Also, did Nokia announce they were adding the Windows PC OS to every phone? They certainly did not. They said they were just using the PHONE OS, so who cares if they uses a Mac for the video (which you can'r even prove)? Microsoft even makes Mac products! Use logic next time.
Pretty sure this video adheres to the licensing agreement. They are not separating the loops out from the video and distributing them standalone. Might want to re-think this article. (For the record I am not a Nokia sympathizer).
It seems nobody understands what a "music bed" is. It's when you use the music as background for something else, like a video or an ad. The question may be whether Nokia's video can be considered a commercial use of the music loop.
Of course you would need to weasel a full article out of this. Stupid move by Nokia, but even more stupid of you make an article of about it. You don't even understand that it doesn't violate ANY licensing agreement. And how do you know that they just didn't rip that Apple track and make the movie on a PC? That's right. You don't. Because you're a liar. You're just creating controversy as usual.
Maybe instead of trying to make up lies, posting about these concept phones by Nokia?
so apparently that makes you an idiot for wasting your time posting here...
It seems nobody understands what a "music bed" is. It's when you use the music as background for something else, like a video or an ad. The question may be whether Nokia's video can be considered a commercial use of the music loop.
Its irrelevant if nokia's video is commercial. the license has no restriction on commercial use of the music loop as a music bed for a video. only that you can't sell the loop standalone. thats why the article is just flat out wrong and days later its never been fixed because the author is a walking poster child for public education in south central LA.
This is some real fanboy crap. MS and Nokia have a deal on mobile products, it's not like Nokia pledged to be Microsoft's girlfriend. Just because they have a deal on mobile products does not mean that Nokia now has to ditch every Apple product in their organization.
Besides, how do you know they aren't running Windows on those machines?
Pretty sure this video adheres to the licensing agreement. They are not separating the loops out from the video and distributing them standalone. Might want to re-think this article. (For the record I am not a Nokia sympathizer).
The article didn't suggest Nokia broke the EULA, just that it's proven they used a Mac (technically they could have (and probably did) used FC and not iMovie since the iMovie loops would be available in FC as well.
The EULA basically just says you can't sell the loops, which is pretty obvious. Nothing to see here.
Pretty sure this video adheres to the licensing agreement. They are not separating the loops out from the video and distributing them standalone. Might want to re-think this article. (For the record I am not a Nokia sympathizer).
The article didn't suggest Nokia broke the EULA, just that it's proven they used a Mac. Technically they could have (and probably did) used FC and not iMovie since the iMovie loops would be available in FC as well.
The EULA basically just says you can't sell the loops, which is pretty obvious. Nothing to see here.
Comments
It's the best search engine out there that doesn't come from Google - so I use it.
It's really sad for Google that a Microsoft product is the more ethical choice.
Check out Duck Duck Go.
Pretty sure this video adheres to the licensing agreement. They are not separating the loops out from the video and distributing them standalone. Might want to re-think this article. (For the record I am not a Nokia sympathizer).
It seems nobody understands what a "music bed" is. It's when you use the music as background for something else, like a video or an ad. The question may be whether Nokia's video can be considered a commercial use of the music loop.
Of course you would need to weasel a full article out of this. Stupid move by Nokia, but even more stupid of you make an article of about it. You don't even understand that it doesn't violate ANY licensing agreement. And how do you know that they just didn't rip that Apple track and make the movie on a PC? That's right. You don't. Because you're a liar. You're just creating controversy as usual.
Maybe instead of trying to make up lies, posting about these concept phones by Nokia?
so apparently that makes you an idiot for wasting your time posting here...
It seems nobody understands what a "music bed" is. It's when you use the music as background for something else, like a video or an ad. The question may be whether Nokia's video can be considered a commercial use of the music loop.
Its irrelevant if nokia's video is commercial. the license has no restriction on commercial use of the music loop as a music bed for a video. only that you can't sell the loop standalone. thats why the article is just flat out wrong and days later its never been fixed because the author is a walking poster child for public education in south central LA.
Apple uses Microsoft Excel to announce Apple's quarter financial results:
http://images.apple.com/pr/pdf/q111data_sum.pdf
Just because Apple's Numbers so stupid and useless tool even for such a simple document
[apple fanboy mode off]
Besides, how do you know they aren't running Windows on those machines?
Pretty sure this video adheres to the licensing agreement. They are not separating the loops out from the video and distributing them standalone. Might want to re-think this article. (For the record I am not a Nokia sympathizer).
The article didn't suggest Nokia broke the EULA, just that it's proven they used a Mac (technically they could have (and probably did) used FC and not iMovie since the iMovie loops would be available in FC as well.
The EULA basically just says you can't sell the loops, which is pretty obvious. Nothing to see here.
Pretty sure this video adheres to the licensing agreement. They are not separating the loops out from the video and distributing them standalone. Might want to re-think this article. (For the record I am not a Nokia sympathizer).
The article didn't suggest Nokia broke the EULA, just that it's proven they used a Mac. Technically they could have (and probably did) used FC and not iMovie since the iMovie loops would be available in FC as well.
The EULA basically just says you can't sell the loops, which is pretty obvious. Nothing to see here.