Where Do You Get Your Cable News?
Besides the New York Times, I generally turn to CNN. While they might not be the quickest to get to breaking news they seem very reliable. Probably the only reason I don't watch MSNBC is because of the MS (or should I say BS) part of the station. Lastly I turn to Fox news for some comic relief. With a lineup of Bill O'Riely and Hannity and Comes, their conservative views either send me away laughing or pissed off. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
Comments
oh you mean real news?
CNN if I ever really need to, other than that I watch local news
<strong>Fox News Channel, usually. Partially because they are a bit more conservative, but also because they seem a lot more "on the ball" about breaking news/covering as much as possible.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Same here...although some of the things they call news "alerts" really aren't--does Bush getting off of Marine One or the daily Pentagon breifing really onstitute an alert?
BTW, "Ugliest newscaster in history" goes out to FOX's Catherine Herridge, while "most annoying" goes to Linda Vester. "Cutest" goes to Kiran Chetry
Yesterday, I was flipping around, and they were talking about 'Patriotic Vacations'. Not that the subject was a problem, but they were talking about the ALAMO! What the heck?
How visiting is the Alamo a patriotic American vacation? A patriotic vacation would be visiting the freedom trail in Boston, or going to Lexington or Concord. A patriotic vacation would be visiting battle sites of the Civil War or visiting Washington D.C. A patriotic vacation would not be to visit a site that made Texas an independent country.
Sure, some Americans were involved in the battle, but history has shown that many who fought at the Alamo who were Americans wanted either to have Texas as an independent country, or as slave state. Many people wanted to build Plantations on the Gulf of Mexico on cheap land they would get if Texas was a state or independent country.
Sure, Texas joined the US, but even they didn't care about the Alamo, as they tried to have it torn down on many ocassions. It was finally a private organization that saved it, but if it had been up to the state of Texas, it would have been demolished.
It's things like this that Fox does that irks me.
CNN
CNN Headline news
Fox News...
------------------------------------
© FERRO 2001-2002
And I usually find myself stopping by MSNBC a few hundred times a day to see if Ashleigh Banfield is on.
But overall, I'm a Fox guy. Sorry.
No other station will ever report something and then tell you they're not quite sure about certain details - that's bad journalism and bad technique. If something's an ify proposition, report it, but let the people know it's not a certainty. Only ABC does that with any regularity.
As far as general TV news sources, I've said it a hundred times - only one show gives in-depth coverage, as well as insights and details from both sides of a given story - The News Hour. Sure, Jim Lehrer is not exciting and PBS doesn't have a million fancy graphics and sound-bites to woo our 3.2 second attention spans, but they do what news is supposed to do - educate people on the issues they might otherwise not have access to.
To put any other news show in the same category is to delude oneself. Truth hurts. Our media people are ratings whores through and through, so don't go away from your favorite network newscast thinking you got the facts straight, because chances are they forgot to mention something relevant...something you'd be better off knowing about.
[ 02-21-2002: Message edited by: Moogs ? ]</p>
It's about 60% hard news, 10% education, 10% topical fluff, and 20% spin doctors.
<strong>You know when I read the BBC on line I find a great deal of bias and slanted reporting. I don't know why people think it's some great objective source for real news?</strong><hr></blockquote>
At least their priorities aren´t ****ed up. The last month I have found several examples where things I find very newsworthy (as in meeting classic criterias for news) isn´t reported on CNN. I have given some of the examples here in the forum.
I dare anyone who think CNN or Fox is all that to do the opposite of what I did: Try find news on their homepage that you can´t find or isn´t fairly represented on BBC. Its not because I don´t think you can but I would like to be proven if its just me that are too blind.
I don´t have a tv but when I see news elsewhere its our equiliant to BBC, BBC and once in a while CNN and for entertainment FOX
[ 02-21-2002: Message edited by: Anders ]</p>
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_1832000/1832372.stm" target="_blank">Palestinian militants 'change tactics</a>
<strong>Look at this news at the BBC. I almost get the feeling that the BBC is trying to give the PA pointers on how to attack Isreal and improve it's image.
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_1832000/1832372.stm" target="_blank">Palestinian militants 'change tactics</a></strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />