AT&T brings lawsuit against Verizon over "Map" ad campaign

245

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 95
    quadra 610quadra 610 Posts: 6,757member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by noexpectations View Post


    Yeah, I know it?s easy to bash AT&T for a number of recent issues. However, remember that AT&T supports far more smart phones than any other US based carrier. Network upgrades take time, money, equipment, and advanced engineering. I?m not an apologist; I realize, too, that AT&T should have planned better.



    As for all the recent comments about how AT&T could not survive without Apple, I recently ran across this website that show cased all of the accomplishments and inventions by AT&T over the last 130 years. (I was researching the origins of the cell phone for a project that I am working on.) It?s quite impressive.



    http://www.corp.att.com/attlabs/reputation/timeline/



    Some highlights:



    1876: The first telephone.

    1924: The first Electrical Sound Recordings.

    1926: The first Sound in Motion Pictures.

    1939: The first Digital Computer.

    1946: The first Mobile Call.

    1947: The first Transistor. This was one of the biggest inventions of the 20th century. This is the foundation of every single electronics device.

    1954: The first (usable) modern Solar Cell.

    1960: The first Communications Satellites.

    1969: UNIX and the foundation of the Internet.

    1969 The CCD (Charge-Coupled Device that transfers light into electric signals) Every one of the digital images you ? and millions of others ? take every day is made possible thanks to work done by two Bell Labs researchers in the late 1960s. Their ground-breaking work was recently recognized with the Nobel Prize in Physics.

    1983: Cell Phones and the Cell Phone Network.

    1983: C (1972) and C++. You may not know this, but just about every digital device runs some form of C++ generated code.

    1989: HDTV Technology?..and first demonstration to the FCC.

    1997: a2b secure digital transmission of Music (compression, authorization). This cleared the way for online music resellers to distribute digital music over the Internet.



    There are plenty more out there?..these are just a few as they relate to Apple.



    So, yes AT&T is benefitting from Apple?s iPhone??but I would argue that Apple has also benefitted from AT&T?s accomplishments as well. AT&T has invented many of the critical components that are at the core of the most popular products that Apple sells today.



    Apple?s strength is the ability to integrate and enhance previously developed technologies into desirable consumer products. Here are some examples:



    Mac OS X: The foundation of this OS is UNIX??UNIX was created by AT&T.



    iPod/iTunes: AT&T developed stereo recordings, compression, secure digital transfers, C++, and of course the transistor. The latest iPods now have CCDs (picture/video)?all developed by AT&T.



    iPhone: AT&T invented the Cell Phone Network. Apple?s recent growth (iPhone) is reliant upon this technology that AT&T invented.



    So, yes, AT&T is benefiting from the iPhone?.but Apple has also benefitted from AT&T?s inventions as well.



    I am offering this to inspire intelligent discussion, debate, and comments.



    I stand corrected. They're boring, but . . . accomplished.
  • Reply 22 of 95
    teckstudteckstud Posts: 6,476member
    Where's AT&T's tethering? Is there a lawsuit for that?
  • Reply 23 of 95
    I understood the commercial the 1st time around. I have a 3G iPhone but in our area we don't get 3G and we don't stand a chance in heck to get it unless AT&T gets their head out of their butt and upgrades the system. No 3G, but I still have to pay for it. A.T.& T. gave me a one-time rebate because of the poor service, but nothing on going.... A "sort-of" acknowledgement that their system in this area is inadequate. AT&T needs to not pay lawyers,but put their money in upgrading the system. This lawsuit only highlights what an embarassment AT&T's 3G system truly is at this point in time and I really don't think that the invention of the phone can be used as a credit to this particular company after it being broken up and then re-invented because they deregulated the whole business.
  • Reply 24 of 95
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by hill60 View Post


    I wonder if anyone will take the Droid multitasking statement to task.



    No simultaneous voice and data = no multitasking like the iPhone is capable of.



    Oh, the irony of all ironies.
  • Reply 25 of 95
    anonymouseanonymouse Posts: 6,975member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by noexpectations View Post


    [...]

    As for all the recent comments about how AT&T could not survive without Apple, I recently ran across this website that show cased all of the accomplishments and inventions by AT&T over the last 130 years. [...]



    That would be one impressive list of accomplishments, but the current AT&T isn't the company that did those things. Today's AT&T is SBC renamed, not the AT&T that invented UNIX.
  • Reply 26 of 95
    ericblrericblr Posts: 172member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by hill60 View Post


    I wonder if anyone will take the Droid multitasking statement to task.



    No simultaneous voice and data = no multitasking like the iPhone is capable of.



    Really???? Hmmmm, I have a G1 with Tmobile, and I use data apps all the time while talking on the phone. I think you've gotten some bad info.
  • Reply 27 of 95
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by noexpectations View Post


    Yeah, I know it?s easy to bash AT&T for a number of recent issues. ..... I recently ran across this website that show cased all of the accomplishments and inventions by AT&T over the last 130 years. .....

    I am offering this to inspire intelligent discussion, debate, and comments.



    Excellent list. Most of it, if I am not mistaken, was from Bell Labs, which used to be a division of ATT. (I think they were responsible for the invention of the laser too.) Unfortunately, however, ATT also gutted Bell Labs over the years.



    It also says something about how the innovative greatness that was once the hallmark of the American companies has now been reduced to fighting over scraps of competing ads and tiny market share gains from borrowed technology. No major company - not Microsoft, not Intel, not Cisco, not Apple - seems to to be doing that type of path-breaking, world-changing research anymore.
  • Reply 28 of 95
    brucepbrucep Posts: 2,823member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by PaulMJohnson View Post


    I have to admit, I rather like the "there's a map for that" ad's.



    I've no idea if they are true, but I think it's a smart idea.



    yea its a great iphone ad

    all i think of is the app store maps
  • Reply 29 of 95
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ericblr View Post


    Really???? Hmmmm, I have a G1 with Tmobile, and I use data apps all the time while talking on the phone. I think you've gotten some bad info.



    Your Andriod phone runs on UMTS which supports simultaneous voice and data. Verizon's Android phones will not support this (nor will any of AT&T or T-Mobile's phones when used outside of a 3G coverage area; EDGE/GPRS [2.5/2g] do not support simultaneous use of voice and data either).
  • Reply 30 of 95
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member
    T-mobile is GSM, weird 1700Mhz GSM that no-one else on earth uses but GSM nonetheless, hence capable of simultaneous voice/data transmissions to donuts or cupcakes.



    Has T-Mobile also licensed the use of the name "Droid" from LucasArts and are they using it in an extensive advertising campaign involving a specific Motorola CDMA handset?



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ericblr View Post


    Really???? Hmmmm, I have a G1 with Tmobile, and I use data apps all the time while talking on the phone. I think you've gotten some bad info.



  • Reply 31 of 95
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by anonymouse View Post


    That would be one impressive list of accomplishments, but the current AT&T isn't the company that did those things. Today's AT&T is SBC renamed, not the AT&T that invented UNIX.



    Quite true. But, in fairness, SBC used to be a part of the original ATT that did all this with its Bell Labs division.
  • Reply 32 of 95
    jeffdmjeffdm Posts: 12,953member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by skittlebrau79 View Post


    It depends if AT&T's study is accurate. According to the article, more than 50% people surveyed thought that the white areas meant there was no coverage at all. I made the same mistake the first time I saw the commercial but since I've seen it a million times since, I got what they meant.



    I don't think that's a problem. I saw the notice and I only saw the ad once. So I really have little sympathy for AT&T's argument. There's a certain point that I really can't just excuse the audience's unwillingness to pay attention or investigate the facts for themselves.
  • Reply 33 of 95
    solipsismsolipsism Posts: 25,726member
    edit: pipped by everyone.
  • Reply 34 of 95
    brucepbrucep Posts: 2,823member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by noexpectations View Post


    Yeah, I know it?s easy to bash AT&T for a number of recent issues. However, remember that AT&T supports far more smart phones than any other US based carrier. Network upgrades take time, money, equipment, and advanced engineering. I?m not an apologist; I realize, too, that AT&T should have planned better.



    As for all the recent comments about how AT&T could not survive without Apple, I recently ran across this website that show cased all of the accomplishments and inventions by AT&T over the last 130 years. (I was researching the origins of the cell phone for a project that I am working on.) It?s quite impressive.



    http://www.corp.att.com/attlabs/reputation/timeline/



    Some highlights:



    1876: The first telephone.

    1924: The first Electrical Sound Recordings.

    1926: The first Sound in Motion Pictures.

    1939: The first Digital Computer.

    1946: The first Mobile Call.

