting to sound like here too, well at least in my school.
Sign In or Register to comment.