Wall Street views new Apple TV as small step, not living room revolution

Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited January 2014
While the new Apple TV was given the coveted "one more thing" slot in Steve Jobs' keynote Wednesday, the product will "continue to play second fiddle" to the iPods that were introduced, analysts on Wall Street believe.



Apple was busy at its media event on Wednesday, introducing a number of products including an updated iPod touch with Retina Display and forward-facing camera, dramatically redesigned iPod nano with multi-touch display, new iPod shuffle with buttons, and a cloud-centric $99 Apple TV. On the software side, the company also announced that iOS 4.1 is coming Sept. 8, iOS 4.2 will add wireless printing and AirPlay in November, and also released the new iTunes 10 with the Ping social music network.



By and large analysts on Wall Street came across pleased with Apple's new product lineup, which they think will be a strong seller this holiday season.



Needham Research



Analyst Charlie Wolf said he believes the highlight of the event was the iPod touch refresh, which added front and back cameras and a microphone to the portable media player, along with the A4 processor and Retina Display previously found in the iPhone 4.



He also noted that the price of the Apple TV was drastically reduced from $229 to $99, while TV rentals will now cost 99 cents. Despite these pricing changes, Wolf believes the Apple TV will remain a niche product among Apple's strong lineup.



"In our opinion, however, Apple TV will continue to play second fiddle to the iPod, iPhone and iPad," he wrote.



Wolf has maintained his price target of $375 for AAPL stock with a buy recommendation for investors.



Piper Jaffray



The new Apple TV is a "step in the right direction," analyst Gene Munster said. He has long believed that Apple will inevitably release a full-fledged connected HDTV set.



Munster believes Apple has been selling about 400,000 Apple TVs a year. He expects sales to nearly quadruple, to 1.5 million in fiscal year 2011, adding $50 million in revenue.



"We see the new Apple TV as a meaningful change in Apple's efforts in the digital living room," he wrote. "The addition of new content, such as Netflix, in combination with the $99 price (down from $299) will drive higher unit volumes compared to the previous version of Apple TV." However, he noted that the system is still "light on content."



Oppenheimer



Though the new Apple TV doesn't run App Store software like other A4-powered devices, analyst Yair Reiner sees the new product as strengthening the presence of iOS in the living room for another reason: AirPlay. Apple's upgraded wireless media streaming technology will allow users to stream videos and photos from their iPhone, iPad or iPod touch to an HDTV connected to the Apple TV.



"The new Apple TV, while unlikely to move Apple's bottom line much, is poised to provide iOS a growing foothold in the family room, a development that could open the door to further long-term opportunities while also boxing out wold-be rivals such as Google," Reiner wrote.



The analyst also said the iPod touch "graduated" from being a game and media device to a full-fledged social media service. And he believes Apple gave users the best reason to upgrade their iPod nano in years.



"Most of the cats had snuck out of Apple's bag in the weeks prior to today's iPod event, but that shouldn't obscure the bottom line: Apple has let loose some mighty cool cats," he wrote.



Gleacher & Company



Though the Apple TV is a "dramatic improvement from its 2006 origins," analyst Brian Marshall said, he's still waiting or a device that runs iOS and allows users to run applications in the living room. He does agree with Apple, though, that the future of content will be rentals instead of ownership.



Marshall heaped praise on Apple's new Ping social media service, which he believes could drive increased content purchases through the company's product ecosystem. Particularly, the 160 million active credit card users make a great starting point for the company's social networking initiative he said.



"While we were impressed with the iPod and Apple TV refreshes, in our view, Ping stole the show and represents AAPL's maiden voyage into the uber growth world of social networking," he said.



Still, Marshall thinks the single most important factor for Apple in the next 12 months is the international ramp of the iPhone. He also believes that 70 percent of the company's gross profits in calendar year 2011 will come from two products: the iPhone and the iPad.



Kaufman Bros.



Analyst Shaw Wu called the Apple TV announcement "underwhelming," and said that the new product will remain a "hobby" for the Cupertino, Calif., company. He said the product feels like a "work in progress" due to its limited features.



"The main capability we were hoping for was the ability to run apps from the iTunes App Store and it looks like AAPL decided to leave this out for now," he wrote.



But because the new device runs the same A4 processor as the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch, he said it "should be fairly easy" for the company to add the App Store to the new product in the future.



Wu also said he found the iTunes Ping social media service to be the "most intriguing" announcement Wednesday. He believes the addition will make iTunes even more successful by having it serve as a hub of interaction for people to connect with friends and recording artists.



"Today, users to go Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and MySpace to follow their favorite artists," Wu wrote. "With Ping, it is simply easier."
«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 86
    nkhmnkhm Posts: 928member
    Yup, Steve Jobs stated as much publicly within the last week. It's about small steps and working on studios to come round, while at the same time reducing the price point and building the user base to help convince the studios.



    Great repetition there, sorry - 'analysis'!



    Oh, and apple will NEVER release an integrated TV set. It blows away all of their models and the hope that customers upgrade their equipment at least once every 18 months - if a TV was available at £1000 + then it's a major purchase, and not one that has a reasonable upgrade cycle potential.
  • Reply 2 of 86
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post


    While the new Apple TV was given the coveted "one more thing" slot in Steve Jobs' keynote Wednesday, the product will "continue to play second fiddle" to the iPods that were introduced, analysts on Wall Street believe."



    Second fiddle? If anything, the iPod is second fiddle to the iPhone. Apple TV isn't even a member of the band. More like some guy sitting on the sidelines banging a tin can against the floor.
  • Reply 3 of 86
    Sure it's a small step. But at a hundred bucks, it also becomes an impulse buy. I suspect Apple at this time is more interested in shipping product than in breaking through any innovation barriers.



    That said, it's a decent product. Plug it into a TV and you've got a nice little media server. Nothing wrong with that.
  • Reply 4 of 86
    I'd love that new Apple TV if only it was usable in Europe (The Netherlands for me).

    Europe has too many countries and too many different goverments that all have their own saying on payments, rights etc that I will never be usable I am affraid.



    This new Apple TV would make me sell my HDD recorder.

    Only use it to record some shows on saturdaynight anyway.

    And channels here seem to stop shows after 10 episodes if they aren't watched enough properly. Meaning I have to download the rest.....
  • Reply 5 of 86
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by xSamplex View Post


    That said, it's a decent product. Plug it into a TV and you've got a nice little media server. .





    Does it handle common codecs? Or is it as limited as the iPad?
  • Reply 6 of 86
    What people seem to be missing is that the AppleTV is not -- and should not -- be a self-contained device. It's a way to add a big screen to any of your other iDevices without a cable. Why replace your existing iDevice? Just augment it.



    This is the best way to increase sales, rather than cannibalize.



    Watching movies over AirPlay is just the first step. HD gaming is the next step. Can't you see it? Tap a button to broadcast your game to a 42" big screen!



    Why do you think they called it Air*Play* ?



    Steve didn't announce it because no games can take advantage of it, yet. It's likely it's not quite ready, yet. There are lots of details around multi-player gaming, including screen hand-off, etc.
  • Reply 7 of 86
    matrix07matrix07 Posts: 1,993member
    All I want to say is there also should be Ping movie and Ping book.
  • Reply 8 of 86
    well this might be a small step , but its small step in right direction , would love to have hulu on it .

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by unscriptable View Post


    Why do you think they called it Air*Play* ?

    .



    well you can also "Play" music or a movie .
  • Reply 9 of 86
    malaxmalax Posts: 1,598member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by unscriptable View Post


    What people seem to be missing is that the AppleTV is not -- and should not -- be a self-contained device. It's a way to add a big screen to any of your other iDevices without a cable. Why replace your existing iDevice? Just augment it.



    This is the best way to increase sales, rather than cannibalize.



    Watching movies over AirPlay is just the first step. HD gaming is the next step. Can't you see it? Tap a button to broadcast your game to a 42" big screen!



    Why do you think they called it Air*Play* ?



    Steve didn't announce it because no games can take advantage of it, yet. It's likely it's not quite ready, yet. There are lots of details around multi-player gaming, including screen hand-off, etc.



    Good point.



    To me the $99 Apple TV is essentially an iPod/iPhone accessory. Thought of that way, it's an awesome deal.
  • Reply 10 of 86
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Newtron View Post


    Does it handle common codecs? Or is it as limited as the iPad?



    If you mean common codecs as used by ilegally downloaded files in mkv format, then no.

    Apple TV, and just about any other Apple product, is not meant for the power user imo.

    And therefore Apple will never support formats and codecs used by those power users.



    In a way this sucks, but if you use the Apple TV, and iTunes, in the way Apple advertises it to use you don't have a problem.
  • Reply 11 of 86
    matrix07matrix07 Posts: 1,993member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by xSamplex View Post


    Sure it's a small step. But at a hundred bucks, it also becomes an impulse buy. I suspect Apple at this time is more interested in shipping product than in breaking through any innovation barriers.



    That said, it's a decent product. Plug it into a TV and you've got a nice little media server. Nothing wrong with that.



    If there is audiophile-grad DAC that accept audio feed through HDMI (it's mostly USB presently) then this could be a perfect music player for audiophile. Think about it. Cool & quiet means almost non-existent jitter. Stream your lossless music from LAN, voila!

    $99? What a steal!
  • Reply 12 of 86
    Apple TV hopefully will go iOS next year. I think Apple is playing the waiting game and get most content providers on board before they go all out on AppleTV.
  • Reply 13 of 86
    It's a convenient box, but as long as Apple is married to 720p, their digital hub dream will remain a 'hobby.'



    1080p is the standard and has been so for several years.
  • Reply 14 of 86
    Wall St is wrong.



    This will be a hit - make no mistake.



    At this price loads of iPhone/iPad/iMac users will finally say - hell now it's worth switching over/spending a bit more and getting (a) an additional media player to their Sony PSX or just getting a media centre... just watch guys - money talks. :-)
  • Reply 15 of 86
    sheffsheff Posts: 1,407member
    I see it like this:

    If you want to pay for quality HD content, watch your favorite shows on you TV instead of you monitor, etc, Apple TV is awesome and a buy.



    If you want to watch for free from dubious sources or commercially supported like Hulu, then clearly Apple TV is not a buy.



    Since for most people cancelling cable is not an option, any additional settop box to pay for is simply an additional burden. Hence the lack of sucess for these boxes. Steve has explained this and understands this. Among the wealthier or techier crowd Apple is sure to be a hit but competition is not far behind. $99 price tag will surely help.



    If Boxee box launches I think I would rather get it, because it would allow me to get shows from hulu, netflix, Revision3, and many other sources like CBC, BBC, etc But you guys know about all this so am not gonna list out all the features. I am still looking to see what google will announce as well.
  • Reply 16 of 86
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleZilla View Post


    It's a convenient box, but as long as Apple is married to 720p, their digital hub dream will remain a 'hobby.'



    1080p is the standard and has been so for several years.



    Its not a standard on Virgin or Sky thats for sure. most of the stuff I get from them is SD and what is HD is mostly 720, and compressed to hell.



    The best HD picture I get is via Freesat BBC HD and thats a free one!
  • Reply 17 of 86
    Quote:

    Wall Street views new Apple TV as small step, not living room revolution



    I should sure as hell hope they do; it's exactly the same in functionality as the old Apple TV, except for the addition of Netflix streaming which nearly everyone already has available to them via a game console, blu-ray player or their television itself.
  • Reply 18 of 86
    nealgnealg Posts: 132member
    that Apple TV is more of an upgrade than a revolution. But it is a significant upgrade. From the broadcast(and maybe I misheard), it seems like Apple was just listening to what present AppleTV users were wanting from a new device and gave it to them. I wonder(and am guessing that they did go to others as well) if they went to people were thinking about Apple TV and asked what would it take for them to buy one. I am not sure if I will try out an Apple TV or not but if I do, I will probably get a netflix subscription with it to try to keep the costs somewhat more reasonable. I would probably only buy TV episodes of the shows that I like and missed an episode and not watch whole series. In those cases, it is more convenient, to me, to just buy the dvd set when they come out at the end of the season.



    I also agree that the big step on the iPod front was the iTouch getting the cameras although I also would have liked them to have given the option for a 3G connection, but maybe that will be saved for next year or for a smaller sized iPad. I actually think that the game center will be huge and will solidify the touch as a gaming device. This will be a great thing to push more games to come to iOS. The touch and the iPad will be the things to have this holiday season if everything works as expected.



    I like the new shuffle. I might pick another one up since I have not been able to find my second generation one. Not having the controls on the shuffle would have been a problem for me. The nano is the one piece of the whole puzzle that I am not sure of. It seems like that they made it a shuffle with a screen. I see that they did away with the camera which they probably didn't need anyway. I like the way they made it a clip on. But because they made it more shuffle like, I was thinking that maybe they should have made the introductory price at $99.



    Overall, I am pretty happy with what was introduced. I think the Apple TV, while not perfect, will sell fairly well but its main purpose is to cement iTunes position as the go to place for home entertainment. The touch, with the new advancements in iOs such as game center and airplay, will be a great way to share media and gaming and will allow the touch to keep on selling well and I think will make it the sought after handheld gaming device. The shuffle will continue along its niche and do ok. Just not sure where the nano will fit in and how well it will sell. It probably will do ok since it is now a clip on and will be easy to work out with and seems to be iOs based and could be for those that don't want all the functionality of the touch.



    One last point. I have seen some calls for Apple to buy Netflix. Don't think that will happen for 1 main reason. I don't think the studios will contract with an Apple owned Netflix. I feel they already think that Apple is too powerful and if they bought Netflix, I am sure some studios would do things that would put an Apple owned Netflix at a disadvantage.



    Neal
  • Reply 19 of 86
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by malax View Post


    Good point.



    To me the $99 Apple TV is essentially an iPod/iPhone accessory. Thought of that way, it's an awesome deal.



    I'd rather buy a $5 cable on eBay, plug it into the HT system, and crank the tunes or the video or whatever.





    $99 seems crazy for the uses you desire.
  • Reply 20 of 86
    Who cares what Wall Street thinks about Apple's new line-up? I am far more interested in what Consumers think.



    IMHO, the only true innovators and visionaries in the IT industry are Apple and Google. The rest are poseurs by comparison.



    I'm a twenty-five year Apple fan-boy because their products 'just work'. To be more specific, my entire personal and professional life is vertically integrated because all Apple products work well together. I amplify them with Google products, and I now have unparalleled power to live according to my own lights.



    There will always be nay-sayers (just witness the current American political malaise), but it is always easier to complain than to light the way. Apple continues to light the way.
Sign In or Register to comment.