Priests face sex abuse lawsuits
Any other organisation would have been raided and shut down by now.
<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/30/1043804453984.html" target="_blank">sex abuse</a>
<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/30/1043804453984.html" target="_blank">sex abuse</a>
Comments
Or something like that.
I care, because you obviously don't, and someone has to
"maintain the rage".
<img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" />
I guess unless they are of age and it's consensual. Then you know ... have fun guys.
This really is an old story in general. But for the record the Church must take responsibility. Or face this even further.
Fellowship
<strong>You condone their behaviour?
I care, because you obviously don't, and someone has to
"maintain the rage".
<img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Yea that's what I said
Go post bad shit about your own contry.
Well done Scott. Go on, push your head in deeper.
Because of people like you, corruption thrives.
He never excused the actions of the church, he even spoke against the priests. He only seems to take umbrage with someone from outside the U.S. pointing out problems in the U.S.
Reading is FUN-damental.
<strong>Looks like we have found ourselves an apologist for the RC church.
Well done Scott. Go on, push your head in deeper.
Because of people like you, corruption thrives.</strong><hr></blockquote>
yea that's what I said
<strong>This is CRAZY!!! I can't believe the crappy lawsuits greedy people will force upon the courts! W00T!!!!
Or something like that.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I hope "WOOT!!!" means something close to "I'm just being sarcastic".
<img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
Unlike stuffing a burger in your face, having someone twice your size, three times your age and a supposed "safe" authority figure turn you out like a prison bitch, that IS a legit, worthwhile thing to pursue legal action over.
It's not as if it's your fault (getting abused).
Lawsuits have their place. No one ever said they didn't and that they were ALL wrong.
<strong>xenu:
He never excused the actions of the church, he even spoke against the priests. He only seems to take umbrage with someone from outside the U.S. pointing out problems in the U.S.
Reading is FUN-damental.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Ignore the good message because you don't like the messenger. Here's a fun idea for an experiment...have the admins change everyone's nickname to Anonymous for a few days and see what kind of conversations develop. No one would know where the messengers come from and thus maybe some of the more ignorant folk here could actually read and evaluate the message without bias.
Signatures would have to be disabled as well as location...I suppose post count too...
[ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: BR ]</p>
<strong>
I hope "WOOT!!!" means something close to "I'm just being sarcastic". </strong><hr></blockquote>
I don't actually know what "W00T" means, but I know I was being sarcastic.
<strong>
I don't actually know what "W00T" means, but I know I was being sarcastic.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Woot is a combination of "woo" and "root." Old first-gen hackers would exclaim "ROOT!" triumphantly when they cracked, well, the root of the server. There was a slashdot article a long time ago about the origins of woot.
sort of like bush pointing out problems in iraq and iran and korea and......
i still don't see where the first post attacked america and americans....but then maybe i don't know the history between scott and xenu.....g
[ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: thegelding ]</p>
<strong>
sort of like bush pointing out problems in iraq and iran and korea and......
i still don't see where the first post attacked america and americans....but then maybe i don't know the history between scott and xenu.....g
[ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: thegelding ]</strong><hr></blockquote>
Let me clearly define the history between scott and xenu. Xenu made a post. Scott looked at Xenu's location tag and noticed that he doesn't live in America. Scott dismisses Xenu's message. It's just that simple. Scott is the prototypical blind pseudo-patriot that is ruining my country.
Anyway you'll end up in the ocean in a few years.
Sorry, I have never been in a flame war. Been meaning to try it.
I LOVE YOU BR AND IT'S NOT THE BOOZE TALKING. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE A RIGHT TO DIE TOO.
[ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: murbot ]</p>
Oh wait. We don't even have enough uniforms to pass around to our soldiers.
Nevermind.
[ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: thegelding ]</p>