What have you read recently?

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 59
    giaguaragiaguara Posts: 2,724member
    i don't remember.

    but the next one will be a cocoa guide that they don't sell in italy so i'll have to order it from NY ...
  • Reply 22 of 59
    Mary Shelly's Frankenstein

    and

    Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451.



    I re-read these two selected texts once a year. All the other texts that I have read recently are very specific to my architecture thesis that I am working on. I'm guessing that not too many people would be interested in those texts.



    Cheers!
  • Reply 23 of 59
    Louis Calaferte, La Mécanique des Femmes



    sur la sexualité féminine
  • Reply 24 of 59
    xionjaxionja Posts: 504member
    [quote]Originally posted by Matsu:

    <strong>Did ever an author get more milaeage from one novel of questionable importance? "Catcher in the Rye" We still foist this thing on students? Yuck. Matsu pencils a new entry into his to-do list -- write adolescent angst story and market to public schools. Amazing... <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />



    [ 10-27-2002: Message edited by: Matsu ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    ummm, actually, catcher in the rye is a nationally banned book from schools.
  • Reply 25 of 59
    xionjaxionja Posts: 504member
    Yes, the diamond age is pretty good book. Thanks for the input on the essay. Its for a ninth grade english class. Also I wrote it before i bought my printer yesterday, so i was taking my stuff up to my moms computer, and my mom edits a magazine for a living, so she helped me edit it. Handed it in, and I only had two mistakes and other than that, she liked it.(the teacher that is.) Yes, I feel that i did too much sumerizing in it, and it felt silly. The teacher told up that when talking about the book, to talk about in the past tense.Not one of my better essays.



    Next up on my shelves: Any Kurt Vonnegut I can get my hands on, and this one Isabel Allende book, called 'The house of spirits'



    edit=spelling



    [ 10-28-2002: Message edited by: xionja ]</p>
  • Reply 26 of 59
    Calvin and Hobbes-The Days Are Just Packed



    By, Bill Watterson.



    This is the best comic strip in my opinion. I know it isn't really a book, but I enjoy this strip as much as any novel.
  • Reply 27 of 59
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    Ah! Okonkwo! Yams! The man's crop! <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />



    I really like the Yeats poem, The Secong Coming, which is the inspiration for the title of Achebe's book.
  • Reply 27 of 59
    matsumatsu Posts: 6,558member
    [quote]Originally posted by xionja:

    <strong>



    ummm, actually, catcher in the rye is a nationally banned book from schools.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    What? Good God why? It's not been so long since I was out of high-school; we read it. Then again, in Canada, not nearly as much P.C. stupidity penetrates curriculum decisions. Come to think of it, yes, yes it does, though usually it has to do with Canadian content -- paranoid little nationalists that we are. I can only imagine Holden curses a bit too much for PTA tastes, or some idiot school psychologist deemed it harmful to the possibly suicidal, who knows? Does someone say "nigger" ??? Egads!



    So here I find myself defending a book which I don't particularly care for. I'm sure it takes a bit of skill to nail the diction of a slacker teen loser and re-paint a pathetic picture for us, but the question should be, "why bother?" Spoken to a 17 year-old lately? Holden is as annoying as our own modern day teens; coming out of polite 1950's America, that's quite an achievement. ermm... Holden needs to be kicked in the teeth, or maybe he could just jump of a roof 20 pages in and spare us 4-5 hours worth of his plodding whiny bullsiht.



    What a piece of crap. Would I be too optimistic to hope it's been dropped in defence of good taste?



    EDIT: Ooops, it's 17 years old, who'd have thought? The kid sounds considerably less mature.



    [ 10-28-2002: Message edited by: Matsu ]</p>
  • Reply 29 of 59
    timotimo Posts: 353member
    [quote]Originally posted by danielb0101:

    All the other texts that I have read recently are very specific to my architecture thesis that I am working on. I'm guessing that not too many people would be interested in those texts.



    Cheers!<hr></blockquote>



    C'mon, try us. Some of us are refugees from architecture school with our own thesis reading lists.



