One of the major questions here is how similar WebKit2s implementation is to Chrome's. The official announcement isn't very detailed on that. I've recently read, that several people of the Chrome project are working on WebKit. So, was this only Apple's idea, or did Google contribute. This would indeed be interesting.
One of the major questions here is how similar WebKit2s implementation is to Chrome's. The official announcement isn't very detailed on that. I've recently read, that several people of the Chrome project are working on WebKit. So, was this only Apple's idea, or did Google contribute. This would indeed be interesting.
Must be a patent here somewhere for someone to sue someone for
Does seem like that is true. Yet, I am unsure why. I have used Firefox and Chrome. Firefox is a more stable browser that is far more customizable. Chrome's in Beta and it shows especially in some Java sites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody
It seems like Chrome on the Mac is the new Firefox (the "anti-Safari" web browser of choice), and that Firefox is on the way out unless it can change.
The sad part is that the things that Mozilla needs to change most (WebKit and support for codecs besides Ogg Theora), aren't going to happen any time soon. They will have to lose a lot more market share before they realise the stupidity of those moves.
Good news yes, but so was Female Emancipation - about bleedin' time!
I am amazed that this situation has been allowed to go on so long. Countless times I have had a tab busy trying to FIND stuff to download and been unable to flip to another tab or scroll it in anything like a rational way.
So looking forward to Webkit entering the 1980's in this regard. Maybe this is what comes from using architects who have only known desktops.
Does seem like that is true. Yet, I am unsure why. I have used Firefox and Chrome. Firefox is a more stable browser that is far more customizable. Chrome's in Beta and it shows especially in some Java sites.
I love FF. Fast enough. The address bar is awesome. Never have to use bookmarks again.
Comments
One of the major questions here is how similar WebKit2s implementation is to Chrome's. The official announcement isn't very detailed on that. I've recently read, that several people of the Chrome project are working on WebKit. So, was this only Apple's idea, or did Google contribute. This would indeed be interesting.
Must be a patent here somewhere for someone to sue someone for
It seems like Chrome on the Mac is the new Firefox (the "anti-Safari" web browser of choice), and that Firefox is on the way out unless it can change.
The sad part is that the things that Mozilla needs to change most (WebKit and support for codecs besides Ogg Theora), aren't going to happen any time soon. They will have to lose a lot more market share before they realise the stupidity of those moves.
Good news yes, but so was Female Emancipation - about bleedin' time!
I am amazed that this situation has been allowed to go on so long. Countless times I have had a tab busy trying to FIND stuff to download and been unable to flip to another tab or scroll it in anything like a rational way.
So looking forward to Webkit entering the 1980's in this regard. Maybe this is what comes from using architects who have only known desktops.
Do what now?
Does seem like that is true. Yet, I am unsure why. I have used Firefox and Chrome. Firefox is a more stable browser that is far more customizable. Chrome's in Beta and it shows especially in some Java sites.
I love FF. Fast enough. The address bar is awesome. Never have to use bookmarks again.