It's a great thing to disagree about, because it can't be proved either way (Unless there's a second coming, or something). I can't prove he didn't exist, you can't prove he did.
Of course, if we were arguing the existence of the G5, I'd be beating you repeatedly round the head until you bleed.
Oh, wait, that growing up thing...</strong><hr></blockquote>
The G5 is real, but not this month.
Hey look, our post count is Identical! Oh shoot! Not anymore...
There is a good article in the recent Harper's about how recent archeological finds are running very opposed to Biblical versions of history. Not so much n the 'new' Testement, but rather, in the Hebrew Bible.
Comments
<strong>
It's a great thing to disagree about, because it can't be proved either way (Unless there's a second coming, or something). I can't prove he didn't exist, you can't prove he did.
Of course, if we were arguing the existence of the G5, I'd be beating you repeatedly round the head until you bleed.
Oh, wait, that growing up thing...</strong><hr></blockquote>
The G5 is real, but not this month.
Hey look, our post count is Identical! Oh shoot! Not anymore...