    I just finished Orwell's Down and Out in Paris and London.
  • Reply 30 of 59
    rooroo Posts: 162member
    [quote]Originally posted by xionja:

    <strong>

    ummm, actually, catcher in the rye is a nationally banned book from schools.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    well, this is partly true. catcher in the rye was one of the top ten "most frequently challenged" books of the 1990s, and was the most frequently banned book from the mid-60s to the mid 70s. however, since each school district gets to choose curriculum, it was never banned nationally. most of the time, the reasons were profanity, sexual content, improper behavior for an adolescent, etc. silly if you ask me.



    ooh, and one more thing, "house of the spirits" is next on my reading list too. errg, when i get free time, that is.



    [ 10-29-2002: Message edited by: roo ]</p>
  • Reply 31 of 59
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    As trite as it is thematically (after the fact, you should note, copycats bring its image down), The Catcher In The Rye is a fantastic book.



    I recently finished Lolita for an English course and it's one of the best books I've ever read. I was amazed at how much I loved it; Nabokov has a wonderful style.



    Also recently:

    One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez

    Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad
  • Reply 32 of 59
    matsumatsu Posts: 6,558member
    "Catcher" fantastic? No.



    Nabakov, a master? Oh yes!



    Lolita, especially, sets up an interesting problem for aesthetics and morality. Wait, that's not really true, a skilled reading reveals no problem at all, rather a masterful manipulation of aesthetic sense. Now you're talking literature my friend.
  • Reply 33 of 59
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    Right, there's really no problem at all. Humbert is a rapist and it's really that simple if you can see through the sophistry.
  • Reply 34 of 59
    matsumatsu Posts: 6,558member
    But it's been a problem for some and that's exactly the point. 'Sin' (if we may apply such an outmoded concept) is tempting, beauty is tempting, why shouldn't sinfully tempting writing be beautiful too? It's a book that calls on you to judge yourself, virtually all the complaints about it come from people who, for whatever reasons, don't get that bit.



    Doesn't help that most people know it by the film...



    [ 10-29-2002: Message edited by: Matsu ]</p>
  • Reply 35 of 59
    kelibkelib Posts: 740member
    Hustler
  • Reply 36 of 59
    Who's Groverat kidding? We all know he's illiterate
  • Reply 37 of 59
    [quote]Originally posted by Dual867:

    <strong>Calvin and Hobbes-The Days Are Just Packed



    By, Bill Watterson.



    This is the best comic strip in my opinion. I know it isn't really a book, but I enjoy this strip as much as any novel.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    agreed!



    sadly i haven't read a book in long time..
  • Reply 38 of 59
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    I think I have most of the C&H collections. There are very few comic strips that are as well done as Calvin & Hobbes.
  • Reply 39 of 59
    [quote]Originally posted by Outsider:

    <strong>



    As expected the writing style is the same as House Atreides/Harkonnen/Corrino series, and once you get over the fact of a Dune series being written by someone other than Frank Herbert (albeit his son) it is pretty good. This is the first of a series, but you will find some things very odd, especially how some of the great families started out. Without giving away any plot I can safely say it is more 'sci-fi' than any Dune novel written so far. You will understand.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    i was quite a bit disapointed in house atreides when i read it. not horrible, mind you, just didn't feel that brian was able to draw me into the story as his father could. not to mention some of the story line got kind of hoaky at times. didn't seem to fit very well, to me at least, with franks work.
  • Reply 40 of 59
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    [quote]Originally posted by running with scissors:

    <strong>



    i was quite a bit disapointed in house atreides when i read it. not horrible, mind you, just didn't feel that brian was able to draw me into the story as his father could. not to mention some of the story line got kind of hoaky at times. didn't seem to fit very well, to me at least, with franks work.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Interesting, what parts did you find hokey? I'm not arguing against but i may agree with you. It has been over a year since I read it. I may have to peruse it. I agree though that Brian is not his father. Frank would immerse you so deeply into the plot that you could not put down the book until you finished it. But Brian does have his way...
Sign In or Register to comment.