    1947: The first Transistor. This was one of the biggest inventions of the 20th century. This is the foundation of every single electronics device.

    1954: The first (usable) modern Solar Cell.

    1960: The first Communications Satellites.

    1969: UNIX and the foundation of the Internet.

    1969 The CCD (Charge-Coupled Device that transfers light into electric signals) Every one of the digital images you ? and millions of others ? take every day is made possible thanks to work done by two Bell Labs researchers in the late 1960s. Their ground-breaking work was recently recognized with the Nobel Prize in Physics.

    1983: Cell Phones and the Cell Phone Network.

    1983: C (1972) and C++. You may not know this, but just about every digital device runs some form of C++ generated code.

    1989: HDTV Technology?..and first demonstration to the FCC.

    1997: a2b secure digital transmission of Music (compression, authorization). This cleared the way for online music resellers to distribute digital music over the Internet.



    There are plenty more out there?..these are just a few as they relate to Apple.



    So, yes AT&T is benefitting from Apple?s iPhone??but I would argue that Apple has also benefitted from AT&T?s accomplishments as well. AT&T has invented many of the critical components that are at the core of the most popular products that Apple sells today.



    Apple?s strength is the ability to integrate and enhance previously developed technologies into desirable consumer products. Here are some examples:



    Mac OS X: The foundation of this OS is UNIX??UNIX was created by AT&T.



    iPod/iTunes: AT&T developed stereo recordings, compression, secure digital transfers, C++, and of course the transistor. The latest iPods now have CCDs (picture/video)?all developed by AT&T.



    iPhone: AT&T invented the Cell Phone Network. Apple?s recent growth (iPhone) is reliant upon this technology that AT&T invented.



    So, yes, AT&T is benefiting from the iPhone?.but Apple has also benefitted from AT&T?s inventions as well.



    I am offering this to inspire intelligent discussion, debate, and comments.



    sadly the ATT you speak of went cold all ties broken dead about 5 years ago



    THERE IS NO connection betwixt the old att and the new att

    none

    great history

    i love your timeline

    my son whose 9 will read this and we will discuss some things we find from it

    so thank you dude



    peace 9
  • Reply 35 of 95
    brucepbrucep Posts: 2,823member
    So, yes, AT&T is benefiting from the iPhone?.but Apple has also benefitted from AT&T?s inventions as well.



    I am offering this to inspire intelligent discussion, debate, and comments.[/QUOTE]



    A great part of ma bell was bell labs whom invented all the stuff you speak of and tons more

    as a child i watched each new invention bell labs made with great interest . There will never be a bell lab again

    sad i am to say this .

    back then AN ATT made phone lasted 20 YRS
  • Reply 36 of 95
    wigginwiggin Posts: 2,265member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by skittlebrau79 View Post


    It depends if AT&T's study is accurate. According to the article, more than 50% people surveyed thought that the white areas meant there was no coverage at all. I made the same mistake the first time I saw the commercial but since I've seen it a million times since, I got what they meant.



    Their survey results are meaningless unless you know who, where, and how they conducted their survey. You can basically get any results you want by simply asking the questions in the right way. For example, "Verizon's commercial shows a map of ATT coverage area that shows no coverage in large areas of the US. Will you have service in those areas?" A survey constructed in the right way can be far more misleading than Verizon's commercial.
  • Reply 37 of 95
    brucepbrucep Posts: 2,823member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by solipsism View Post


    edit: pipped by everyone.



    and every one is pipped by you!!
  • Reply 38 of 95
    jeffdmjeffdm Posts: 12,953member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post


    Quite true. But, in fairness, SBC used to be a part of the original ATT that did all this with its Bell Labs division.



    I would suggest that the intellectual heritage is gone, and so is Bell Labs, they've been spun off about a decade ago, and squandered too.
  • Reply 39 of 95
    anonymouseanonymouse Posts: 6,975member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by anantksundaram View Post


    Quite true. But, in fairness, SBC used to be a part of the original ATT that did all this with its Bell Labs division.



    Yes, but not a part that had anything to do with Bell Labs. SBC, today's AT&T, had essentially nothing to do with any of the things Bell Labs accomplished.
  • Reply 40 of 95
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by JeffDM View Post


    I would suggest that the intellectual heritage is gone, and so is Bell Labs, they've been spun off about a decade ago, and squandered too.



    See post #28, above.
Sign In or Register to comment.