There is evidence that not all of the them were submitted before he was hired. I don't think anyone has said they shouldn't have hired him. Just seems odd to have someone with a public interest in porn and off colour apps be put charge of protecting our freedom from those same things.
With regard to censorship, The Apple Community has no freedom of speech.
If you are referring to Apple, Inc. it is company. Of course they don't allow total freedom of speech. If you are an employee and don't like that fact, go work elsewhere.
Quote:
People really should be able to put whatever they want on their iToys, and apps should not have to exclusively funnel through the Apple iTunes Apps Store.
People can put whatever they want on their iToys.
Apple does not have to provide a way to do it though.
So these apps do not violate App Store policies. They are guilty of poor taste, low value, and low utility and being associated with the director of the App Store. Is that a scandal?
...I see from the most recent articles on giz that he also was following at least 16 escorts and porn stars on twitter. ...
Quote:
The game Animal Farts features various cartoon images of animals with their buttocks facing forward, giving users buttons to trigger "Fart," "Poot," "Drop" or "Wiz" sounds accompanied with animations illustrating said emissions.
Look, a company can hire and associate with anyone they want. Question is, should a company, or should _I_, be more proud of a fella with the credentials above, or with someone who'd created something imaginative and constructive--there are thousands of apps like that on the app store.
I think it's embarrassing for apple. If this were about a key microsoft exec people here would be frantic as they had a field day with it.
People really should be able to put whatever they want on their iToys, and apps should not have to exclusively funnel through the Apple iTunes Apps Store.
Two things:
1) Apple can't tell me what apps to install on my phone
2) I can't tell Apple what to sell on its store.
A lot of the apps I run come from places other than Apple's app store, like flash for example.
This is really a time when I DON'T need an app for that.
With regard to censorship, The Apple Community has no freedom of speech.
People really should be able to put whatever they want on their iToys, and apps should not have to exclusively funnel through the Apple iTunes Apps Store.
Ah, I see the "Waah" fairy has arrived, and just in time.
I would imagine that Jobs is not pleased. This is a key Apple executive who is responsible for making sure that iApps do not violate Apple's high standards. From the description and screen shots, this app is crude, vulgar, and reflects a serious lack of maturity.
So these apps do not violate App Store policies. They are guilty of poor taste, low value, and low utility and being associated with the director of the App Store. Is that a scandal?
It's not a scandal, it is funny. It would be like putting Larry Flynt as the head of the FCC board in charge of censoring American TV broadcasts. Actually, probably a good thing in terms of loosening them up, but it is ironic to put a guy with that background in charge of the decency police.
I'd rather someone with real world experience was in charge of this process than some inexperienced prudes.
Nothing to read here, move along.
Must be a very slow news day.
Except he is in charge of enforcing very prudish content rules. Which is fine. But it is pretty asinine to assert that his personal interesting in porn, escorts, piss and farts somehow makes him better at determining what is appropriate. What, are you saying that because he follows escorts and porn stars he can tell an appropriate nipple from an inappropriate nipple better than someone else? Does his experience with fart apps make him better able to judge a high quality fart app from the crappy ones? His experience as a developer and director might make him a good choice, but to try and claim his personal interests or the type of juvenile apps he created make him a better censor is pretty lame.
No one said this was a bad thing. It is humorous. You know, fox in the hen house and that sort of thing.
I surprised no one has jumped on the conflict of interest issue.
Person writes iPhone app.
Person makes $$$ (or prestige or gets some sort of benefit) from iPhone app.
Person is now put in charge of approving or disapproving other apps written by other people that may compete with his app(s).
The second Shoemaker was hired by Apple, any app he had anything to do with should have been pulled from the App store. He currently has a personal financial incentive to disapprove apps that compete with his existing apps.
Comments
There is evidence that not all of the them were submitted before he was hired. I don't think anyone has said they shouldn't have hired him. Just seems odd to have someone with a public interest in porn and off colour apps be put charge of protecting our freedom from those same things.
He was just doing research
With regard to censorship, The Apple Community has no freedom of speech.
If you are referring to Apple, Inc. it is company. Of course they don't allow total freedom of speech. If you are an employee and don't like that fact, go work elsewhere.
People really should be able to put whatever they want on their iToys, and apps should not have to exclusively funnel through the Apple iTunes Apps Store.
People can put whatever they want on their iToys.
Apple does not have to provide a way to do it though.
That's the best out there? This silliness?
Wow.
Anything for a laugh.
Nothing more to be said.
(well, maybe I should say, that's a sweet in the ground toilet....)
...I see from the most recent articles on giz that he also was following at least 16 escorts and porn stars on twitter. ...
The game Animal Farts features various cartoon images of animals with their buttocks facing forward, giving users buttons to trigger "Fart," "Poot," "Drop" or "Wiz" sounds accompanied with animations illustrating said emissions.
Look, a company can hire and associate with anyone they want. Question is, should a company, or should _I_, be more proud of a fella with the credentials above, or with someone who'd created something imaginative and constructive--there are thousands of apps like that on the app store.
I think it's embarrassing for apple. If this were about a key microsoft exec people here would be frantic as they had a field day with it.
I think it's embarrassing for apple. If this were about a key microsoft exec people here would be frantic as they had a field day with it.
Wonder if he wrote these apps when Steve was away....
People really should be able to put whatever they want on their iToys, and apps should not have to exclusively funnel through the Apple iTunes Apps Store.
Two things:
1) Apple can't tell me what apps to install on my phone
2) I can't tell Apple what to sell on its store.
A lot of the apps I run come from places other than Apple's app store, like flash for example.
This is really a time when I DON'T need an app for that.
With regard to censorship, The Apple Community has no freedom of speech.
People really should be able to put whatever they want on their iToys, and apps should not have to exclusively funnel through the Apple iTunes Apps Store.
Ah, I see the "Waah" fairy has arrived, and just in time.
That would be a real scandal!
So these apps do not violate App Store policies. They are guilty of poor taste, low value, and low utility and being associated with the director of the App Store. Is that a scandal?
It's not a scandal, it is funny. It would be like putting Larry Flynt as the head of the FCC board in charge of censoring American TV broadcasts. Actually, probably a good thing in terms of loosening them up, but it is ironic to put a guy with that background in charge of the decency police.
I'd rather someone with real world experience was in charge of this process than some inexperienced prudes.
Nothing to read here, move along.
Must be a very slow news day.
Except he is in charge of enforcing very prudish content rules. Which is fine. But it is pretty asinine to assert that his personal interesting in porn, escorts, piss and farts somehow makes him better at determining what is appropriate. What, are you saying that because he follows escorts and porn stars he can tell an appropriate nipple from an inappropriate nipple better than someone else? Does his experience with fart apps make him better able to judge a high quality fart app from the crappy ones? His experience as a developer and director might make him a good choice, but to try and claim his personal interests or the type of juvenile apps he created make him a better censor is pretty lame.
No one said this was a bad thing. It is humorous. You know, fox in the hen house and that sort of thing.
Person writes iPhone app.
Person makes $$$ (or prestige or gets some sort of benefit) from iPhone app.
Person is now put in charge of approving or disapproving other apps written by other people that may compete with his app(s).
The second Shoemaker was hired by Apple, any app he had anything to do with should have been pulled from the App store. He currently has a personal financial incentive to disapprove apps that compete with his existing apps.
- Jasen.