Priests face sex abuse lawsuits

xenuxenu
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Any other organisation would have been raided and shut down by now.



<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/30/1043804453984.html"; target="_blank">sex abuse</a>
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 30
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    Why do you care? It's not your country.
  • Reply 2 of 30
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    This is CRAZY!!! I can't believe the crappy lawsuits greedy people will force upon the courts! W00T!!!!



    Or something like that.
  • Reply 3 of 30
    xenuxenu Posts: 204member
    You condone their behaviour?



    I care, because you obviously don't, and someone has to

    "maintain the rage".



    <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" />
  • Reply 4 of 30
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    Um no. A priest BFing someone is not only illegal but causes metal and physical harm.



    I guess unless they are of age and it's consensual. Then you know ... have fun guys.
  • Reply 5 of 30
    fellowshipfellowship Posts: 5,038member
    The members of the church are not above the law and if they are found guilty it is not something that should go without penalty.



    This really is an old story in general. But for the record the Church must take responsibility. Or face this even further.



    Fellowship
  • Reply 6 of 30
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    [quote]Originally posted by xenu:

    <strong>You condone their behaviour?



    I care, because you obviously don't, and someone has to

    "maintain the rage".



    <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Yea that's what I said



    Go post bad shit about your own contry.
  • Reply 7 of 30
    xenuxenu Posts: 204member
    Looks like we have found ourselves an apologist for the RC church.



    Well done Scott. Go on, push your head in deeper.



    Because of people like you, corruption thrives.
  • Reply 8 of 30
    thegeldingthegelding Posts: 3,230member
    since when is priests and raping children about a country?? how was this thread an attack on america??? g
  • Reply 9 of 30
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    xenu:



    He never excused the actions of the church, he even spoke against the priests. He only seems to take umbrage with someone from outside the U.S. pointing out problems in the U.S.



    Reading is FUN-damental.
  • Reply 9 of 30
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    [quote]Originally posted by xenu:

    <strong>Looks like we have found ourselves an apologist for the RC church.



    Well done Scott. Go on, push your head in deeper.



    Because of people like you, corruption thrives.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    yea that's what I said Just make it up and then tell me what I posted so I know.
  • Reply 11 of 30
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    [quote]Originally posted by bunge:

    <strong>This is CRAZY!!! I can't believe the crappy lawsuits greedy people will force upon the courts! W00T!!!!



    Or something like that.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I hope "WOOT!!!" means something close to "I'm just being sarcastic".



    <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />



    Unlike stuffing a burger in your face, having someone twice your size, three times your age and a supposed "safe" authority figure turn you out like a prison bitch, that IS a legit, worthwhile thing to pursue legal action over.



    It's not as if it's your fault (getting abused).



    Lawsuits have their place. No one ever said they didn't and that they were ALL wrong.
  • Reply 12 of 30
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    [quote]Originally posted by groverat:

    <strong>xenu:



    He never excused the actions of the church, he even spoke against the priests. He only seems to take umbrage with someone from outside the U.S. pointing out problems in the U.S.



    Reading is FUN-damental.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Ignore the good message because you don't like the messenger. Here's a fun idea for an experiment...have the admins change everyone's nickname to Anonymous for a few days and see what kind of conversations develop. No one would know where the messengers come from and thus maybe some of the more ignorant folk here could actually read and evaluate the message without bias.



    Signatures would have to be disabled as well as location...I suppose post count too...



    [ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: BR ]</p>
  • Reply 13 of 30
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    [quote]Originally posted by pscates:

    <strong>



    I hope "WOOT!!!" means something close to "I'm just being sarcastic". </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I don't actually know what "W00T" means, but I know I was being sarcastic.
  • Reply 14 of 30
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    [quote]Originally posted by bunge:

    <strong>



    I don't actually know what "W00T" means, but I know I was being sarcastic.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Woot is a combination of "woo" and "root." Old first-gen hackers would exclaim "ROOT!" triumphantly when they cracked, well, the root of the server. There was a slashdot article a long time ago about the origins of woot.
  • Reply 15 of 30
    thegeldingthegelding Posts: 3,230member
    [quote] He only seems to take umbrage with someone from outside the U.S. pointing out problems in the U.S. <hr></blockquote>



    sort of like bush pointing out problems in iraq and iran and korea and......



    i still don't see where the first post attacked america and americans....but then maybe i don't know the history between scott and xenu.....g



    [ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: thegelding ]</p>
  • Reply 16 of 30
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    [quote]Originally posted by thegelding:

    <strong>



    sort of like bush pointing out problems in iraq and iran and korea and......



    i still don't see where the first post attacked america and americans....but then maybe i don't know the history between scott and xenu.....g



    [ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: thegelding ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Let me clearly define the history between scott and xenu. Xenu made a post. Scott looked at Xenu's location tag and noticed that he doesn't live in America. Scott dismisses Xenu's message. It's just that simple. Scott is the prototypical blind pseudo-patriot that is ruining my country.
  • Reply 17 of 30
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    Oh yeah? You can't even grow enough water there dude, you need to suck ours down!!!1



    Anyway you'll end up in the ocean in a few years.



    Sorry, I have never been in a flame war. Been meaning to try it.







    I LOVE YOU BR AND IT'S NOT THE BOOZE TALKING. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE A RIGHT TO DIE TOO.



    [ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: murbot ]</p>
  • Reply 18 of 30
    thegeldingthegelding Posts: 3,230member
    hell yeah, i expect the us to take over canada anyday now....hell, what would it take...the country has what??? if you exclude toronto you probably have 14 people with a college degree...raise the US border about 85 miles north and then nuke everything north of that...wait about 10000 years and then take all the water you can....g
  • Reply 19 of 30
    murbotmurbot Posts: 5,262member
    We'll kick your ass again. White House? Yeah, we burned that. We also kicked your sorry asses back down south when you tried taking half of Canada.



    Oh wait. We don't even have enough uniforms to pass around to our soldiers.



    Nevermind.
  • Reply 20 of 30
    thegeldingthegelding Posts: 3,230member
    we will pass out free labatts and hockey sticks and canada will roll as fast as a woman off the wet spot....g



    [ 01-30-2003: Message edited by: thegelding ]</p>
Sign In or Register to comment.